| Literature DB >> 31739575 |
Natalia A Luchnikova1,2, Kseniya M Ivanova1,2, Ekaterina V Tarasova1,2, Victoria V Grishko3, Irina B Ivshina1,2.
Abstract
Organic wood extractives-resin acids-significantly contribute to an increase in the toxicity level of pulp and paper industry effluents. Entering open ecosystems, resin acids accumulate and have toxic effects on living organisms, which can lead to the ecological imbalance. Among the most effective methods applied to neutralize these ecotoxicants is enzymatic detoxification using microorganisms. A fundamental interest in the in-depth study of the oxidation mechanisms of resin acids and the search for their key biodegraders is increasing every year. Compounds from this group receive attention because of the need to develop highly effective procedures of resin acid removal from pulp and paper effluents and also the possibility to obtain their derivatives with pronounced pharmacological effects. Over the past fifteen years, this is the first report analyzing the data on distribution, the impacts on living organisms, and the microbial transformation of resin acids. Using the example of dehydroabietic acid-the dominant compound of resin acids in effluents-the review discusses the features of interactions between microorganisms and this pollutant and also highlights the pathways and main products of resin acid bioconversion.Entities:
Keywords: biological activity; biotransformation; diterpenoids; resin acids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31739575 PMCID: PMC6891630 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24224121
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Structures of resin acids (RAs) found in pulp and paper mill (PPM) effluents.
RAs (%) in the galipot of conifers.
| Acid | Scots Pine | Ordinary Spruce | Maritime Pine |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abietic | 7.86 | 13.95 | 16.10 |
| Dehydroabietic | 64.58 | 50.08 | 23.50 |
| Pimaric | 10.86 | 7.57 | 10.80 |
| Isopimaric | 8.26 | 18.83 | 6.90 |
| Unidentified | 8.43 | 9.55 | – |
Solubility and toxicity of RAs.
| RA | Solubility, mg/L | Acute Toxicity (LD50), mg/L | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daphnia | Rainbow Trout | Red Salmon | Silver Salmon | Fathead Minnow | ||
| DHA | 5.11 | 1.28–6.35 | 0.77–1.32 | 0.50–2.10 | 0.75–1.85 | 2.10–3.20 |
| ABA | 2.75 | 0.68 | 0.72–1.53 | 0.20 | 0.40 | 2.38 |
| LPA | 2.54 | 0.50 | 0.61–1.00 | – | – | – |
| NAA | 2.31 | 0.35 | 0.63–0.71 | – | – | 1.30–1.70 |
| PA | 2.17 | 0.26 | 0.74–1.23 | – | 0.32 | – |
| SPA | 1.82 | 0.13 | – | – | 0.36 | – |
| IPA | 1.70 | 0.07 | 0.40–1.00 | 0.70 | 0.20 | – |
RA bioaccumulation in fish organs.
| Study Object | Concentration | Conditions | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fine flounder | |||
| Bile | 30.5–41.9 µg/g, total RA content | Caught near the PPM effluent discharge site | [ |
| Rainbow trout | |||
| Bile | <200 µg/g DHA | After 57 days of exposure to PPM effluents | [ |
| Blood plasma | 155–318 µg/g DHA | After 4 days of exposure to DHA (1.2 mg/L) in water | [ |
| Liver | 98–103 µg/g DHA | After 4 days of exposure to DHA (1.2 mg/L) | |
| 202–351 µg/g, total RA content | After 2 days of exposure to a mixture of RAs (1.4 mg/L) in water | ||
| Kidney | 47–114 µg/g DHA | After 4 days of exposure to DHA (1.2 mg/L) | |
| 72–115 µg/g, total RA content | After 2 days of exposure to a mixture of RAs (1.4 mg/L) in water | ||
Microorganisms capable of RA biodegradation.
| Strain | Substrate | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Gram-negative | ||
| DHA | [ | |
| DHA | [ | |
| DHA, ABA, IPA | [ | |
| DHA | [ | |
| IPA | [ | |
| DHA, ABA, PA | [ | |
| DHA, ABA | [ | |
| Mixture of RAs | [ | |
| Mixture of RAs | [ | |
| IPA | [ | |
| “Pseudomonas multiresinivorans” * | IPA | [ |
| IPA | [ | |
| ABA | [ | |
| DHA | [ | |
| IPA | [ | |
| IPA | [ | |
| DHA | [ | |
| DHA | [ | |
| Mixture of RAs | [ | |
| DHA | [ | |
| DHA | [ | |
| Mixture of RAs | [ | |
| DHA | [ | |
| Gram-positive | ||
|
| DHA | [ |
| DHA | [ | |
| DHA | [ | |
| DHA | [ | |
| DHA | [ | |
| IPA | [ | |
| DHA | [ | |
| DHA | [ | |
| DHA | [ | |
Note: * The former name of the bacterial taxon is in upright font and in quotation marks. The current name of the taxon is given in parenthesis.
Scheme 1The proposed pathway for bacterial DHA degradation.
Scheme 2Bacterial degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) on the example of naphthalene.
Scheme 3The proposed convergent pathway for abietane-type RA biodegradation.
Scheme 4Proposed anaerobic pathways for ABA, DHA, and PA degradation.
Transformation products of abietane-type RAs using fungi, and their bioactivities.
| Compound | Biological Activity | Biocatalyst | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1β-hydroxy-DHA ( | Antimicrobial, inhibitory activity against α-glucosidase | [ | |
| 2α-hydroxy-DHA ( | Antimicrobial, selective antitumor |
| [ |
| 7β-hydroxy-DHA ( | Antimicrobial, fungicidal, antitumor | [ | |
| 15-hydroxy-DHA ( | Anti-inflammatory. An intermediate of antiviral and antitumor agent synthesis | [ | |
| 16-hydroxy-DHA ( | Antimicrobial | [ |
Figure 2Structures of RA transformation products using fungi.
Scheme 5DHA biotransformation using R. erythropolis IEGM 267.
Figure 3Structures of RA biotransformation products using bacteria and purified bacterial enzymatic complexes.