Literature DB >> 27104997

The Evolution of Sex-Specific Dominance in Response to Sexually Antagonistic Selection.

Hamish G Spencer, Nicholas K Priest.   

Abstract

Arguments about the evolutionary modification of genetic dominance have a long history in genetics, dating back more than 100 years. Mathematical investigations have shown that modifiers of the level of dominance at the locus of interest can spread at a reasonable rate only if heterozygotes at that locus are common. One hitherto neglected scenario is that of sexually antagonistic selection, which not only is ubiquitous in sexual species but also can generate stable high frequencies of heterozygotes that would appear to facilitate the spread of such modifiers. Here we present a mathematical model that shows that sexually specific dominance modification is a potential outcome of sexually antagonistic selection. Our model predicts that loci with higher levels of sexual conflict should exhibit greater differentiation between males and females in levels of dominance and that the strength of antagonistic selection experienced by one sex should be proportional to the level of dominance modification. We show that evidence from the literature is consistent with these predictions but suggest that empiricists should be alert to the possibility of there being numerous cases of sex-specific dominance. Further, in order to determine the significance of sexual conflict in the evolution of dominance, we need improved measures of sexual conflict and better characterization of loci that modify dominance of genes with sexually antagonistic fitness effects.

Keywords:  Fisher; Wright; genetic dominance; mathematical model; modification of dominance; sexual conflict

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27104997     DOI: 10.1086/685827

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  13 in total

1.  Sex-dependent dominance maintains migration supergene in rainbow trout.

Authors:  Devon E Pearse; Nicola J Barson; Torfinn Nome; Guangtu Gao; Matthew A Campbell; Alicia Abadía-Cardoso; Eric C Anderson; David E Rundio; Thomas H Williams; Kerry A Naish; Thomas Moen; Sixin Liu; Matthew Kent; Michel Moser; David R Minkley; Eric B Rondeau; Marine S O Brieuc; Simen Rød Sandve; Michael R Miller; Lucydalila Cedillo; Kobi Baruch; Alvaro G Hernandez; Gil Ben-Zvi; Doron Shem-Tov; Omer Barad; Kirill Kuzishchin; John Carlos Garza; Steven T Lindley; Ben F Koop; Gary H Thorgaard; Yniv Palti; Sigbjørn Lien
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 2.  Linking local adaptation with the evolution of sex differences.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Florence Débarre; Xiang-Yi Li
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Sexually antagonistic selection promotes genetic divergence between males and females in an ant.

Authors:  Pierre-André Eyer; Alexander J Blumenfeld; Edward L Vargo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Recessive Z-linked lethals and the retention of haplotype diversity in a captive butterfly population.

Authors:  Ilik J Saccheri; Samuel Whiteford; Carl J Yung; Arjen E Van't Hof
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Sex-specific dominance reversal of genetic variation for fitness.

Authors:  Karl Grieshop; Göran Arnqvist
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Dominance reversals and the maintenance of genetic variation for fitness.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Stephen F Chenoweth
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 8.029

7.  Genome-wide sexually antagonistic variants reveal long-standing constraints on sexual dimorphism in fruit flies.

Authors:  Filip Ruzicka; Mark S Hill; Tanya M Pennell; Ilona Flis; Fiona C Ingleby; Richard Mott; Kevin Fowler; Edward H Morrow; Max Reuter
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  An unbiased test reveals no enrichment of sexually antagonistic polymorphisms on the human X chromosome.

Authors:  Filip Ruzicka; Tim Connallon
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Accumulation of Deleterious Mutations Near Sexually Antagonistic Genes.

Authors:  Tim Connallon; Crispin Y Jordan
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 3.154

10.  Genetic responsiveness of African buffalo to environmental stressors: A role for epigenetics in balancing autosomal and sex chromosome interactions?

Authors:  Pim van Hooft; Eric R Dougherty; Wayne M Getz; Barend J Greyling; Bas J Zwaan; Armanda D S Bastos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.