| Literature DB >> 31750626 |
Dan-Qing Guo1, Miao Yu2, Shun-Cong Zhang3, Yong-Chao Tang3, Yun Tian4, Da-Xing Li5, Guo-Ye Mo3, Yong-Xian Li1, Hui-Zhi Guo1, Pei-Jie Luo1, Teng-Peng Zhou1, Yan-Huai Ma1, Yusupov Abdukodir1, Pan-Jie Liu1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Treatment for osteoporotic vertebral fracture (OVF) with cord compression is challenging and it usually requires surgical interventions to decompress nerves and restore spinal sequences. To describe a novel surgical strategy for treating OVFs with cord compression.Entities:
Keywords: CT Scan; Osteoporotic fracture; Spinal Cord Compression; Surgery
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31750626 PMCID: PMC6904606 DOI: 10.1111/os.12558
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Orthop Surg ISSN: 1757-7853 Impact factor: 2.071
Figure 1Comparison of vertebral height and posterior bony protrusion before and after extension CT. A supine CT scan shows that T12 is compressed by half (A), and the posterior bony fragment occupies the spinal canal (D); an image of a patient undergoing extension CT (B); observed on extension CT, the height is restored by more than 50% (C), and the spinal canal is decompressed (E).
Figure 2Representative case of type1.2 OVF. An 82‐year‐old female underwent VP at T12, posterolateral autologous bone fusion and instrumentation from T10 to L2 with augmented pedicle screw fixation. Preoperative lateral radiographs (A) and T2‐weighted MRI scans (B, C) show T12 fracture with dural compression. Height restoration and canal decompression are shown on extension CT (E, D), but multiple fracture lines are present in the posterior fragments (E). Postoperative lateral radiograph at 1 week (G). Six years later, she suffered another fracture at T6 (H) and underwent PVP. Postoperative radiographs (I, J).
Figure 3Representative case of type 2 OVF. A 77‐year‐old female underwent corpectomy at T12, reconstruction with a hydroxyapatite cage and intervertebral autologous bone fusion combined with instrumentation from T10 to L2 with augmented pedicle screw fixation. Preoperative lateral radiographs (A) and T2‐weighted MRI scans (D, E) show significant T12 collapse with dural compression. Barely no height restoration or canal decompression are shown on extension CT (B, C). Postoperative lateral radiograph (F) and CT scans (G, H) at 1 week (F) and 2 years (I, J) do not show instrumentation failure.
Figure 4Representative case of type 2 OVF. A 76‐year‐old female underwent VP and limited laminectomy at L1, combined with posterolateral bone fusion and instrumentation from T11 to L3 with augmented pedicle screw fixation. Preoperative lateral radiographs (A) and T2‐weighted MRI scans (B,C) show that significant T12 collapse with dural compression. Barely any height restoration or canal decompression is shown on extension CT (D, E). Intraoperative fluoroscopy (G) shows restoration of the vertebral height without dural decompression on myelography (H, I). Postoperative CT scans (J, K) and lateral radiographs (L, I).
Figure 5Algorithm of the surgical strategy for treating OVFs with cord compression. Modifier: Patients in this subgroup achieved >50% anterior height restoration in the extended prone position under general anesthesia; OVF: osteoporotic vertebral fracture; PLF: posterolateral fusion.
Pre‐and postoperative clinical outcomes
| Indexes | Preoperative | One week postoperative | Two years postoperative | Last follow‐up | Value |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VAS | 8 (7,9) | 4 (2, 5) | 2 (1,3) |
| <0.01 | |
| ODI (%) | 75.5 (67.2,80.0) | 45.1 (28.2,56.8) | 31 (24.0,37.0) |
| <0.01 | |
| Kyphotic angle (°) | 22.3 (17.1,33.8) | 7.4 (3.0, 10.9) | 8.5 (6.0,12.7) | 10.4 (6.4,15.3) |
| <0.01 |
Compared to preoperation, P < 0.05.
Compared to 1 week postoperation, P < 0.05.
For the χ2 test, the data of Frankel grades D and C were pooled.
Neurological evaluation by Frankel's grade before surgery and at final follow‐up
| Frankel's grade | Pre‐op No. of cases | Final follow‐up | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | D | E | ||
| C | 8 | 0 | 3 | 5 |
| D | 23 | 0 | 5 | 15 |
| E | 25 | 0 | 0 | 22 |
| Sum | 56 | 0 | 8 | 42 |
Significance of neurological recovery at the last follow‐up compared to preoperation. Value (X2) = 17.594, P < 0.01.
Clinical data of each type
| No. of cases | FS | RF | Local kyphotic angle (°) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Preoperative ( | FU ( | Preoperative ( | FU ( | ||
| 1.1 | 13 | 13 | — | 5 | 20.0 (14.7,24.2) | 14.2 (7.8, 16.7) |
| 1.2 | 16 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 20.32 (14.9,25.8) | 8.0 (5.5, 13.0) |
| 2M | 8 | 7 | 3.35 | 3 | 33.8 (19.5, 39.6) | 7.84 (5.7, 15.4) |
| 2 | 19 | 16 | 4.6 | — | 34.8 (17.8, 42.7) | 14.3 (7.3, 16.6) |
FU, final follow‐up; FS, fixed segment; RF, refracture vertebrae.