| Literature DB >> 31768192 |
Greg R Boyce1, Emile Gluck-Thaler2, Jason C Slot2, Jason E Stajich3, William J Davis4, Tim Y James4, John R Cooley5, Daniel G Panaccione1, Jørgen Eilenberg6, Henrik H De Fine Licht6, Angie M Macias1, Matthew C Berger1, Kristen L Wickert1, Cameron M Stauder1, Ellie J Spahr1, Matthew D Maust1, Amy M Metheny1, Chris Simon7, Gene Kritsky8, Kathie T Hodge9, Richard A Humber9,10, Terry Gullion11, Dylan P G Short12, Teiya Kijimoto1, Dan Mozgai13, Nidia Arguedas14, Matt T Kasson1.
Abstract
Entomopathogenic fungi routinely kill their hosts before releasing infectious spores, but a few species keep insects alive while sporulating, which enhances dispersal. Transcriptomics- and metabolomics-based studies of entomopathogens with post-mortem dissemination from their parasitized hosts have unraveled infection processes and host responses. However, the mechanisms underlying active spore transmission by Entomophthoralean fungi in living insects remain elusive. Here we report the discovery, through metabolomics, of the plant-associated amphetamine, cathinone, in four Massospora cicadina-infected periodical cicada populations, and the mushroom-associated tryptamine, psilocybin, in annual cicadas infected with Massospora platypediae or Massospora levispora, which likely represent a single fungal species. The absence of some fungal enzymes necessary for cathinone and psilocybin biosynthesis along with the inability to detect intermediate metabolites or gene orthologs are consistent with possibly novel biosynthesis pathways in Massospora. The neurogenic activities of these compounds suggest the extended phenotype of Massospora that modifies cicada behavior to maximize dissemination is chemically-induced.Entities:
Keywords: Amphetamine; Cathinone; Entomopathogen; Entomophthorales; Invertebrate pathology; Magicicada; Massospora; Okanagana; Platypedia; Psilocin; Psilocybin; Tryptamine; Zoopagomycota
Year: 2019 PMID: 31768192 PMCID: PMC6876628 DOI: 10.1016/j.funeco.2019.06.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Fungal Ecol ISSN: 1878-0083 Impact factor: 3.404
Fig. 1.Massospora-infected cicadas with associated spore morphology. (A) From left to right: Mas. cicadina-infected periodical cicada (Magicicada septendecim), Mas. levispora-infected Say’s cicada (Okanagana rimosa), and Mas. platypediae infected wing-banger cicada (Platypedia putnami) with a conspicuous conidial “plugs” emerging from the posterior end of the cicada; (B) close-up of conidia for each of three Massospora spp.; (D) posterior cross-section showing internal resting spore infection; and (E) close-up of resting spores for each of three Massospora spp. Specimens in B-F appear in same order as A. Mean (C) conidia and (F) resting spore dimensions for three Massospora species sampled from infected cicadas. Twenty-five conidia or resting spores were measured for each specimen except for Mas. levispora (MI) and Mas. aff. levispora (NM) resting spores, in which 50 spores were measured.
Sampling and storage of Massospora-infected cicadas and their asymptomatic cicada counterparts for morphological, molecular, metabolomics, and genomic studies. Sample origin refers to the authors/lab who collected specimens. Numbers before the slash denote conidial isolates whereas those after denote resting spore isolates. Bracketed numbers denote isolates for which sequences were deposited in NCBI Genbank.
| Cicada host/population | Year collected/processed | Sample origin | Sample storage | Tissues sampled | Morphology | Phylogenetics | Global Metabolomics | Targeted Metabolomics | Genomics | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1978/2017 | JRC/CS | In 95.0% ethanol @4 °C | Fungal spores (FS) | 1/0 | 1/0 | – | – | – | ||
| 1979/2017 | JRC/CS, RAH | Dried and pinned, RT | FS | 3/0 | 1/0 | – | – | – | ||
| 1998/2017 | JRC/CS | Dried and pinned, RT | FS | 1/0 | – | – | – | – | ||
| 2016/2017–2018 | MTK, NA, WJD | Freshly collected to −20 °C | FS | 5/0 | 3/0 [1] | 5/0 | 20/0 | 1/0 | ||
| 2017/2017–2018 | TG | Freshly collected to −20 °C | FS | 0/8 | 0/3 | 0/4 | 0/4 | – | ||
| 2002/2017–2018 | JRC/CS | In 95.0% ethanol @4 °C | FS, concentrated ethanol(CE) | 1/0 | – | – | 0/5 | – | ||
| 2003/2018 | JRC/CS | In 95.0% ethanol @4 °C | CE | – | – | – | 0/1 | – | ||
| 2004/2017 | GK | Dried and pinned, RT | FS | 1/0 | 1/0 | – | – | – | ||
| 2008/2017 | GK | Dried and pinned, RT | FS | 1/0 | 1/0 | – | – | – | ||
| 1998/2017 | JRC/CS | Dried and pinned, RT | FS | 0/3 | 1/0 | – | – | – | ||
| 2001/2018 | JRC/CS | In 95.0% ethanol @4 °C | CE | – | – | – | 3/0 | – | ||
| 1989, 1998, 2002, 2015/2017–2018 | JRC/CS, GK | In 95.0% ethanol @4 °C | FS, CE | 2/0 | 1/0 [1] | – | 0/4 | – | ||
| 1998/2017 | JRC/CS | In 95.0% ethanol @4 °C | CE | 8/1 | 3/0 [1] | – | 7/1 | – | ||
| 2017/2017–2018 | MTK | Freshly collected to −20 °C | FS | 14/1 | 3/0 [1] | 5/0 | 11/0 | 1/0 | ||
| None/healthy | 2016/2017–2018 | MTK | Freshly collected to −20 °C | Healthy abdomen (HA) | – | – | 1 | 1 | – | |
| None/healthy | 1998/2017–2018 | JRC/CS | In 95.0% ethanol @4 °C | HA | – | – | – | 1 | – | |
| None/healthy | 2017/2017–2018 | MTK | Freshly collected to −20 °C | HA | – | – | 1 | 1 | – | |
| None/healthy | 2018/2018 | MTK | Freshly collected to −80 °C | HA | – | – | – | 10 | – | |
| None/healthy | 2018/2018 | MTK | Freshly collected to −80 °C | HA | – | – | – | 10 | – | |
| Total | 50 | 18 | 16 | 79 | 2 |
