| Literature DB >> 31762631 |
Javad Hamedi1,2, Maghsoud Kafshnouchi1,2, Mohsen Ranjbaran3.
Abstract
Caves are oligotrophic, dark and less-explored environments and are considered as sources of promising microbial strains in biotechnology. Hampoeil Cave is located in massive dolomite with thin bedded limestone in northwestern of Iran. In an isolation and screening program, various samples from soil, water, floor, wall and ceiling of Hampoeil cave and its invertebrates were collected. Four various treatments and 10 different isolation media were used for the isolation of the actinobacteria. Screening of the isolates for antimicrobial activity against 10 bacteria and fungi, 5 hydrolytic enzymes production and resistance to 5 heavy metals have been performed. Among 33 various samples, 76 actinobacteria from various genera, including Streptomyces, Micromonospora, Micrococcus, Kocuria and Corynebacterium were isolated. Eighty percent of the strains had one of the studied hydrolytic enzyme activity. At least one type of antimicrobial activity was seen in 25.3% of the isolates. Resistance to one metal or more was seen in 26.32% of the isolates. The ratio of rare-actinobacteria in the oligotrophic samples to enriched samples is 20% more than Streptomyces. Percentage of strains with the highest activity in esterase, amylase, DNase, protease or lipase activity that were isolated from organic-rich environmental samples were 100, 100, 100, 82 and 82%, respectively. Also, 26.32% of the actinobacterial isolates resisted to heavy metals. It was concluded that Hampoeil cave is a good source in finding cave-living actinobacteria potent in producing hydrolytic enzymes and bioremediation.Entities:
Keywords: Actinobacteria; Biodiversity; Cave; Enzyme; Metal
Year: 2018 PMID: 31762631 PMCID: PMC6864206 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.10.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.219
Fig. 1Geographical location of Hampoeil Cave (Maragheh, East Azerbaijan Province, Iran). The rout and site samples were shown in the map.
Fig. 2Distribution of actinobacteria from various environmental samples of Hampoeil cave. Percentage of the actinobacterial isolates and (numbers of the isolates actinobacteria/the numbers of the samples) in each environment were shown.
Fig. 3Distribution of the actinobacterial isolates according the treatments and the isolation media.
The actinobacterial strains isolated from Hampoeil cave.
| No. | UTMC code | Nearest neighborhood | Similarity % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3161 | 100 | |
| 2 | 3162 | 99.8 | |
| 3 | 3163 | 99.82 | |
| 4 | 3164 | 99.80 | |
| 5 | 3165 | 100 | |
| 6 | 3166 | 99.45 | |
| 7 | 3167 | 100 | |
| 8 | 3168 | 100 | |
| 9 | 3169 | 99.82 | |
| 10 | 3170 | 99.61 | |
| 11 | 3171 | 99.80 | |
| 12 | 3172 | 98.21 | |
| 13 | 3173 | 98.85 | |
| 14 | 3174 | 100 | |
| 15 | 3175 | 100 | |
| 16 | 3176 | 99.62 | |
| 17 | 3177 | 100 | |
| 18 | 3178 | 99.61 | |
| 19 | 3180 | 99.60 | |
| 20 | 3181 | 99.63 | |
| 21 | 3182 | 99.81 | |
| 22 | 3183 | 99.28 | |
| 23 | 3185 | 99.81 | |
| 24 | 3186 | 99.64 | |
| 25 | 3187 | 100 | |
| 26 | 3188 | 100 | |
| 27 | 3189 | 99.64 | |
| 28 | 3190 | 100 | |
| 29 | 3191 | 99.19 | |
| 30 | 3192 | 99.74 | |
| 31 | 3193 | 99.13 | |
| 32 | 3194 | 100 | |
| 33 | 3195 | 100 | |
| 34 | 3196 | 100 | |
| 35 | 3197 | 99.71 | |
| 36 | 3199 | 99.73 | |
| 37 | 3201 | 100 | |
| 38 | 3202 | 99.47 | |
| 39 | 3204 | 99.82 | |
| 40 | 3224 | 99.87 | |
| 41 | 3226 | 99.47 | |
| 42 | 3227 | 99.87 | |
| 43 | 3228 | 99.88 | |
| 44 | 3229 | 99.62 | |
| 45 | 3230 | 100 | |
| 46 | 3231 | 100 | |
| 47 | 3232 | 99.01 | |
| 48 | 3233 | 100 | |
| 49 | 3234 | 99.47 | |
| 50 | 3235 | 100 | |
| 51 | 3236 | 100 | |
| 52 | 3237 | 99.61 | |
| 53 | 3238 | 99.67 | |
| 54 | 3239 | 99.62 | |
| 55 | 3240 | 99.87 | |
| 56 | 3241 | 99.60 | |
| 57 | 3242 | 99.80 | |
| 58 | 3243 | 99.72 | |
| 59 | 3244 | 98.74 | |
| 60 | 3245 | 99.55 | |
| 61 | 3246 | 99.61 | |
| 62 | 3247 | 100 | |
| 63 | 3249 | 98.47 | |
| 64 | 3252 | 99.21 | |
| 65 | 3253 | 99.80 | |
| 66 | 3254 | 100 | |
| 67 | 3255 | 99.80 | |
| 68 | 3256 | 99.75 | |
| 69 | 3257 | 99.47 | |
| 70 | 3258 | 99.87 | |
| 71 | 3259 | 99.54 | |
| 72 | 3260 | 99.88 | |
| 73 | 3261 | 99.87 | |
| 74 | 3262 | 99.82 | |
| 75 | 3263 | 100 | |
| 76 | 3264 | 99.49 |
Hydrolytic enzyme activities in the strains isolated from Hampoeil cave. + and – are used for positive and negative results, respectively. More activity was shown by more +.
