Literature DB >> 31728873

Nanostim leadless pacemaker retrieval and simultaneous micra leadless pacemaker replacement: a single-center experience.

Roshini S Asirvatham1, Vaibhav R Vaidya1, Trena M Thome1, Paul A Friedman1, Yong-Mei Cha2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The leadless pacemaker (LP) is a promising new technology in pacing therapy that avoids a generator pocket and transvenous lead-related complications. However, extraction experience with simultaneous re-implant of a leadless device remains limited. We sought to study the outcomes of Nanostim LP retrieval and simultaneous reimplantation of Micra LP.
METHODS: Patients undergoing retrieval of the Nanostim LP and receiving a Micra LP implant between 2016 and 2018 at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) were studied. The procedural and outcome data were collected from the electronic medical record.
RESULTS: Nine patients underwent attempted Nanostim LP retrieval and 6 of these simultaneously received a Micra LP reimplant. All retrievals were considered chronic due to implant durations of > 1 year. Extraction procedures were completed with a success rate of 89% and simultaneous reimplantations were performed successfully in all cases with no major complications. Newly implanted Micra LP device function was normal at follow-up. Factors such as duration of device implant and device positioning appeared to impact ease of extraction.
CONCLUSIONS: Retrieval of the Nanostim LP system and simultaneous replacement with an alternate Micra leadless device appears to be a feasible approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Complication; Implant; Leadless pacemaker; Retrieval

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31728873     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-019-00647-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  18 in total

Review 1.  Pacemaker lead complications: when is extraction appropriate and what can we learn from published data?

Authors:  F A Bracke; A Meijer; L M van Gelder
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Long-term complication rates in ventricular, single lead VDD, and dual chamber pacing.

Authors:  Uwe K H Wiegand; Frank Bode; Hendrik Bonnemeier; Frank Eberhard; Monika Schlei; Werner Peters
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.976

Review 3.  Leadless Cardiac Pacemakers: Back to the Future.

Authors:  Marc A Miller; Petr Neuzil; Srinivas R Dukkipati; Vivek Y Reddy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  A Leadless Intracardiac Transcatheter Pacing System.

Authors:  Dwight Reynolds; Gabor Z Duray; Razali Omar; Kyoko Soejima; Petr Neuzil; Shu Zhang; Calambur Narasimhan; Clemens Steinwender; Josep Brugada; Michael Lloyd; Paul R Roberts; Venkata Sagi; John Hummel; Maria Grazia Bongiorni; Reinoud E Knops; Christopher R Ellis; Charles C Gornick; Matthew A Bernabei; Verla Laager; Kurt Stromberg; Eric R Williams; J Harrison Hudnall; Philippe Ritter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Leadless cardiac pacemakers: present and the future.

Authors:  Derek S Chew; Vikas Kuriachan
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Leadless pacemaker extraction from a single-center perspective.

Authors:  Elkin González Villegas; Omar Al Razzo; Jorge Silvestre García; José Mesa García
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 1.976

7.  Retrieval of the Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker: A Multicenter Experience.

Authors:  Vivek Y Reddy; Marc A Miller; Reinoud E Knops; Petr Neuzil; Pascal Defaye; Werner Jung; Rahul Doshi; Mark Castellani; Adam Strickberger; R Hardwin Mead; Harish Doppalapudi; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy; Matthew Bennett; Johannes Sperzel
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-12

8.  Venous obstruction after pacemaker implantation.

Authors:  Petri Korkeila; Kai Nyman; Antti Ylitalo; Juhani Koistinen; Pasi Karjalainen; Juha Lund; K E Juhani Airaksinen
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  Risk factors related to infections of implanted pacemakers and cardioverter-defibrillators: results of a large prospective study.

Authors:  Didier Klug; Mamadou Balde; Dominique Pavin; Françoise Hidden-Lucet; Jacques Clementy; Nicolas Sadoul; Jean Luc Rey; Gilles Lande; Arnaud Lazarus; Jacques Victor; Claude Barnay; Bruno Grandbastien; Salem Kacet
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-08-27       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Successful replacement of the longest worldwide in situ Nanostim leadless cardiac pacemaker for a Micra Transcatheter Pacing System.

Authors:  Niek E G Beurskens; Fleur V Y Tjong; Anne-Floor B E Quast; Reinoud E Knops
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 1.900

View more
  1 in total

1.  Tricuspid Valve Replacement in a Patient with a Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker: Current Guidelines and Recommendations for Perioperative Management.

Authors:  River Hames; J W Awori Hayanga; Diane Schmidt-Krings; Timothy Goldhardt; John Bozek; Donald Siddoway; Stanley Schmidt; John Lobban; Heather K Hayanga
Journal:  Case Rep Anesthesiol       Date:  2021-07-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.