Literature DB >> 3178206

Effects of an abrupt diet change from hay to concentrate on microbial numbers and physical environment in the cecum of the pony.

J Goodson1, W J Tyznik, J H Cline, B A Dehority.   

Abstract

Microbial numbers, pH, fluid volume, and turnover rate in the pony cecum were measured during an abrupt change from an all-forage to an all-concentrate diet, both fed at maintenance energy levels. Concentrate feeding resulted in increased (P less than 0.01) numbers of total viable anaerobic bacteria. The numbers of organisms growing on selective starch medium increased (P less than 0.01) when concentrate was fed, while numbers on xylan and pectin media decreased (P less than 0.025). Seven days after the diet change to concentrate, the number of bacteria growing on lactate medium increased (P less than 0.01), followed by a gradual decline. Cellulolytic bacteria occurred in low numbers, ranging from 1.1 x 10(4) to 4.4 x 10(4) per g of cecal contents. Feeding all concentrate decreased both the number of genera (P less than 0.01) and total protozoan numbers (P less than 0.01) in the cecum. Minimum cecal pH values of 6.4 and 5.8 were obtained when forage and concentrate, respectively, were fed, with the minimum pH occurring 6 h postfeeding. Dry-matter percentage of cecal contents followed a diurnal pattern which was the inverse of the pH curve. During forage feeding, the cecum contained an average of 2.2 liters (1.6 to 3.4 liters), which turned over 3.9 times per day. When concentrate was fed, cecal volume averaged 3.9 liters (0.6 to 8.6 liters), with a mean liquid turnover of 4.2 times per day. Microbial numbers and pH changes in the pony cecum associated with an abrupt change in diet from hay to concentrate resembled those which occur in the rumen under similar feeding conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3178206      PMCID: PMC202784          DOI: 10.1128/aem.54.8.1946-1950.1988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  10 in total

1.  Effect of diet on cecal pH and feeding behavior of horses.

Authors:  J G Willard; J C Willard; S A Wolfram; J P Baker
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  The quantity and distribution of the ciliate protozoa in the large intestine of the horse.

Authors:  K M G ADAM
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  1951-12       Impact factor: 3.234

3.  Basal medium for the selective enumeration of rumen bacteria utilizing specific energy sources.

Authors:  B A Dehority; J A Grubb
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Ponies vs. steers: microbial and chemical characteristics of intestinal ingesta.

Authors:  D L Kern; L L Slyter; E C Leffel; J M Weaver; R R Oltjen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Pectin-fermenting bacteria isolated from the bovine rumen.

Authors:  B A Dehority
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 6.  Influence of acidosis on rumen function.

Authors:  L L Slyter
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Pony cecum vs. steer rumen: the effect of oats and hay on the microbial ecosystem.

Authors:  D L Kern; L L Slyter; J M Weaver; E C Leffel; G Samuelson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1973-08       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Digesta passage and water exchange in the equine large intestine.

Authors:  R A Argenzio; J E Lowe; D W Pickard; C E Stevens
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1974-05

9.  Lactic acidosis: a factor associated with equine laminitis.

Authors:  H E Garner; D P Hutcheson; J R Coffman; A W Hahn; C Salem
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 3.159

10.  Cellulolytic and non-cellulolytic bacteria in rat gastrointestinal tracts.

Authors:  J M Macy; J R Farrand; L Montgomery
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 4.792

  10 in total
  13 in total

1.  Evaluation of equine rectal inoculum as representative of the microbial activities within the horse hindgut using a fully automated in vitro gas production technique system.

Authors:  Theresa J Kujawa; David A van Doorn; Wendy A Wambacq; Myriam Hesta; Wilbert F Pellikaan
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Identification of Ruminococcus flavefaciens as the predominant cellulolytic bacterial species of the equine cecum.

Authors:  V Julliand; A de Vaux; L Millet; G Fonty
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Effects of grazing system, season, and forage carbohydrates on glucose and insulin dynamics of the grazing horse.

Authors:  Carey A Williams; Laura B Kenny; Amy O Burk
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Biomarkers for monitoring the equine large intestinal inflammatory response to stress-induced dysbiosis and probiotic supplementation.

Authors:  Axelle Collinet; Pauline Grimm; Emmanuel Jacotot; Véronique Julliand
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-10-01       Impact factor: 3.338

5.  Adaptive response of equine intestinal Na+/glucose co-transporter (SGLT1) to an increase in dietary soluble carbohydrate.

Authors:  Jane Dyer; Miran Al-Rammahi; Louise Waterfall; Kieron S H Salmon; Ray J Geor; Ludovic Bouré; G Barrie Edwards; Christopher J Proudman; Soraya P Shirazi-Beechey
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2008-12-02       Impact factor: 3.657

6.  Sequential Modulation of the Equine Fecal Microbiota and Fibrolytic Capacity Following Two Consecutive Abrupt Dietary Changes and Bacterial Supplementation.

Authors:  Axelle Collinet; Pauline Grimm; Samy Julliand; Véronique Julliand
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Characterisation of the faecal bacterial community in adult and elderly horses fed a high fibre, high oil or high starch diet using 454 pyrosequencing.

Authors:  Kirsty Dougal; Gabriel de la Fuente; Patricia A Harris; Susan E Girdwood; Eric Pinloche; Raymond J Geor; Brian D Nielsen; Harold C Schott; Sarah Elzinga; C Jamie Newbold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Gut microbiota resilience in horse athletes following holidays out to pasture.

Authors:  Núria Mach; Léa Lansade; David Bars-Cortina; Sophie Dhorne-Pollet; Aline Foury; Marie-Pierre Moisan; Alice Ruet
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA genes in fecal samples reveals high diversity of hindgut microflora in horses and potential links to chronic laminitis.

Authors:  Samantha M Steelman; Bhanu P Chowdhary; Scot Dowd; Jan Suchodolski; Jan E Janečka
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 2.741

10.  Effect of Dietary Starch Source and Concentration on Equine Fecal Microbiota.

Authors:  Brittany E Harlow; Laurie M Lawrence; Susan H Hayes; Andrea Crum; Michael D Flythe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.