| Literature DB >> 24860557 |
Ana Plemenitaš1, Metka Lenassi1, Tilen Konte1, Anja Kejžar1, Janja Zajc2, Cene Gostinčar3, Nina Gunde-Cimerman4.
Abstract
Molecular studies of salt tolerance of eukaryotic microorganisms have until recently been limited to the baker's yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and a few other moderately halotolerant yeast. Discovery of the extremely halotolerant and adaptable fungus Hortaea werneckii and the obligate halophile Wallemia ichthyophaga introduced two new model organisms into studies on the mechanisms of salt tolerance in eukaryotes. H. werneckii is unique in its adaptability to fluctuations in salt concentrations, as it can grow without NaCl as well as in the presence of up to 5 M NaCl. On the other hand, W. ichthyophaga requires at least 1.5 M NaCl for growth, but also grows in up to 5 M NaCl. Our studies have revealed the novel and intricate molecular mechanisms used by these fungi to combat high salt concentrations, which differ in many aspects between the extremely halotolerant H. werneckii and the halophilic W. ichthyophaga. Specifically, the high osmolarity glycerol signaling pathway that is important for sensing and responding to increased salt concentrations is here compared between H. werneckii and W. ichthyophaga. In both of these fungi, the key signaling components are conserved, but there are structural and regulation differences between these pathways in H. werneckii and W. ichthyophaga. We also address differences that have been revealed from analysis of their newly sequenced genomes. The most striking characteristics associated with H. werneckii are the large genetic redundancy, the expansion of genes encoding metal cation transporters, and a relatively recent whole genome duplication. In contrast, the genome of W. ichthyophaga is very compact, as only 4884 protein-coding genes are predicted, which cover almost three quarters of the sequence. Importantly, there has been a significant increase in their hydrophobins, cell-wall proteins that have multiple cellular functions.Entities:
Keywords: HOG signaling pathway; Hortaea werneckii genome; Wallemia ichthyophaga genome; halophilic/halotolerant fungi; ion homeostasis
Year: 2014 PMID: 24860557 PMCID: PMC4017127 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00199
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Model of the key adaptations in .
Major proteins, identified in .
| transmembrane osmosensor | Sho1 | HwSho1A/B | |
| MAP kinase kinase | Pbs2 | HwPbs2A/B | WiPbs2 |
| MAP kinase | Hog1 (ScHog1) | HwHog1A/B | WiHog1A/B |
| MAP kinase kinase kinase | Ste11 | HwSte11A/B | WiSte11 |
| phosphorelay response regulator | Ssk1 | HwSsk1A/B | WiSsk1 |
| MAP kinase kinase kinase | Ssk2 | HwSsk2A/B | WiSsk2 |
| hybrid hystidine kinase | HwHhk7A/B | ||
| tyrosine (Y) phosphatase dependent | Ypd1 | HwYpd1A/B | WiYpd1 |
| mating-type protein | Mat1-1-1 or Mat1-2-1 | HwMat1-1-1A/B | none |
| glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase | Gpd1, Gpd2 | HwGpd1A/B, HwGpd2A/B | WiGpd1, WiGpd2 |
| glycerol-3-phosphatase | Gpp1, Gpp2 | WiGpp1 | |
| glycerol proton symporter, plasma membrane | Stl1 | 4 | |
| aquaglyceroporin | Fps1 | 3 | |
| D-arabinitol-2-dehydrogenase | 2 | ||
| K+ efflux antiporter, plasma membrane | Nha1 | 8 | 2 |
| K+ efflux channel, plasma membrane | Tok1 | 4 | none |
| K+ uptake uniporter, plasma membrane | Trk1,2 | 8 | 1 |
| Na+ (and Li+) efflux P-type ATPase, plasma membrane | Ena1-5 | 4 | 2 |
| Na+/P | Pho89 | 6 | 1 |
| H+ exporter P-type ATPase, plasma membrane | Pma1 | 4 | 3 |
| K+/H+ antiporter, Golgi apparatus | Kha1 | 2 | 2 |
| Na+/H+ antiporter, late endosomes | Nhx1 | 2 | 1 |
| Na+, K+/H+ antiporter, vacuole | Vnx1 | 8 | 1 |
| H+ V-type ATPase, subunit A | Vma1 | 2 | 1 |
| K+/H+ antiporter, mitochondria | Mrs7/Mdm38 | 2 | 1 |
The columns contain protein names or number of homologs of each protein.
Genome statistics for .
| Coverage | >270× | ~70× |
| Genome assembly size (Mbp) | 9.63 | 51.6 |
| Number of contigs | 101 | ~20,000 |
| Number of scaffolds | 82 | / |
| Gene models (n) | 4884 | 23333 |
| GC content (%) | 45% | 54% |
| GC content of exons (%) | 48% | 56% |
| Repeat content (%) | 1.67% | 1.02% |