Quantification of psilocyibn, psilocin, and cathinone from Massospora fungal plugs against commercially available, DEA-exempt analytical standards using targeted LC-MS. Samples that fell outside the limit of quantification were scored as either present or absent only.
| Sample type | Strain ID | Brood (Loc.[ | Spore type | Psilocybin [m/z 285] | Psilocin [m/z 205] | Cathinone [m/z 150] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present | Conc. [ng/mL] | ng/plug | Present | Conc. [μg/g] | ng/plug | Present | Conc. [ng/mL] | ng/plug | ||||
| MC139[ | VI (NC; 2017) | Resting spore | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | Yes | BLQ | BLQ | |
| MC140[ | VI (NC; 2017) | Resting spore | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | Yes | BLQ | BLQ | |
| MC141[ | VI (NC; 2017) | Resting spore | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | Yes | BLQ | BLQ | |
| MC142[ | VI (NC; 2017) | Resting spore | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | Yes | BLQ | BLQ | |
| MC10 | V (WV; 2016) | Conidia | – | – | – | – | – | – | Yes | BLQ | BLQ | |
| MC19 | V (WV; 2016) | Conidia | – | – | – | – | – | – | Yes | BLQ | BLQ | |
| MC23[ | V (WV; 2016) | Conidia | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | Yes | 24.3/11.6[ | 246.2/116.0[ | |
| MC33[ | V (WV; 2016) | Conidia | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | Yes | 29.9 | 303.0 | |
| MC99 | V (WV; 2016) | Conidia | – | – | – | – | – | – | Yes | 22.2 | 134.7 | |
| MC40 | V (WV; 2016) | Conidia | – | – | – | – | – | – | Yes | 7.3 | 44.3 | |
| G | VIII (PA; 2002) | Resting spore | – | – | – | – | – | – | Yes | 7.9 | 80.1 | |
| M | XXIII (IN; 2002) | Resting spore | – | – | – | – | – | – | Yes | 6.8 | 68.9 | |
| ML03 | (MI; 1998) | Resting spore | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| ML01 | (MI; 1998) | Conidia | Yes | 1.2 | 7.3 | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| ML02 | (MI; 1998) | Conidia | Yes | 2.3 | 13.9 | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| ML04 | (MI; 1998) | Conidia | Yes | 1.8 | 10.9 | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| ML05 | (MI; 1998) | Conidia | Yes | 2.2 | 13.3 | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| ML06 | (MI; 1998) | Conidia | Yes | BLQ | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| ML07 | (MI; 1998) | Conidia | Yes | 3.2 | 19.4 | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| ML08 | (MI; 1998) | Conidia | Yes | 2.8 | 17 | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| NM01 | (NM; 2017) | Conidia | Yes | – | – | Yes | 2.6 | 7.0 | ND | – | – | |
| NM02[ | (NM; 2017) | Conidia | Yes | – | – | Yes | 1.2 | 3.1 | ND | – | – | |
| NM03[ | (NM; 2017) | Conidia | Yes | – | – | Yes | 0.2 | 0.5 | ND | – | – | |
| NM04[ | (NM; 2017) | Conidia | Yes | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| NM05[ | (NM; 2017) | Conidia | Yes | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| NM06[ | (NM; 2017) | Conidia | Yes | – | – | Yes | 0.02 | 0.1 | ND | – | – | |
| NM07 | (NM; 2017) | Conidia | Yes | – | – | Yes | 0.3 | 0.8 | ND | – | – | |
| NM08 | (NM; 2017) | Conidia | Yes | – | – | Yes | 4.7 | 12.6 | ND | – | – | |
| NM09 | (NM; 2017) | Conidia | Yes | – | – | Yes | 1.4 | 3.7 | ND | – | – | |
| NM10 | (NM; 2017) | Conidia | Yes | – | – | Yes | 0.7 | 1.8 | ND | – | – | |
| NM14 | (NM; 2017) | Conidia | Yes | – | – | Yes | 0.5 | 1.3 | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy cicada | MCNC1 | V (WV; 2016) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy cicada | MCNC2 | V (WV; 2016) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy cicada | MLNC1 | (MI; 1998) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy cicada | MPNC01 | (NM; 2017) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy male | MM1 | VII (NY; 2018) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy male | MM2 | VII (NY; 2018) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy male | MM3 | VII (NY; 2018) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy male | MM4 | VII (NY; 2018) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy male | MM5 | VII (NY; 2018) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy female | MF1 | VII (NY; 2018) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy female | MF2 | VII (NY; 2018) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy female | MF3 | VII (NY; 2018) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy female | MF4 | VII (NY; 2018) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy female | MF5 | VII (NY; 2018) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy male | PM1 | (CA; 2018) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy male | PM2 | (CA; 2018) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy male | PM3 | (CA; 2018) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy male | PM4 | (CA; 2018) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy male | PM5 | (CA; 2018) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy female | PF1 | (CA; 2018) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy female | PF2 | (CA; 2018) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy female | PF3 | (CA; 2018) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy female | PF4 | (CA; 2018) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
| Healthy female | PF5 | (CA; 2018) | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | ND | – | – | |
ND, not detected.
