Literature DB >> 31772966

Improving Head and Neck Cancer Treatments Using Dynamic Collimation in Spot Scanning Proton Therapy.

Alexandra Moignier1, Edgar Gelover1, Dongxu Wang1, Blake Smith1, Ryan Flynn1, Maura Kirk2, Liyong Lin2, Timothy Solberg2, Alexander Lin2, Daniel Hyer1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Interest in using collimation for spot scanning proton therapy has recently increased in an attempt to improve the lateral penumbra. To investigate the advantages of such an approach for complex targets, a plan comparison between uncollimated and collimated beam spots was performed for patients with head and neck cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For 10 patients with head and neck cancer, previously treated with spot scanning proton therapy, uncollimated and collimated treatment plans were created using an in-house treatment-planning system capable of modeling asymmetric-beamlet dose distributions resulting from the use of a dynamic collimation system. Both uncollimated and collimated plans reproduced clinically delivered plans in terms of target coverage. A relative plan comparison was performed using both physical and radiobiological metrics on the organs at risk.
RESULTS: The dynamic collimation system improved dose-distribution conformity while preserving target coverage. The median reduction of the mean dose to the esophagus, uninvolved larynx, and uninvolved parotids were -11.9% (minimum to maximum, -6.4% to -24.1%), -7.2% (-0.8% to -60.1%), and -5.2% (-0.2% to -21.5%), respectively, and depended on the organ location relative to the target and radiation beam angle. The collimation did not improve dose to some organs at risk surrounded by the target or located upstream of Bragg peaks because of the priority on the target coverage.
CONCLUSION: In spot scanning proton therapy, the dynamic collimation system generally affords better target conformity, which results in improvement in organ-at-risk sparing in the head and neck region while preserving target coverage. However, the benefits of collimation and the increased complexity should be considered for each patient. Patients with large bilateral targets or organs at risk surrounded by the target showed the least benefit. © Copyright 2016 International Journal of Particle Therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  collimation; head and neck; spot scanning proton therapy

Year:  2016        PMID: 31772966      PMCID: PMC6871640          DOI: 10.14338/IJPT-15-00026.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Part Ther        ISSN: 2331-5180


  22 in total

1.  A new formula for normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) as a function of equivalent uniform dose (EUD).

Authors:  Gary Luxton; Paul J Keall; Christopher R King
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Comparison of intensity modulated x-ray therapy and intensity modulated proton therapy for selective subvolume boosting: a phantom study.

Authors:  R T Flynn; D L Barbee; T R Mackie; R Jeraj
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Experimentally validated pencil beam scanning source model in TOPAS.

Authors:  Liyong Lin; Minglei Kang; Timothy D Solberg; Christopher G Ainsley; James E McDonough
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  A method to select aperture margin in collimated spot scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Dongxu Wang; Blake R Smith; Edgar Gelover; Ryan T Flynn; Daniel E Hyer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Assessment of uncertainties in radiation-induced cancer risk predictions at clinically relevant doses.

Authors:  J Nguyen; M Moteabbed; H Paganetti
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  A method for modeling laterally asymmetric proton beamlets resulting from collimation.

Authors:  Edgar Gelover; Dongxu Wang; Patrick M Hill; Ryan T Flynn; Mingcheng Gao; Steve Laub; Mark Pankuch; Daniel E Hyer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Monte Carlo study of the potential reduction in out-of-field dose using a patient-specific aperture in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Stephen J Dowdell; Benjamin Clasie; Nicolas Depauw; Peter Metcalfe; Anatoly B Rosenfeld; Hanne M Kooy; Jacob B Flanz; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Impact of spot size on plan quality of spot scanning proton radiosurgery for peripheral brain lesions.

Authors:  Dongxu Wang; Blake Dirksen; Daniel E Hyer; John M Buatti; Arshin Sheybani; Eric Dinges; Nicole Felderman; Mindi TenNapel; John E Bayouth; Ryan T Flynn
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Theoretical Benefits of Dynamic Collimation in Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Brain Tumors: Dosimetric and Radiobiological Metrics.

Authors:  Alexandra Moignier; Edgar Gelover; Dongxu Wang; Blake Smith; Ryan Flynn; Maura Kirk; Liyong Lin; Timothy Solberg; Alexander Lin; Daniel Hyer
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2015-10-08       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Comparing proton treatment plans of pediatric brain tumors in two pencil beam scanning nozzles with different spot sizes.

Authors:  John C Kralik; Liwen Xi; Timothy D Solberg; Charles B Simone; Liyong Lin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more
  9 in total

1.  Experimental and Monte Carlo characterization of a dynamic collimation system prototype for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Blake R Smith; Mark Pankuch; Daniel E Hyer; Wesley S Culberson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Trimmer sequencing time minimization during dynamically collimated proton therapy using a colony of cooperating agents.

Authors:  Blake R Smith; Daniel E Hyer; Ryan T Flynn; Patrick M Hill; Wesley S Culberson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  The dosimetric enhancement of GRID profiles using an external collimator in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Blake R Smith; Nicholas P Nelson; Theodore J Geoghegan; Kaustubh A Patwardhan; Patrick M Hill; Jen Yu; Alonso N Gutiérrez; Bryan G Allen; Daniel E Hyer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-02-21       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Investigating aperture-based approximations to model a focused dynamic collimation system for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Nicholas P Nelson; Wesley S Culberson; Daniel E Hyer; Blake R Smith; Ryan T Flynn; Patrick M Hill
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2022-02-18

5.  Mechanical Characterization and Validation of the Dynamic Collimation System Prototype for Proton Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Theodore Geoghegan; Kaustubh Patwardhan; Nicholas Nelson; Patrick Hill; Ryan Flynn; Blake Smith; Daniel Hyer
Journal:  J Med Device       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  An investigation into the robustness of dynamically collimated proton therapy treatments.

Authors:  Blake R Smith; Daniel E Hyer; Wesley S Culberson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Development and validation of the Dynamic Collimation Monte Carlo simulation package for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Authors:  Nicholas P Nelson; Wesley S Culberson; Daniel E Hyer; Theodore J Geoghegan; Kaustubh A Patwardhan; Blake R Smith; Ryan T Flynn; Jen Yu; Suresh Rana; Alonso N Gutiérrez; Patrick M Hill
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 4.506

8.  Proton therapy needs further technological development to fulfill the promise of becoming a superior treatment modality (compared to photon therapy).

Authors:  Daniel E Hyer; Xuanfeng Ding; Yi Rong
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Innovations and the Use of Collimators in the Delivery of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Daniel E Hyer; Laura C Bennett; Theodore J Geoghegan; Martin Bues; Blake R Smith
Journal:  Int J Part Ther       Date:  2021-06-25
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.