Sangwoo Lee1, Eun Kyung Choe2,3, Hae Yeon Kang4, Ji Won Yoon4, Hua Sun Kim5. 1. Samsung Electronics, Suwon, South Korea. 2. Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, 39FL Gangnam Finance Center 152, Teheran-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 135-984, South Korea. snuhcr@naver.com. 3. Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. snuhcr@naver.com. 4. Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, South Korea. 5. Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul, South Korea.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Osteoporosis is hard to detect before it manifests symptoms and complications. In this study, we evaluated machine learning models for identifying individuals with abnormal bone mineral density (BMD) through an analysis of spine X-ray features extracted by deep learning to alert high-risk osteoporosis populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively used data obtained from health check-ups including spine X-ray and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Consecutively, we selected people with normal and abnormal bone mineral density. From the regions of interest of X-ray images, deep convolutional networks were used to generate image features. We designed prediction models for abnormal BMD using the image features trained by machine learning classification algorithms. The performances of each model were evaluated. RESULTS: From 334 participants, 170 images of abnormal (T scores < - 1.0 standard deviations (SD)) and 164 of normal BMD (T scores > = - 1.0 SD) were used for analysis. We found that a combination of feature extraction by VGGnet and classification by random forest based on the maximum balanced classification rate (BCR) yielded the best performance in terms of the area under the curve (AUC) (0.74), accuracy (0.71), sensitivity (0.81), specificity (0.60), BCR (0.70), and F1-score (0.73). CONCLUSION: In this study, we explored various machine learning algorithms for the prediction of BMD using simple spine X-ray image features extracted by three deep learning algorithms. We identified the combination for the best performance in predicting high-risk populations with abnormal BMD.
OBJECTIVE:Osteoporosis is hard to detect before it manifests symptoms and complications. In this study, we evaluated machine learning models for identifying individuals with abnormal bone mineral density (BMD) through an analysis of spine X-ray features extracted by deep learning to alert high-risk osteoporosis populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively used data obtained from health check-ups including spine X-ray and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Consecutively, we selected people with normal and abnormal bone mineral density. From the regions of interest of X-ray images, deep convolutional networks were used to generate image features. We designed prediction models for abnormal BMD using the image features trained by machine learning classification algorithms. The performances of each model were evaluated. RESULTS: From 334 participants, 170 images of abnormal (T scores < - 1.0 standard deviations (SD)) and 164 of normal BMD (T scores > = - 1.0 SD) were used for analysis. We found that a combination of feature extraction by VGGnet and classification by random forest based on the maximum balanced classification rate (BCR) yielded the best performance in terms of the area under the curve (AUC) (0.74), accuracy (0.71), sensitivity (0.81), specificity (0.60), BCR (0.70), and F1-score (0.73). CONCLUSION: In this study, we explored various machine learning algorithms for the prediction of BMD using simple spine X-ray image features extracted by three deep learning algorithms. We identified the combination for the best performance in predicting high-risk populations with abnormal BMD.
Authors: Jennifer J Y Lee; Elaheh Aghdassi; Angela M Cheung; Stacey Morrison; Anne Cymet; Valentina Peeva; Carolyn Neville; Sara Hewitt; Deborah DaCosta; Christian Pineau; Janet Pope; Paul R Fortin Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2012-06-01 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Bjoern H Menze; B Michael Kelm; Ralf Masuch; Uwe Himmelreich; Peter Bachert; Wolfgang Petrich; Fred A Hamprecht Journal: BMC Bioinformatics Date: 2009-07-10 Impact factor: 3.169
Authors: Changhyun Lee; Eun Kyung Choe; Sue Kyung Park; Sang-Heon Cho; Ji Min Choi; Yunji Hwang; Young Lee; Boram Park; Su Jin Chung; Min-Sun Kwak; Jong-Eun Lee; Joo Sung Kim Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-04-19 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Tae Yang Yu; Hyemin Cho; Tae Young Kim; Yong Chan Ha; Sunmee Jang; Ha Young Kim Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2018-01-15 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Yangyang Cui; Jia Zhu; Zhili Duan; Zhenhua Liao; Song Wang; Weiqiang Liu Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-09-16 Impact factor: 4.614