Literature DB >> 31743019

Ligand Binding Thermodynamic Cycles: Hysteresis, the Locally Weighted Histogram Analysis Method, and the Overlapping States Matrix.

Di Cui1, Bin W Zhang1, Zhiqiang Tan2, Ronald M Levy1.   

Abstract

Free energy perturbation (FEP) simulations have been widely applied to obtain predictions of the relative binding free energy for a series of congeneric ligands binding to the same receptor, which is an essential component for the lead optimization process in computer-aided drug discovery. In the case of several congeneric ligands forming a perturbation map involving a closed thermodynamic cycle, the summation of the estimated free energy change along each edge in the cycle using Bennett acceptance ratio (BAR) usually will deviate from zero due to systematic and random errors, which is the hysteresis of cycle closure. In this work, the advanced reweighting techniques binless weighted histogram analysis method (UWHAM) and locally weighted histogram analysis method (LWHAM) are applied to provide statistical estimators of the free energy change along each edge in order to eliminate the hysteresis effect. As an example, we analyze a closed thermodynamic cycle involving four congeneric ligands which bind to HIV-1 integrase, a promising target which has emerged for antiviral therapy. We demonstrate that, compared with FEP and BAR, more accurate and hysteresis-free estimates of free energy differences can be achieved by using UWHAM to find a single estimate of the density of states based on all of the data in the cycle. Furthermore, by comparison of LWHAM results obtained from the inclusion of different numbers of neighboring states with UWHAM estimation involving all the states, we show how to determine the optimal neighborhood size in the LWHAM analysis to balance the trade-offs between computational cost and accuracy of the free energy prediction. Even with the smallest neighborhood, LWHAM can improve the BAR free energy estimates using the same input data as BAR. We introduce an overlapping states matrix that is constructed by using the global jump formula of LWHAM and plot its heat map. The heat map provides a quantitative measure of the overlap between pairs of alchemical/thermodynamic states. We explain how to identify and improve the FEP calculations along the edges that most likely cause large systematic errors by using the heat map of the overlapping states matrix and by comparing the BAR and UWHAM estimates of the free energy change.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31743019      PMCID: PMC7137390          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00740

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  45 in total

1.  On achieving high accuracy and reliability in the calculation of relative protein-ligand binding affinities.

Authors:  Lingle Wang; B J Berne; Richard A Friesner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity by free energy simulations: assumptions, pitfalls and expectations.

Authors:  Julien Michel; Jonathan W Essex
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  PROPKA3: Consistent Treatment of Internal and Surface Residues in Empirical pKa Predictions.

Authors:  Mats H M Olsson; Chresten R Søndergaard; Michal Rostkowski; Jan H Jensen
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2011-01-06       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Locally weighted histogram analysis and stochastic solution for large-scale multi-state free energy estimation.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Tan; Junchao Xia; Bin W Zhang; Ronald M Levy
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Comparison of efficiency and bias of free energies computed by exponential averaging, the Bennett acceptance ratio, and thermodynamic integration.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; Vijay S Pande
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2005-04-08       Impact factor: 3.488

6.  Can free energy calculations be fast and accurate at the same time? Binding of low-affinity, non-peptide inhibitors to the SH2 domain of the src protein.

Authors:  Christophe Chipot; Xavier Rozanska; Surjit B Dixit
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 3.686

7.  Statistically optimal analysis of samples from multiple equilibrium states.

Authors:  Michael R Shirts; John D Chodera
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2008-09-28       Impact factor: 3.488

8.  Lead optimization mapper: automating free energy calculations for lead optimization.

Authors:  Shuai Liu; Yujie Wu; Teng Lin; Robert Abel; Jonathan P Redmann; Christopher M Summa; Vivian R Jaber; Nathan M Lim; David L Mobley
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2013-09-26       Impact factor: 3.686

9.  Accurate and reliable prediction of relative ligand binding potency in prospective drug discovery by way of a modern free-energy calculation protocol and force field.

Authors:  Lingle Wang; Yujie Wu; Yuqing Deng; Byungchan Kim; Levi Pierce; Goran Krilov; Dmitry Lupyan; Shaughnessy Robinson; Markus K Dahlgren; Jeremy Greenwood; Donna L Romero; Craig Masse; Jennifer L Knight; Thomas Steinbrecher; Thijs Beuming; Wolfgang Damm; Ed Harder; Woody Sherman; Mark Brewer; Ron Wester; Mark Murcko; Leah Frye; Ramy Farid; Teng Lin; David L Mobley; William L Jorgensen; Bruce J Berne; Richard A Friesner; Robert Abel
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field.

Authors:  Kresten Lindorff-Larsen; Stefano Piana; Kim Palmo; Paul Maragakis; John L Klepeis; Ron O Dror; David E Shaw
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-06
View more
  3 in total

1.  Extension of the Variational Free Energy Profile and Multistate Bennett Acceptance Ratio Methods for High-Dimensional Potential of Mean Force Profile Analysis.

Authors:  Timothy J Giese; Şölen Ekesan; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.781

2.  Variational Method for Networkwide Analysis of Relative Ligand Binding Free Energies with Loop Closure and Experimental Constraints.

Authors:  Timothy J Giese; Darrin M York
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 6.006

3.  Structure-based virtual screening workflow to identify antivirals targeting HIV-1 capsid.

Authors:  Qinfang Sun; Avik Biswas; R S K Vijayan; Pierrick Craveur; Stefano Forli; Arthur J Olson; Andres Emanuelli Castaner; Karen A Kirby; Stefan G Sarafianos; Nanjie Deng; Ronald Levy
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.179

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.