BACKGROUND: Although studies have described factors associated with failed magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), little is known about what factors influence usable elastography data. PURPOSE: To identify factors that have a negative impact on percent measurable liver volume (pMLV), defined as the proportion of usable liver elastography data relative to the volume of imaged liver in patients undergoing MRE. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: A total of 264 patients (n = 132 males, n = 132 females; mean age = 57 years) with suspected or known chronic liver disease underwent MRE paired with a liver protocol MRI. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: MRE was performed on a single 1.5 T scanner using a two-dimensional gradient-recalled echo phase-contrast sequence with a passive acoustic driver overlying the right hemiliver. ASSESSMENT: Stiffness maps (usable data at 95% confidence) and liver contours on magnitude images of the MRE acquisition were manually traced and used to assess mean stiffness and pMLV. Hepatic fat fraction and R2 * values were also calculated. The distance from the acoustic wave generator on the skin surface to the liver edge was measured. Two radiologists performed the MR analyses with 50 overlapping cases for inter-reader analysis. STATISTICAL TESTS: Linear regression was performed to identify factors significantly associated with pMLV. Intraclass correlation was performed for inter-reader reliability. RESULTS: pMLV was 31% ± 20% (range 0%-86%). Complete MRE failure (i.e. pMLV = 0%) occurred in 10 patients (4%). Multivariate linear regression identified higher hepatic fat fraction, R2 *, BMI, and driver-to-liver surface distance; male sex; and lower mean liver stiffness was significantly independently associated with lower pMLV. Intraclass correlation for pMLV was 0.96, suggestive of excellent reliability. DATA CONCLUSION: Higher fat fraction, R2 *, BMI, driver-to-liver surface distance, male sex, and lower mean liver stiffness were associated with lower pMLV. Optimization of image acquisition parameters and driver placement may improve MRE quality, and pMLV likely serves as a diagnostic utility quality control metric. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
BACKGROUND: Although studies have described factors associated with failed magnetic resonance elastography (MRE), little is known about what factors influence usable elastography data. PURPOSE: To identify factors that have a negative impact on percent measurable liver volume (pMLV), defined as the proportion of usable liver elastography data relative to the volume of imaged liver in patients undergoing MRE. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: A total of 264 patients (n = 132 males, n = 132 females; mean age = 57 years) with suspected or known chronic liver disease underwent MRE paired with a liver protocol MRI. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: MRE was performed on a single 1.5 T scanner using a two-dimensional gradient-recalled echo phase-contrast sequence with a passive acoustic driver overlying the right hemiliver. ASSESSMENT: Stiffness maps (usable data at 95% confidence) and liver contours on magnitude images of the MRE acquisition were manually traced and used to assess mean stiffness and pMLV. Hepatic fat fraction and R2 * values were also calculated. The distance from the acoustic wave generator on the skin surface to the liver edge was measured. Two radiologists performed the MR analyses with 50 overlapping cases for inter-reader analysis. STATISTICAL TESTS: Linear regression was performed to identify factors significantly associated with pMLV. Intraclass correlation was performed for inter-reader reliability. RESULTS: pMLV was 31% ± 20% (range 0%-86%). Complete MRE failure (i.e. pMLV = 0%) occurred in 10 patients (4%). Multivariate linear regression identified higher hepatic fat fraction, R2 *, BMI, and driver-to-liver surface distance; male sex; and lower mean liver stiffness was significantly independently associated with lower pMLV. Intraclass correlation for pMLV was 0.96, suggestive of excellent reliability. DATA CONCLUSION: Higher fat fraction, R2 *, BMI, driver-to-liver surface distance, male sex, and lower mean liver stiffness were associated with lower pMLV. Optimization of image acquisition parameters and driver placement may improve MRE quality, and pMLV likely serves as a diagnostic utility quality control metric. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.
Authors: Mathilde Wagner; Idoia Corcuera-Solano; Grace Lo; Steven Esses; Joseph Liao; Cecilia Besa; Nelson Chen; Ginu Abraham; Maggie Fung; James S Babb; Richard L Ehman; Bachir Taouli Journal: Radiology Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Jin Wang; Kevin J Glaser; Tianhui Zhang; Qungang Shan; Bingjun He; Jun Chen; Meng Yin; Bogdan Dzyubak; Jennifer L Kugel; Scott A Kruse; Roger C Grimm; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Richard L Ehman Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2017-08-11 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Tyler J Fraum; Daniel R Ludwig; Scott Kilian; William A Curtis; Thomas K Pilgram; Claude B Sirlin; Kathryn J Fowler Journal: Acad Radiol Date: 2017-12-02 Impact factor: 3.173
Authors: Siddharth Singh; Sudhakar K Venkatesh; Zhen Wang; Frank H Miller; Utaroh Motosugi; Russell N Low; Tarek Hassanein; Patrick Asbach; Edmund M Godfrey; Meng Yin; Jun Chen; Andrew P Keaveny; Mellena Bridges; Anneloes Bohte; Mohammad Hassan Murad; David J Lomas; Jayant A Talwalkar; Richard L Ehman Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Andrew T Trout; Rachel M Sheridan; Suraj D Serai; Stavra A Xanthakos; Weizhe Su; Bin Zhang; Daniel B Wallihan Journal: Radiology Date: 2018-02-22 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Ely R Felker; Kang-Sun Choi; Kyung Sung; Holden H Wu; Steven S Raman; Bradley D Bolster; Stephan Kannengiesser; Kari Sorge; David S K Lu Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2018-07-11 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Tim G St Pierre; Michael J House; Sander J Bangma; Wenjie Pang; Andrew Bathgate; Eng K Gan; Oyekoya T Ayonrinde; Prithi S Bhathal; Andrew Clouston; John K Olynyk; Leon A Adams Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-08-08 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sevgi Gokce Kafali; Tess Armstrong; Shu-Fu Shih; Grace J Kim; Joseph L Holtrop; Robert S Venick; Shahnaz Ghahremani; Bradley D Bolster; Claudia M Hillenbrand; Kara L Calkins; Holden H Wu Journal: Pediatr Radiol Date: 2022-04-02