| Literature DB >> 31766298 |
Qian Zhang1, Xue Chen1, Wandong Luo1, Heng Wu1, Xiangyang Liu1, Wang Chen1, Jianhong Tang1, Lijie Zhang2.
Abstract
In order to solve the problems of high energy consumption, complex process and low nitrogen removal efficiency in the currently available low carbon source wastewater treatment processes, a novel coagulation sedimentation/post-solid-phase denitrification biofilter process (CS-BAF-SPDB) was proposed. The effect of temperature on the nitrogen removal performance of BAF-SPDB was intensively studied, and the mechanism of the effect of temperature on nitrogen removal performance was analyzed from the perspective of microbial community structure by using the polymerase chain reaction denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (PCR-DGGE). The results showed that, to realize favorable nitrifying and denitrifying performance simultaneously in the BAF-SPDB unit, the operation temperature should be set above 18 °C. In addition, the influence of the macro operation parameters on the performance of the BAF and SPDB has a direct relationship with the dynamic changes of the micro microbial community. The influence of temperature on nitrification performance in BAF was mainly embodied in the change of composition, amount and activity of ammonia oxidizing bacteria Candidatus Nitrospira defluvii and nitrite oxidizing bacteria Nitrosomonas sp. Nm47, while that on denitrification performance in SPDB is mainly embodied in the change of composition and amount of solid carbon substrate degrading denitrifying bacteria Pseudomonas sp., Myxobacterium AT3-03 and heterotrophic denitrifying bacteria Dechloromonas agitate, Thauera aminoaromatica, Comamonas granuli and Rubrivivax gelatinosus.Entities:
Keywords: PCR-DGGE; biodegradable polymers; gas/water ratio; microbial community; post solid-phase denitrification
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31766298 PMCID: PMC6888237 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16224466
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Physical–chemical properties of the two biofilm carriers used in the experiment. Polycaprolactone, PCL.
| Carrier Type | Product Mark | Appearance Shape | Density (g/mL) | Diameter (mm) | Height (mm) | Molecular Weight (Dalton) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clay Ceramsite | PP-B 3.0 | pellet | 1.67 | 4–6 | - | - |
| PCL | 1400C | cylinder | 1.08 | 3 | 4 | 140,000 |
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the sedimentation/post-solid-phase denitrification biofilter (CS-P-SPDB) process cascade.
Universal Primer information.
| Primer | Sequence |
|---|---|
| 338F | CCT ACG GGA GGC AGC AG |
| 518R | ATT ACC GCG GCT GCT GG |
| GC338F | CGCCCGGGGCGCGCCCCGGGGCGGGGCGGGGGCGCGGGGGG |
Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) gel formulations.
| Reagent | 35% | 55% |
|---|---|---|
| 30% Acrylamide/Bis | 4 mL | 4 mL |
| 50 x TAE buffer | 0.3 mL | 0.3 mL |
| Formamide (deionized) | 2.1 mL | 3.3 mL |
| Urea | 2.205 g | 3.465 g |
| dH2O | To 15 mL | To 15 mL |
| APS | 120 μL | 120 μL |
| TEMED | 10 μL | 10 μL |
Figure 2Influence of temperature on effluent (a) nitrate, (b) ammonia, (c) nitrite and (d) TN concentration of biological aeration filters (BAF) and solid-phase denitrification biofilters (SPDB).
Figure 3Comparison of the DGGE patterns and quantitative analysis diagrams of biofilm samples taken from different gas/water ratio conditions: (a) BAF; (b) SPDB.
The analysis results of DGGE gel bands recovery sequence in BAF.
| The Analysis Results of DGGE Gel Bands Recovery Sequence | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Band Number | Similar Strain | Accession Number | Similarity | Classification |
| Band1 | Labilithrixluteola | NR_126182 | 98 | Proteobacteria Labilithrix |
| Band2 | uncultured bacterium | KC797661 | 99 | Bacteria; environmental samples |
| Band3 | Dechloromonasagitata | KF800710 | 98 | Proteobacteria Dechloromonas |
| Band4 | Lactococcus sp. R.M17 | HG937722 | 100 | Firmicutes Lactococcus |
| Band5 | Rubrivivaxgelatinosus | KF911343 | 99 | Proteobacteria Rubrivivax |
| Band6 | Gracilibacteria bacterium oral taxon 872 | JX294353 | 98 | Bacteria; Gracilibacteria |
| Band7 | Bosea sp. | AB974256 | 100 | Proteobacteria Bosea |
| Band8 | Nitrosomonas sp. Nm47 | AY123810 | 95 | Proteobacteria Nitrosomonas |
| Band9 | Acinetobacter sp. | KP636746 | 100 | Proteobacteria Acinetobacter |
| Band10 | Acinetobacter calcoaceticus | KR856228 | 100 | Proteobacteria Acinetobacter |
| Band11 | CandidatusNitrospiradefluvii | NR_074700 | 99 | Nitrospirae Nitrospira |
| Band12 | Acinetobacter bouvetii | KJ865593 | 100 | Proteobacteria Acinetobacter |
| Band13 | Bacillus sp. | KT452789 | 100 | Firmicutes Bacillus |
The analysis results of DGGE gel bands recovery sequence in SPDB.
| The Analysis Results of DGGE Gel Bands Recovery Sequence | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Band Number | Similar Strain | Accession Number | Similarity | Classification |
| Band1 | Dechloromonasagitata | KF800710 | 98 | Proteobacteria Dechloromonas |
| Band2 | Myxobacterium AT3-03 | AB246770 | 96 | Proteobacteria Myxococcales |
| Band3 | Pseudomonas sp. | KP711533 | 100 | Proteobacteria Pseudomonas |
| Band4 | Thaueraaminoaromatica | FJ609688 | 100 | Proteobacteria Thauera |
| Band5 | uncultured bacterium | FJ229147 | 96 | Bacteria; environmental samples |
| Band6 | Bosea sp. | AB974256 | 100 | Proteobacteria Bosea |
| Band7 | Nitrosomonas sp. Nm47 | AY123810 | 95 | Proteobacteria Nitrosomonas |
| Band8 | Acinetobacter sp. | KP636746 | 100 | Proteobacteria Acinetobacter |
| Band9 | Comamonasgranuli | NR_114013 | 98 | Proteobacteria Comamonas |
| Band10 | Acinetobacter haemolyticus | KT260794 | 100 | Proteobacteria Acinetobacter |
| Band11 | Acinetobacter sp. | KT361093 | 100 | Proteobacteria Acinetobacter |
| Band12 | Rubrivivaxgelatinosus | NR_074794 | 99 | Proteobacteria Rubrivivax |
| Band13 | Bacillus sp. | KT452789 | 100 | Firmicutes Bacillus |
| Band14 | Thiobacillusaquaesulis | LN794608 | 99 | Proteobacteria Thiobacillus |
Figure 4The phylogenetic tree of the main colonial species in BAF.
Figure 5The phylogenetic tree of the main colonial species in SPDB.
Figure 6Environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM) observations of surface of clay ceramsite with biofilm under (a) 26 °C, (b) 20 °C, (c) 18 °C, (d) 13°C and surface of PCL carrier with biofilm under (e) 26 °C, (f) 20 °C, (g) 18 °C, (h) 13 °C.