| Literature DB >> 31752282 |
Fang-Yao Li1,2, Lin Huang2, Qian Li2, Xiu Wang1, Xian-Li Ma2, Cai-Na Jiang2, Xiao-Qun Zhou3, Wen-Gui Duan1, Fu-Hou Lei4.
Abstract
To discover novel potent cytotoxic diterpenoids, a series of hybrids of dehydroabietic acid containing 1,2,3-triazole moiety were designed and synthesized. The target compounds were characterized by means of FT-IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, ESI-MS and elemental analysis techniques. The in vitro cytotoxicity of these compounds was evaluated by standard MTT (methyl thiazolytetrazolium) assay against CNE-2 (nasopharynx), HepG2 (liver), HeLa (epithelial cervical), BEL-7402 (liver) human carcinoma cell lines and human normal liver cell (HL-7702). The screening results revealed that most of the hybrids showed significantly improved cytotoxicity over parent compound DHAA. Among them, [1-(3-fluorobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-yl]dehydroabietic acid methyl ester (3c), and [1-(2-nitrobenzyl)-1H-1,2,3-triazole-4-yl]dehydroabietic acid methyl ester (3k) displayed better antiproliferative activity with IC50 (50% inhibitory concentration) values of 5.90 ± 0.41 and 6.25 ± 0.37 µM toward HepG2 cells compared to cisplatin, while they exhibited lower cytotoxicity against HL-7702. Therefore, the 1,2,3-triazole-hybrids could be a promising strategy for the synthesis of antitumor diterpenoids and it also proved the essential role of 1,2,3-triazole moiety of DHAA in the biological activity.Entities:
Keywords: 1,2,3-ttriazole; antiproliferative activity; click chemistry; dehydroabietic acid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31752282 PMCID: PMC6891475 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24224191
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Synthesis of dehydroabietic acid-1,2,3-triazole hybrids. Reagents and conditions: (i) propargyl bromide, anhydrous potassium carbonate, DMF, RT, 4 h, yield 86.3%; (ii) benzyl chloride/bromide, NaN3, CuI, DMF/H2O, RT, 5 h, yield 40.2–60.4%.
Antiproliferative activity of dehydroabietic acid-based 1,2,3-triazole compounds a.
| Compound | IC50 (μM) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNE-2 | HepG2 | BEL-7402 | HeLa | HL-7702 | |
| 33.40 ± 0.33 | >100 | 36.44 ± 070 | 67.88 ± 0.56 | >100 | |
| 21.44 ± 0.52 | 25.86 ± 0.27 | 18.63 ± 0.82 | 17.76 ± 0.31 | >100 | |
| 10.92 ± 0.21 | 5.90 ± 0.41 | 16.72 ± 0.06 | 20.05 ± 0.54 | >100 | |
| 12.20 ± 0.33 | 20.60 ± 0.09 | 14.84 ± 075 | 22.33 ± 0.35 | >100 | |
| 74.88 ± 0.14 | 45.08 ± 0.33 | 25.06 ± 0.32 | 44.28 ± 0.43 | >100 | |
| 59.03 ± 0.28 | 22.27 ± 0.35 | 26.09 ± 0.15 | 53.78 ± 0.32 | >100 | |
| 60.73 ± 066 | >100 | 38.04 ± 0.48 | >100 | >100 | |
| 48.30 ± 0.27 | 35.42 ± 0.21 | 27.26 ± 0.36 | 25.90 ± 0.20 | >100 | |
| 44.14 ± 0.22 | 40.66 ± 0.62 | 36.88 ± 0.23 | 56.08 ± 0.36 | >100 | |
| >100 | 23.40 ± 0.32 | 14.53 ± 0.62 | 43.18 ± 0.22 | >100 | |
| 44.90 ± 0.32 | 6.25 ± 0.37 | 18.62 ± 0.26 | >100 | >100 | |
| 11.45 ± 0.18 | 15.83 ± 0.64 | 15.39 ± 0.51 | 67.37 ± 0.33 | >100 | |
| 19.61 ± 0.38 | >100 | 22.81 ± 0.22 | 22.48 ± 0.35 | >100 | |
| >100 | 60.18 ± 0.39 | 23.61 ± 0.44 | 25.32 ± 0.81 | >100 | |
| >100 | 51.78 ± 0.43 | 41.89 ± 0.72 | 42.51 ± 0.37 | >100 | |
| 80.98 ± 0.78 | >100 | 25.03 ± 0.22 | 24.66 ± 0.16 | >100 | |
| DHAA | 88.64 ± 0.73 | 80.36 ± 0.84 | 46.70 ± 0.55 | 37.40 ± 0.64 | >100 |
| Cisplatin | 8.75 ± 0.24 | 6.42 ± 0.18 | 12.68 ± 0.33 | 1.94 ± 0.20 | 20.76 ± 0.83 |
a IC50 values are expressed as the mean ± SD (standard deviation) from three independent experiments. The results indicate statistically significant differences at p < 0.05.