BLQ, below limit of quantification.
U.S. state abbreviation.
Indicates samples were included in two independent runs.
Isolates used in global metabolomics studies.
Isolate from which metagenome was sequenced.
Fig. 2.Concatenated LSU + SSU maximum likelihood (ML) tree consisting of Massospora species and related species in the Entomophthorales. Given that Mas. levispora and Mas. platypediae were not genealogically exclusive, Mas. platypediae will be hereafter referred to as Mas. aff. levispora (NM). Bootstrap support is indicated near each node and only values greater than 70% are shown.
Fig. 3.Global metabolomics fold-change comparisons of (A) cathinone and (B) psilocybin among healthy cicada controls (posterior sections), Mas. cicadina (Mc), and Mas. aff. levispora (NM) (Mal) conidial plugs, and (C) cathinone between Mas. cicadina conidial plugs (Mc1) and resting spore plugs (Mc2). Value is average of five biological replicates. Fold change ± standard error based on comparisons with control.
Fig. 4.Representative LC-MS/MS spectra for (A) cathinone DEA-exempt analytical standard; (B) cathinone-positive Mas. cicadina conidial plugs from infected Magicicada spp.; (C) cathinone-negative Magicicada septendecim abdominal sample; (D) psilocybin DEA-exempt analytical standard; (E) psilocybin-positive Mas. aff. levispora (NM) conidial plugs from infected Platypedia putnami; (F) psilocybin-negative Platypedia putnami abdominal sample. M/z in red denote precursor fragmentwhile m/z in black denote observed fragments. All labeled m/z values from Massospora plugs (B and E) are within 10 ppm mass error compared to analytical standard.
Fig. 5.(A) Predicted cathinone biosynthesis pathways from Catha edulis (modified from Groves et al. 2015); (B) Putative regulatory motifs found upstream of candidate cathinone biosynthesis genes from Mas. cicadina and Mas. aff. levispora (NM) assemblies. Sequences were retrieved using profile HMMs of enzymes predicted for each pathway step. Candidate gene co-regulation was predicted by shared nucleotide motifs within 1500 bp upstream of predicted translational start sites. Only motifs associated with transaminase genes (predicted to catalyze the production of cathinone) are shown.
Fig. 6.(A) Psilocybin biosynthesis pathway from basidiomycete fungi; (B) Putative regulatory motifs found upstream of candidate psilocybin biosynthesis genes from both Mas. cicadina and Mas. aff. levispora (NM) assemblies. Sequences were retrieved using profile HMMs of enzymes predicted for each pathway step. Candidate gene co-regulation was predicted by shared nucleotide motifs within 1500 bp upstream of predicted translational start sites. Only motifs associated with methyltransferase genes (which catalyzes the formation of psilocybin) are shown.
Fig. 7.Phylogenomic relationships among behavior-modifying Entomophthoralean fungi, the behavioral and morphological host modifications they impose, and their host specificity. (A) RAxML phylogenetic tree ofEntomopthoralean fungi (Zoopagomycota) based on the concatenated alignment of >200 conserved orthologous protein sequences with overlaid behavioral modification in infected hosts. Actual number of protein sequences per taxon denoted in gray. (B) External sporulation patterns, (C) Heat map showing both the host range within and across select insect orders: Col: Coleoptera, Dip: Diptera, Hem: Hemiptera, Hym: Hymenoptera, Iso: Isoptera, Lep: Lepidoptera, Ort: Orthoptera, and Thy: Thysanoptera. The species Z. radicans and C. thromboides may represent broader species complexes, of which each phylogenetic species may have a narrower host spectrum. Photos used with permission from co-authors as well as Florian Freimoser, Joanna Maiagocka, Judith Pell, and Ruth Ahlburg