Literature DB >> 33590305

Hanging protocol optimization of lumbar spine radiographs with machine learning.

Gene Kitamura1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether machine learning algorithms can be utilized to optimize the hanging protocol of lumbar spine radiographs. Specifically, we explored whether machine learning models can accurately label lumbar spine views/positions, detect hardware, and rotate the lateral views to straighten the image.
METHODS: We identified 1727 patients with 6988 lumbar spine radiographs. The view (anterior-posterior, right oblique, left oblique, left lateral, right lateral, left lumbosacral or right lumbosacral), hardware (present or not present), dynamic position (neutral, flexion, or extension), and correctional rotation of each radiograph were manually documented by a board-certified radiologist. Various output metrics were calculated, including area under the curve (AUC) for the categorical output models (view, hardware, and dynamic position). For non-binary categories, an all-versus-other technique was utilized designating one category as true and all others as false, allowing for a binary evaluation (e.g., AP vs. non-AP or extension vs. non-extension). For correctional rotation, the degree of rotation required to straighten the lateral spine radiograph was documented. The mean absolute difference was calculated between the ground truth and model-predicted value reported in degrees of rotation. Ensembles of the rotation models were created. We evaluated the rotation models on 3 test dataset splits: only 0 rotation, only non-0 rotation, and all cases.
RESULTS: The AUC values for the categorical models ranged from 0.985 to 1.000. For the only 0 rotation data, the ensemble combining the absolute minimum value between the 20- and 60-degree models performed best (mean absolute difference of 0.610). For the non-0 rotation data, the ensemble merging the absolute maximum value between the 40- and 160-degree models performed best (mean absolute difference of 4.801). For the all cases split, the ensemble combining the minimum value of the 20- and 40-degree models performed best (mean absolute difference of 3.083).
CONCLUSION: Machine learning techniques can be successfully implemented to optimize lumbar spine x-ray hanging protocols by accounting for views, hardware, dynamic position, and rotation correction.
© 2021. ISS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hanging protocol; Lumbar spine; Machine learning; Radiographs; Workflow

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33590305      PMCID: PMC8277694          DOI: 10.1007/s00256-021-03733-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.128


  12 in total

1.  Automatic detection and segmentation of lumbar vertebrae from X-ray images for compression fracture evaluation.

Authors:  Kang Cheol Kim; Hyun Cheol Cho; Tae Jun Jang; Jong Mun Choi; Jin Keun Seo
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Computerized Bone Age Estimation Using Deep Learning Based Program: Evaluation of the Accuracy and Efficiency.

Authors:  Jeong Rye Kim; Woo Hyun Shim; Hee Mang Yoon; Sang Hyup Hong; Jin Seong Lee; Young Ah Cho; Sangki Kim
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Deep learning evaluation of pelvic radiographs for position, hardware presence, and fracture detection.

Authors:  Gene Kitamura
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2020-06-21       Impact factor: 3.528

4.  Deep learning of lumbar spine X-ray for osteopenia and osteoporosis screening: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Bin Zhang; Keyan Yu; Zhenyuan Ning; Ke Wang; Yuhao Dong; Xian Liu; Shuxue Liu; Jian Wang; Cuiling Zhu; Qinqin Yu; Yuwen Duan; Siying Lv; Xintao Zhang; Yanjun Chen; Xiaojia Wang; Jie Shen; Jia Peng; Qiuying Chen; Yu Zhang; Xiaodong Zhang; Shuixing Zhang
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Automatic Hip Fracture Identification and Functional Subclassification with Deep Learning.

Authors:  Justin D Krogue; Kaiyang V Cheng; Kevin M Hwang; Paul Toogood; Eric G Meinberg; Erik J Geiger; Musa Zaid; Kevin C McGill; Rina Patel; Jae Ho Sohn; Alexandra Wright; Bryan F Darger; Kevin A Padrez; Eugene Ozhinsky; Sharmila Majumdar; Valentina Pedoia
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2020-03-25

6.  Convolutional Neural Networks for Automated Fracture Detection and Localization on Wrist Radiographs.

Authors:  Yee Liang Thian; Yiting Li; Pooja Jagmohan; David Sia; Vincent Ern Yao Chan; Robby T Tan
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2019-01-30

7.  Artificial intelligence for analyzing orthopedic trauma radiographs.

Authors:  Jakub Olczak; Niklas Fahlberg; Atsuto Maki; Ali Sharif Razavian; Anthony Jilert; André Stark; Olof Sköldenberg; Max Gordon
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Binomial Classification of Pediatric Elbow Fractures Using a Deep Learning Multiview Approach Emulating Radiologist Decision Making.

Authors:  Jesse C Rayan; Nakul Reddy; J Herman Kan; Wei Zhang; Ananth Annapragada
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2019-01-30

9.  An Application of Artificial Intelligence to Diagnostic Imaging of Spine Disease: Estimating Spinal Alignment From Moiré Images.

Authors:  Kota Watanabe; Yoshimitsu Aoki; Morio Matsumoto
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-12-31

10.  Multimodal Machine Learning-based Knee Osteoarthritis Progression Prediction from Plain Radiographs and Clinical Data.

Authors:  Aleksei Tiulpin; Stefan Klein; Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra; Jérôme Thevenot; Esa Rahtu; Joyce van Meurs; Edwin H G Oei; Simo Saarakkala
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.