Literature DB >> 31755063

Overview on GHG emissions of raw milk production and a comparison of milk and cheese carbon footprints of two different systems from northern Spain.

Amanda Laca1, Natalia Gómez1, Adriana Laca2, Mario Díaz1.   

Abstract

Milk production has been estimated to contribute 3-4% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. However, the carbon footprint associated with raw milk can vary, depending on a variety of factors, such as the geographical area, species of cow and production system. In this study, a global overview of research published on the carbon footprint (CF) of raw cow milk is provided. Additionally, two different dairy systems (semi-confinement and pasture-based) have been analysed by life-cycle assessment (LCA) in order to determine their effect on the CF of the milk produced. Inventory data were obtained directly from these facilities, and the main factors involved in milk production were included (co-products, livestock food, water, electricity, diesel, cleaning elements, transport, manure and slurry management, gas emissions to air etc.). In agreement with reviewed literature, it was found that the carbon footprint of milk was basically determined by the cattle feeding system and gas emissions from the cows. The values of milk CF found in the systems under study were within the range for cow milk production worldwide (0.9-4.7 kgCO2eq kgFPCM-1). Specifically, in the semi-confinement and the pasture-based dairy farms, 1.22 and 0.99 kgCO2eq kgFPCM-1 were obtained, respectively. The environmental benefits obtained with the pasture grazing system are not only mainly due to the lower use of purchased fodder but also to the allocation between milk and meat that was found to be a determining methodological factor in CF calculation. Finally, data from the evaluated dairy systems have been employed to analyse the influence of raw milk production on cheese manufacturing. With this aim, the CF of a small-scale cheese factory has also been obtained. The main subsystems involved (raw materials, water, electricity, energy, cleaning products, packaging materials, transport, wastes and gas emissions) were included in the inventory of the cheese factory. CF values were 16.6 and 14.7 kgCO2eq kg-1 of cheese for milk produced in semi-confinement and pasture-based systems, respectively. The production of raw milk represented more than 60% of CO2eq emissions associated with cheese, so the primary production is the critical factor in reducing the GHG emissions due to cheese making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon footprint; Cheese; Dairy farm; LCA; Pasture-based; Raw milk production; Semi-confinement

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31755063     DOI: 10.1007/s11356-019-06857-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int        ISSN: 0944-1344            Impact factor:   4.223


  16 in total

1.  Integration of ecosystem services into the carbon footprint of milk of South German dairy farms.

Authors:  Lukas Robert Kiefer; Friederike Menzel; Enno Bahrs
Journal:  J Environ Manage       Date:  2015-01-17       Impact factor: 6.789

2.  Life cycle assessment of cheese production process in a small-sized dairy industry in Brazil.

Authors:  Hudson Carlos Maia Santos; Henrique Leonardo Maranduba; José Adolfo de Almeida Neto; Luciano Brito Rodrigues
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Development and testing of the Product Environmental Footprint Milk Tool: A comprehensive LCA tool for dairy products.

Authors:  Jacopo Famiglietti; Matteo Guerci; Carlo Proserpio; Pieter Ravaglia; Mario Motta
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Modelling the interactions between C and N farm balances and GHG emissions from confinement dairy farms in northern Spain.

Authors:  A Del Prado; K Mas; G Pardo; P Gallejones
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  How can farming intensification affect the environmental impact of milk production?

Authors:  L Bava; A Sandrucci; M Zucali; M Guerci; A Tamburini
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Climate mitigation by dairy intensification depends on intensive use of spared grassland.

Authors:  David Styles; Alejandra Gonzalez-Mejia; Jon Moorby; Andreas Foskolos; James Gibbons
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 10.863

7.  Recoupling Industrial Dairy Feedlots and Industrial Farmlands Mitigates the Environmental Impacts of Milk Production in China.

Authors:  Xing Fan; Jie Chang; Yuan Ren; Xu Wu; Yuanyuan Du; Ronghua Xu; Dong Liu; Scott X Chang; Laura A Meyerson; Changhui Peng; Ying Ge
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 9.028

8.  Environmental impact of cheese production: A case study of a small-scale factory in southern Europe and global overview of carbon footprint.

Authors:  Fernando Canellada; Amanda Laca; Adriana Laca; Mario Díaz
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Environmental impacts and resource use of milk production on the North China Plain, based on life cycle assessment.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Wang; Stewart Ledgard; Jiafa Luo; Yongqin Guo; Zhanqin Zhao; Liang Guo; Song Liu; Nannan Zhang; Xueqin Duan; Lin Ma
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 7.963

10.  Carbon footprint of Canadian dairy products: calculations and issues.

Authors:  X P C Vergé; D Maxime; J A Dyer; R L Desjardins; Y Arcand; A Vanderzaag
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2013-07-05       Impact factor: 4.034

View more
  7 in total

1.  Carbon footprint in Latin American dairy systems.

Authors:  José Velarde-Guillén; Claudia Arndt; Carlos A Gómez
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Milk carbon footprint of silvopastoral dairy systems in the Northern Peruvian Amazon.

Authors:  Deysi Ruiz-Llontop; José Velarde-Guillén; Eduardo Fuentes; Melisa Prudencio; Carlos Gómez
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 1.893

Review 3.  Host genetics associated with gut microbiota and methane emission in cattle.

Authors:  Sudarshan Mahala; Anju Kala; Amit Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Carbon Footprint Assessment of Spanish Dairy Cattle Farms: Effectiveness of Dietary and Farm Management Practices as a Mitigation Strategy.

Authors:  Ridha Ibidhi; Sergio Calsamiglia
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 5.  Examining the Environmental Impacts of the Dairy and Baby Food Industries: Are First-Food Systems a Crucial Missing Part of the Healthy and Sustainable Food Systems Agenda Now Underway?

Authors:  Daniel H Pope; Johan O Karlsson; Phillip Baker; David McCoy
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Changing Dietary Behavior for Better Biodiversity Preservation: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Wajdi Belgacem; Konstadinos Mattas; George Arampatzis; George Baourakis
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Sustainability of Four Dairy Farming Scenarios in an Alpine Environment: The Case Study of Toma di Lanzo Cheese.

Authors:  Tibor Verduna; Simone Blanc; Valentina Maria Merlino; Paolo Cornale; Luca Maria Battaglini
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-10-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.