Literature DB >> 31777925

High-resolution EPR distance measurements on RNA and DNA with the non-covalent Ǵ spin label.

Marcel Heinz1, Nicole Erlenbach2, Lukas S Stelzl1, Grace Thierolf2, Nilesh R Kamble3, Snorri Th Sigurdsson3, Thomas F Prisner2, Gerhard Hummer1,4.   

Abstract

Pulsed electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) experiments, among them most prominently pulsed electron-electron double resonance experiments (PELDOR/DEER), resolve the conformational dynamics of nucleic acids with high resolution. The wide application of these powerful experiments is limited by the synthetic complexity of some of the best-performing spin labels. The recently developed $\bf\acute{G}$ (G-spin) label, an isoindoline-nitroxide derivative of guanine, can be incorporated non-covalently into DNA and RNA duplexes via Watson-Crick base pairing in an abasic site. We used PELDOR and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to characterize $\bf\acute{G}$, obtaining excellent agreement between experiments and time traces calculated from MD simulations of RNA and DNA double helices with explicitly modeled $\bf\acute{G}$ bound in two abasic sites. The MD simulations reveal stable hydrogen bonds between the spin labels and the paired cytosines. The abasic sites do not significantly perturb the helical structure. $\bf\acute{G}$ remains rigidly bound to helical RNA and DNA. The distance distributions between the two bound $\bf\acute{G}$ labels are not substantially broadened by spin-label motions in the abasic site and agree well between experiment and MD. $\bf\acute{G}$ and similar non-covalently attached spin labels promise high-quality distance and orientation information, also of complexes of nucleic acids and proteins.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31777925      PMCID: PMC6954412          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkz1096

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  49 in total

1.  Validation of the B3LYP/N07D and PBE0/N07D Computational Models for the Calculation of Electronic g-Tensors.

Authors:  Vincenzo Barone; Paola Cimino
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 6.006

2.  Precision DEER Distances from Spin-Label Ensemble Refinement.

Authors:  Katrin Reichel; Lukas S Stelzl; Jürgen Köfinger; Gerhard Hummer
Journal:  J Phys Chem Lett       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 6.475

3.  do_x3dna: a tool to analyze structural fluctuations of dsDNA or dsRNA from molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Rajendra Kumar; Helmut Grubmüller
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Optimal Destabilization of DNA Double Strands by Single-Nucleobase Caging.

Authors:  Patrick Seyfried; Marcel Heinz; György Pintér; Dean-Paulos Klötzner; Yvonne Becker; Michael Bolte; Hendrik R A Jonker; Lukas S Stelzl; Gerhard Hummer; Harald Schwalbe; Alexander Heckel
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 5.236

Review 5.  The dynamic duo: combining NMR and small angle scattering in structural biology.

Authors:  Janosch Hennig; Michael Sattler
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Explaining the striking difference in twist-stretch coupling between DNA and RNA: A comparative molecular dynamics analysis.

Authors:  Korbinian Liebl; Tomas Drsata; Filip Lankas; Jan Lipfert; Martin Zacharias
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Reference simulations of noncanonical nucleic acids with different χ variants of the AMBER force field: quadruplex DNA, quadruplex RNA and Z-DNA.

Authors:  Miroslav Krepl; Marie Zgarbová; Petr Stadlbauer; Michal Otyepka; Pavel Banáš; Jaroslav Koča; Thomas E Cheatham; Petr Jurečka; Jiří Sponer
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 6.006

8.  How accurate are accurate force-fields for B-DNA?

Authors:  Pablo D Dans; Ivan Ivani; Adam Hospital; Guillem Portella; Carlos González; Modesto Orozco
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  High-resolution NMR structure of an RNA model system: the 14-mer cUUCGg tetraloop hairpin RNA.

Authors:  Senada Nozinovic; Boris Fürtig; Hendrik R A Jonker; Christian Richter; Harald Schwalbe
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  High-resolution measurement of long-range distances in RNA: pulse EPR spectroscopy with TEMPO-labeled nucleotides.

Authors:  Karin Halbmair; Jan Seikowski; Igor Tkach; Claudia Höbartner; Deniz Sezer; Marina Bennati
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 9.825

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Paramagnetic Chemical Probes for Studying Biological Macromolecules.

Authors:  Qing Miao; Christoph Nitsche; Henry Orton; Mark Overhand; Gottfried Otting; Marcellus Ubbink
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 72.087

Review 2.  EPR Spectroscopy Provides New Insights into Complex Biological Reaction Mechanisms.

Authors:  Lukas Hofmann; Sharon Ruthstein
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 3.466

3.  Cu2+-based distance measurements by pulsed EPR provide distance constraints for DNA backbone conformations in solution.

Authors:  Shreya Ghosh; Matthew J Lawless; Hanna J Brubaker; Kevin Singewald; Michael R Kurpiewski; Linda Jen-Jacobson; Sunil Saxena
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 16.971

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.