| Literature DB >> 23186268 |
Samantha M Steelman1, Bhanu P Chowdhary, Scot Dowd, Jan Suchodolski, Jan E Janečka.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The nutrition and health of horses is closely tied to their gastrointestinal microflora. Gut bacteria break down plant structural carbohydrates and produce volatile fatty acids, which are a major source of energy for horses. Bacterial communities are also essential for maintaining gut homeostasis and have been hypothesized to contribute to various diseases including laminitis. We performed pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA bacterial genes isolated from fecal material to characterize hindgut bacterial communities in healthy horses and those with chronic laminitis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 23186268 PMCID: PMC3538718 DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-231
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Diversity indices of the gastrointestinal microflora in horses
| 97% Similarity OTUs | |||
| OTUs per animal | 381.7 (SE = 26.6) | 355.2 (SE = 26.3) | 419.6 (SE = 49.3) |
| OTUs (rfd)* | 338.8.0 (SE = 52.3) | 330.4 (SE = 57.5) | 369.5 (SE = 51.8) |
| Chao1 | 795.7 (SE = 51.7) | 741.9 (SE = 66.2) | 872.6 (SE = 77.4) |
| Chao1 (rfd)* | 761.3 (SE = 82.2) | 735.7 (SE = 123.4) | 816.4 (SE = 65.5) |
| Phylogenetic Distance | 16.15 (SE = 0.82) | 15.37 (SE = 0.85) | 17.26 (SE = 1.50) |
| Phylogenetic Distance (rfd) | 14.85 (SE = 1.50) | 14.43 (SE = 1.05) | 16.00 (SE = 2.00) |
| Shannon | 5.07 (SE = 0.59) | 5.01 (SE = 0.71) | 5.16 (SE = 1.06) |
| Simpson | 0.74 (SE = 0.08) | 0.75 (SE = 0.09) | 0.72 (SE = 0.14) |
| Genera | |||
| Total | 108 | 101 | 89 |
| Mean per animal | 53.4 (SE ± 1.60) | 52.3 (SE ± 1.60) | 55.0 (SE ± 1.65) |
The OTUs (97% similarity), Chao1, Phylogenetic Distance, Shannon, and Simpson diversity indices were estimated in QIIME. Rarified OTU, Chao1, and Phylogenetic Distance estimates were rarefied (rfd) to a depth of 1,100 reads to reduce sampling heterogeneity. * Significant difference, (OTUs, P = 0.019; Chao1, P = 0.020).
Figure 1Observed bacterial OTUs and Chao1 index plots. Plots were made using data rarefied to a depth of 1,200 reads per sample in QIIME. (A) Mean OTUs, (B) Chao1 index.
Figure 2The abundance of bacterial taxonomic groups in horses. The mean percentage of reads assigned to the respective taxonomic group for control and laminitis groups. Taxonomic assignments were based on 16S rRNA sequences using the Ribosomal Database Project classifier in QIIME. (A) Phylum, (B) Class, (C) Order, (D) Family, (E) Genus. *Significant difference between groups (P = 0.03 and 0.01, respectively).
The percentage of OTUs that were assigned to the 20 most abundant microbial genera
| 100% | 21.00% | 24.10% | 9.03% | 16.03% | 8.71% | |
| RFP12 (O) | 100% | 19.96% | 16.79% | 5.32% | 25.02% | 4.01% |
| Ruminococcaceae (F) | 100% | 8.95% | 8.30% | 1.92% | 9.99% | 1.54% |
| Clostridiaceae (F) | 100% | 6.20% | 10.03%* | 0.50% | 0.07% | 1.29% |
| Bacteroidales (O) | 100% | 5.41% | 3.96% | 0.64% | 7.73% | 0.67% |
| 100% | 4.75% | 5.30% | 2.87% | 3.88% | 0.80% | |
| Clostridiales (O)* | 100% | 4.58% | 3.80% | 1.03% | 5.82% | 0.92% |
| Lachnospiraceae (F) | 100% | 4.14% | 4.07% | 1.53% | 4.25% | 0.90% |
| 100% | 2.58% | 2.87% | 0.34% | 2.10% | 0.34% | |
| Clostridiales (O)* | 100% | 2.27% | 1.63% | 0.34% | 3.29% | 0.39% |
| Ruminococcaceae (F) | 100% | 1.81% | 1.66% | 0.60% | 2.04% | 0.26% |
| 94% | 1.80% | 1.30% | 0.32% | 2.61% | 0.56% | |
| 100% | 1.44% | 1.51% | 0.48% | 1.34% | 0.13% | |
| 88%% | 1.30% | 1.53% | 0.49% | 0.95% | 0.22% | |
| Lachnospiraceae (F) | 100% | 1.16% | 1.02% | 0.27% | 1.39% | 0.15% |
| Clostridiales XIII I. sedis (F) | 100% | 0.99% | 0.50% | 0.17% | 1.78% | 0.13% |
| Firmicutes (P) | 94% | 0.93% | 0.81% | 0.71% | 1.12% | 0.30% |
| 88% | 0.82% | 0.88% | 0.05% | 0.72% | 0.18% | |
| 67% | 0.78% | 1.27% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |
| 88% | 0.65% | 0.60% | 0.27% | 0.73% | 0.21% | |
The OTU assignments were made using the Ribosomal Database Project classifier in QIIME. The mean and standard error (S.E.) of the percentage of reads that map to the respective genus is provided. If the OTU was not assigned to a known genus its nearest available taxonomic rank is provided. F = Family, O = Order, P = Phylum. *Significant differences between groups (P = 0.03 and 0.01, respectively).
Figure 3Principal coordinate analysis of unweighted UniFrac distances. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plots were made using jackknifed UniFrac distances in QIIME. Red data points represent control horses and the blue horses with chronic laminitis. (A) PC1 versus PC2, (B) PC1 versus PC3, (C) PC2 versus PC3.