Literature DB >> 27715486

Spin-echo Echo-planar Imaging MR Elastography versus Gradient-echo MR Elastography for Assessment of Liver Stiffness in Children and Young Adults Suspected of Having Liver Disease.

Suraj D Serai1, Jonathan R Dillman1, Andrew T Trout1.   

Abstract

Purpose To compare two-dimensional (2D) gradient-recalled echo (GRE) and 2D spin-echo (SE) echo-planar imaging (EPI) magnetic resonance (MR) elastography for measurement of hepatic stiffness in pediatric and young adult patients suspected of having liver disease. Materials and Methods In this institutional review board-approved, HIPAA-compliant study, 58 patients underwent both 2D GRE and 2D SE-EPI MR elastography at 1.5 T during separate breath holds. Liver stiffness (mean of means; in kilopascals) was measured by five blinded reviewers. Pooled mean liver stiffness and region-of-interest (ROI) size were compared by using paired t tests. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess agreement between techniques. Respiratory motion artifacts were compared across sequences by using the Fisher exact test. Results Mean patient age was 14.7 years ± 5.2 (standard deviation; age range, 0.7-20.5 years), and 55.2% (32 of 58) of patients were male. Mean liver stiffness was 2.92 kPa ± 1.29 measured at GRE MR elastography and 2.76 kPa ± 1.39 at SE-EPI MR elastography (n = 290; P = .15). Mean ROI sizes were 8495 mm2 ± 4482 for 2D GRE MR elastography and 15 176 mm2 ± 7609 for 2D SE-EPI MR elastography (n = 290; P < .001). Agreement was excellent for measured stiffness between five reviewers for both 2D GRE (ICC, 0.97; 95% confidence interval: 0.95, 0.98) and 2D SE-EPI (ICC, 0.98; 95% confidence interval: 0.96, 0.99). Mean ICC (n = 5) for agreement between 2D GRE and 2D SE-EPI MR elastography was 0.93 (range, 0.91-0.95). Moderate or severe breathing artifacts were observed on 27.5% (16 of 58) of 2D GRE images versus 0% 2D SE-EPI images (P < .001). Conclusion There is excellent agreement on measured hepatic stiffness between 2D GRE and 2D SE-EPI MR elastography across multiple reviewers. SE-EPI MR elastography allowed for stiffness measurement across larger areas of the liver and can be performed in a single breath hold. © RSNA, 2016.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27715486     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016160589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  23 in total

1.  Breath-hold MR-HIFU hyperthermia: phantom and in vivo feasibility.

Authors:  Chenchen Bing; Bingbing Cheng; Robert M Staruch; Joris Nofiele; Michelle Wodzak Staruch; Debra Szczepanski; Alan Farrow-Gillespie; Adeline Yang; Theodore W Laetsch; Rajiv Chopra
Journal:  Int J Hyperthermia       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 3.914

Review 2.  MR elastography of liver: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Ilkay S Idilman; Jiahui Li; Meng Yin; Sudhakar K Venkatesh
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-07-23

Review 3.  Comparison of gradient-recalled echo and spin-echo echo-planar imaging MR elastography in staging liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong Seek Kim; Yu Na Jang; Ji Soo Song
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-11-21       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Feasibility and agreement of stiffness measurements using gradient-echo and spin-echo MR elastography sequences in unselected patients undergoing liver MRI.

Authors:  Guilherme Moura Cunha; Kevin J Glaser; Anke Bergman; Rodrigo P Luz; Eduardo H de Figueiredo; Flavia Paiva Proença Lobo Lopes
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  MR elastography: high rate of technical success in pediatric and young adult patients.

Authors:  Madalsa Joshi; Jonathan R Dillman; Alexander J Towbin; Suraj D Serai; Andrew T Trout
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-04-03

Review 6.  Advances in Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver.

Authors:  Jiahui Li; Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh; Meng Yin
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2020-06-06       Impact factor: 2.266

7.  Technical success rates and reliability of spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) MR elastography in patients with chronic liver disease or liver cirrhosis.

Authors:  Sang Lim Choi; Eun Sun Lee; Ara Ko; Hyun Jeong Park; Sung Bin Park; Byung Ihn Choi; Young Youn Cho; Stephan Kannengiesser
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Magnetic resonance elastography SE-EPI vs GRE sequences at 3T in a pediatric population with liver disease.

Authors:  Juan S Calle-Toro; Suraj D Serai; Erum A Hartung; David J Goldberg; Bradley D Bolster; Kassa Darge; Sudha A Anupindi
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2019-03

Review 9.  Putting it all together: established and emerging MRI techniques for detecting and measuring liver fibrosis.

Authors:  Suraj D Serai; Andrew T Trout; Alexander Miethke; Eric Diaz; Stavra A Xanthakos; Jonathan R Dillman
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2018-08-04

Review 10.  Magnetic Resonance Elastography of Liver: Current Update.

Authors:  Safa Hoodeshenas; Meng Yin; Sudhakar Kundapur Venkatesh
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.