| Literature DB >> 31783517 |
Benito Gómez-Silva1, Claudia Vilo-Muñoz1, Alexandra Galetović1, Qunfeng Dong2, Hugo G Castelán-Sánchez3, Yordanis Pérez-Llano3,4, María Del Rayo Sánchez-Carbente4, Sonia Dávila-Ramos3, Nohemí Gabriela Cortés-López5, Liliana Martínez-Ávila3, Alan D W Dobson6,7, Ramón Alberto Batista-García3.
Abstract
Halites, which are typically found in various Atacama locations, are evaporitic rocks that are considered as micro-scaled salterns. Both structural and functional metagenomic analyses of halite nodules were performed. Structural analyses indicated that the halite microbiota is mainly composed of NaCl-adapted microorganisms. In addition, halites appear to harbor a limited diversity of fungal families together with a biodiverse collection of protozoa. Functional analysis indicated that the halite microbiome possesses the capacity to make an extensive contribution to carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycles, but possess a limited capacity to fix nitrogen. The halite metagenome also contains a vast repertory of carbohydrate active enzymes (CAZY) with glycosyl transferases being the most abundant class present, followed by glycosyl hydrolases (GH). Amylases were also present in high abundance, with GH also being identified. Thus, the halite microbiota is a potential useful source of novel enzymes that could have biotechnological applicability. This is the first metagenomic report of fungi and protozoa as endolithobionts of halite nodules, as well as the first attempt to describe the repertoire of CAZY in this community. In addition, we present a comprehensive functional metagenomic analysis of the metabolic capacities of the halite microbiota, providing evidence for the first time on the sulfur cycle in Atacama halites.Entities:
Keywords: Atacama Desert; CAZyme; endolithic fungi; functional metagenomics; halite
Year: 2019 PMID: 31783517 PMCID: PMC6956184 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7120619
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Figure 1Presence of fungi in Atacama halite metagenome: (A) relative abundance of fungal family in the halite metagenome; and (B) fungal species annotated as endolithobionts in the halite metagenome.
Figure 2Relative abundance (%) at genus level of fungal communities in both halite crusts and nodules. Crusts 1–3 represent the metagenomes analyzed by Finstad et al [9], while Endolithic 1 corresponds to metagenome analyzed by Crits-Christoph et al [8]. Endolithic 2 represents the halite metagenome analyzed in this work.
Figure 3Taxonomic assignment of protozoan in the halite metagenome.
Figure 4(A) Multidimensional scaling analysis based on taxonomic domains. Comparison of our results with previous published metagenome analysis from Atacama´s desert halite rock samples [8,9]. (B) Bacteria and Archaea, and (C) Viruses. Crusts 1–3 represent the metagenomes analyzed by the authors of [9], while Endolithic 1 corresponds to metagenome analyzed by the authors of [8]. Endolithic 2 represents the halite metagenome analyzed in this work. Metagenome identifies as Hypolithic corresponds with the data obtained by the authors of [22]. Table S1 summarizes the characteristic of metagenomic data identified as Hypersaline 1–5 and Desert soil 1–4.
Figure 5Biophysical properties of the predicted intracellular proteome and predicted secretome (by SignalP v4.0) in the metagenomic sequences from Atacama Desert halites. (A) Charge; (B) pI; and (C) Kyte-Doolittle Hydrophobicity (H_KD) index are represented for Archaea and Bacteria (left) and Fungi (right).
Figure 6Functional description of the endolithic community in halites: (A) open reading frames predicted in different phyla; (B) main functional processes enriched in the halite metagenome; and (C) the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes functional annotation.
Figure 7Clustering hierarchical of pathways of the biogeochemical cycles in halites. Hierarchical heat map is shown where the most pathways in biogeochemical cycles are marked in red colors. Crusts 1–3 represent the metagenomes analyzed by the authors of [9], while Endolithic 1 corresponds to metagenome analyzed by the authors of [8]. Endolithic 2 represents the halite metagenome analyzed in this work.
Figure 8Prediction of CAZymes in the halite metagenome: (A) CAZyme composition using three different algorithms; (B) CAZyme annotated as Glycosyl Transferases (GT), Glycosyl Hydrolases (GH), Carbohydrate Esterases (CE), Auxiliary Activities (AA), and Polysaccharide Lyases (PL); and (C,D) family distributions of GT and GH, respectively.
Figure 9Phylogenetic tree of the family GH13 α-amylases. The phylogeny was prepared based on the alignments of seven conserved sequence regions. Sequences from different GH13 subfamilies were considered in the analysis and are identified by their UnitProt Accession Numbers and source names.