| UTMC code | Esterase | Amylase | DNase | Protease | Lipase |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| + | ++ | + | ++ | ||
| + | ++ | ++ | |||
| ++ | + | ||||
| + | +++ | + | ++ | ||
| ++ | ++ | + | |||
| +++ | + | ||||
| +++ | + | ||||
| + | ++ | ||||
| + | ++++ | + | ++ | + | |
| ++ | + | ++ | ++ | + | |
| + | ++ | ++ | |||
| + | ++ | ||||
| + | + | ||||
| + | ++ | + | |||
| + | + | + | + | ||
| +++ | + | + | |||
| + | |||||
| + | + | + | +++ | ||
| + | + | ||||
| + | |||||
| + | ++ | + | ++ | ||
| +++ | +++ | ++ | ++ | ||
| + | ++ | ++ | + | ||
| + | |||||
| + | +++ | + | |||
| ++ | + | ||||
| ++ | + | ||||
| + | ++ | + | |||
| + | ++ | ||||
| + | |||||
| +++ | + | ||||
| + | +++ | + | + | ||
| + | ++ | ||||
| + | |||||
| + | ++ | ||||
| + | ++ | + | |||
| + | ++ | + | |||
| + | ++ | ||||
| + | ++ | + | |||
| + | ++ | ||||
| + | + | + | |||
| + | + | ||||
| + | |||||
| + | ++ | ++ | + | ||
| ++ | |||||
| + | ++ | ||||
| +++ | +++ | + | |||
| + | +++ | +++ | |||
| +++ | +++ | +++ | + | ||
| ++ | ++ | + | |||
| ++ | ++ | + | |||
| + | ++ | + | + | ||
| + | ++ | +++ | |||
| ++ | +++ | ||||
| +++ | ++ | + | +++ | ||
| + | +++ | + | +++ | ||
| + | +++ | + | +++ | ||
| ++ | +++ | + | ++ | ||
| + | +++ | + | +++ | ||
| ++ | +++ | + | +++ | + | |
| + | ++ | + | +++ | + |
The strains isolated from Hampoeil cave with antimicrobial activity. 1: Micrococcus luteus UTMC1461, 2: Escherichia coli TolC UTMC1462, 3: Pseudomonas aeruginosa UTMC1463, 4: Bacillus subtilis UTMC1464, 5: Escherichia coli UTMC1465, 6: Chromobacterium violaceum UTMC1466, 7: Staphylococcus aureus UTMC1467, 8: Candida albicans UTMC5055, 9: Pichia anomola UTMC5056 and 10: Mucor hiemalis UTMC5057.
| Actinobacterial isolate | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30 | – | – | 18 | – | |
| 14 | – | – | – | – | |
| 15 | – | – | – | – | |
| 14 | – | – | – | – | |
| 13 | – | – | – | – | |
| 25 | – | – | 12 | – | |
| 20 | 20 | – | 22 | – | |
| 14 | – | – | – | – | |
| 30 | – | – | – | – | |
| 23 | 17 | 17 | 22 | – | |
| 18 | – | – | – | – | |
| 23 | – | 27 | – | – | |
| 29 | – | – | – | – | |
| 23 | – | – | – | – | |
| 13 | – | – | – | – | |
| 16 | – | – | – | – | |
| – | 23 | – | – | 28 | |
| 27 | – | – | – | 11 | |
| – | – | 23 | 17 | – | |
| 20 | 16 | – | – | 12 | |
| 25 | 24 | – | – | – | |
| 17 | – | – | – | – | |
| 28 | 20 | – | – | – |
Metal resistance in the strains isolated from Hampoeil cave with antimicrobial activity. R: resistant, S: sensitive.
| UTMC code | Zn (35 mM) | Cu (3 mM) | Cd (2.5 mM) | Ni (15 mM) | Pb (5 mM) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | S | S | S | S | |
| S | S | S | R | R | |
| R | S | R | R | S | |
| S | R | R | R | R | |
| R | R | S | S | R | |
| R | S | S | R | S | |
| R | R | S | R | R | |
| R | S | S | S | S | |
| R | R | R | R | R | |
| R | S | S | S | S | |
| S | R | S | S | S | |
| S | S | S | R | S | |
| S | S | S | R | ||
| S | S | ||||
| S | S | S | S | ||
| R | R | R | R | R | |
| R | S | S | R | R |