Statistics of the 3D modeling of glycoside hydrolases identified in halite metagenome.
| Sequence | iTASSER ID | C-Score | TM-Score | RMSD (Å) | GH Family/Activity Associated | Templates | Structural Analogs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| k141_2995_1_516_- | S461623 | 0.39 | 0.77 ± 0.10 | 4.2 ± 2.8 | GH10/ | 1vbr, 6fhe, 5ofj, 3emq, 2q8x, 2uwf, 3u7b | 5ofj, 3ms8, 2uwf, 3emc, 1r85, 2f8q, 1clx, 4w8l, 2cnc, 2dpe |
| k141_6861_1_322_+ | S461626 | 0.24 | 0.75 ± 0.11 | 3.6 ± 2.5 | GH43/ | 4qqs, 3kst, 1yrz, 4kca, 4kc7, 5ho0 | 4qqs, 3kst, 5z5d, 1yi7, 5jow, 1yrz, 3qz4, 1yif |
| k141_9036_1_604_- | S461628 | 0.99 | 0.85 ± 0.08 | 3.4 ± 2.4 | GH3/ | 5vqd, 5vqe, 3cqm, 1tr9, 3bmx, 5bu9, | 3nvd, 5qve, 3sqm, 5jp0, 4zm6, 5yot, 5m6g, 3f93, 1iew, 5bu9 |
| k141_10879_1_560_- | S461631 | 0.12 | 0.73 ± 0.11 | 4.9 ± 3.2 | GH5/ | 1rh9, 4lpy | 1rh9, 3pzm, 4l3m, 1uuq, 4lpy, 3wh9, 1pnp, 3ziz, 4awe, 2xg9 |
| k141_9497_1_728_+ | S461630 | 0.22 | 0.74 ± 0.11 | 5.3 ± 3.4 | GH30/ | 3clw, 2v3e, 5ngk, 2wnw | 3clw, 2f61, 2wnw, 5ngk, 6iuj, 4b3k, 3kl3, 5ndx, 5bx9, 5ta0 |
| k141_15375_1_491_- | S461835 | 0.62 | 0.80 ± 0.09 | 3.7 ± 2.5 | GH5/ | 3pz9, 4l3m, 3wfl, 1rh9, 4lyp | 3pzm, 4l3m, 1rh9, 3wh9, 3wfl, 1qno, 3ziz, 4awe, 1uz4, 4lyp |
| k141_14357_218_1033_- | S461832 | 0.22 | 0.74 ± 0.11 | 5.5 ± 3.5 | GH15/ | 5gzh, 5z06, 4gl3 | 5gzh, 5z06, 4gl3, 3eu8, 6imu, 6fhw, 2vn4, 1gly, 1dl2 |
| k141_11065_1_594_- | S461829 | 1.30 | 0.89 ± 0.07 | 2.8 ± 2.0 | GH3/ | 5yot, 5z9s, 5jp0, 5z87 | 5z87, 5yot, 5jp0, 5z9s, 5a7m, 4zo6, 1ex1, 3u48, 5m6g, 3ut0 |
| k141_3756_1_1250_- | S461624 | 0.92 | 0.60 ± 0.14 | 9.0 ± 4.6 | GH10/ | 1isy, 2cnc, 4l4o, lisv, 4k68, 2q8x, 1vbr | 1isy, 4w8l, 1us2, 2cnc, 5ofj, 3ms8, 3emz, 4l4o, 4k68 |
| k141_827_1470_3344_- | S461622 | 0.03 | 0.71 ± 0.12 | 7.9 ± 4.4 | GH55/ | 5m5z, 3eqn | 3eqn, 5m5z, 4pew, 5gkd, 5ggc, 1ofl, 1rmg, 5z9t, 4oj5, 3zzp |
| k141_13601_1_1245_- | S461831 | 0.81 | 0.61 ± 0.14 | 8.7 ± 6.4 | G51/ | 6d25, 2vrq | 6d25, 2vrq, 2c8n, 2y2w, 1pz3, 3ug4, 3vny, 5bwi, 3ii1, 2j25 |
| k141_19777_314_775_- | S462092 | 0.44 | 0.77 ± 0.10 | 3.9 ± 2.7 | GH5/ | 4l3m, 1rh9, 3wh9 | 4l3m, 3pzm, 1rh9, 4awe, 3wh9, 3wfl, 3ziz, 1qnp, 1uuq, 4lyp |
| k141_35613_1609_2534_- | S466607 | 0.63 | 0.80 ± 0.09 | 4.9 ± 3.2 | GH30/ | 3clw, 6iuj, 2v3e, | 3clw, 6iuj, 2c8n, 1pz3, 2f61, 3kl0, 4qaw, 5cxp, 6d25, 4fmv |
| k141_39467_1_958_- | S466608 | 0.18 | 0.74 ± 0.11 | 5.9 ± 3.7 | GH10/ | 1xyz, 5ofj, 3wub, 4k68, 2q8x, 2uwf | 1hiz, 6fhf, 2fgl, 2uwf, 5ofj, 3msd, 3emc, 4l4o, 1us3, 4w81 |
| k141_40844_1_1278_+ | S466609 | 0.83 | 0.83 ± 0.08 | 5.2 ± 3.3 | GH51/ | 6d25, 2vrq | 6d25, 2vrq, 1p23, 2c8n, 2y2w, 3s2c, 3vo0, 3ik2, 2yjg, 3fw6 |
| k141_42666_1_1020_- | S466610 | 1.27 | 0.89 ± 0.07 | 3.9 ± 2.6 | GH3/ | 3sq1, 3cqm, 4zm6, 5vqd | 3sql, 3sqm, 3nvd, 5vqd, 4zm6, 5jp0, 5m6g, 1iew, 5yot, 5bu9 |
| k141_46724_1_745_+ | S466611 | 0.37 | 0.76 ± 0.10 | 5.0 ± 3.2 | GH5/ | 1rh9, 1uuq, 4lpy, 4l3m | 1rh9, 4l3m, 3pzg, 1uz4, 3wh9, 4awe, 3wfl, 1qno, 3ziz, 4lyp |