Literature DB >> 31727325

The potential of machine learning to predict postoperative pancreatic fistula based on preoperative, non-contrast-enhanced CT: A proof-of-principle study.

Patryk Kambakamba1, Manoj Mannil2, Paola E Herrera2, Philip C Müller3, Christoph Kuemmerli3, Michael Linecker3, Jochen von Spiczak2, Martin W Hüllner4, Dimitri A Raptis3, Henrik Petrowsky3, Pierre-Alain Clavien3, Hatem Alkadhi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula remains an unsolved challenge after pancreatoduodenectomy. Important in this regard is the presence of a soft pancreatic texture which is a major risk factor. Advances in machine learning and texture analysis of medical images allow identification of features of parenchyma that are invisible to the human eye. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of machine learning to predict postoperative pancreatic fistula based on preoperative, non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
METHODS: We screened a prospectively assessed database including all patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy at a tertiary center from 2008 until 2018 for patients based on the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula. In total, 110 patients were included, consisting of 55 patients who developed a postoperative pancreatic fistula and 55 without postoperative pancreatic fistula. For machine learning-based texture analysis preoperative, non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography axial images were used. Machine learning results were tested using 10-fold cross validation. Previously validated clinical fistula risk scores (original and alternative fistula risk scores) served as reference tests.
RESULTS: Both the original and the alternative fistula risk scores showed good discrimination between patients without and with postoperative pancreatic fistula (area under the curve 0.76 and 0.72, respectively). Machine learning-based texture analysis showed potential to detect histologic fibrosis (area under the curve 0.84, sensitivity 75%; specificity 92%), histologic lipomatosis (area under the curve 0.82, sensitivity 78%; specificity 89%), and intraoperative pancreatic hardness (area under the curve 0.70, sensitivity 78%; specificity 74%). The features of the machine learning-based texture analysis were most accurate in predicting the occurrence of postoperative pancreatic fistula (area under the curve 0.95, sensitivity of 96%; specificity 98%) after pancreatoduodenectomy.
CONCLUSION: This proof-of-principle study suggests the ability of machine learning in recognizing important features of pancreatic texture associated with an increased risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula based on preoperative computed tomography.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31727325     DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.09.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  10 in total

Review 1.  Machine learning in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  Takashi Sakamoto; Tadahiro Goto; Michimasa Fujiogi; Alan Kawarai Lefor
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 2.  The role of artificial intelligence in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  D Schlanger; F Graur; C Popa; E Moiș; N Al Hajjar
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-03-02

3.  Predicting Survival for Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy of Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: Radiomics Analysis of Pretreatment Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Peng Liu; Haitao Zhu; Haibin Zhu; Xiaoyan Zhang; Aiwei Feng; Xu Zhu; Yingshi Sun
Journal:  J Transl Int Med       Date:  2022-04-02

4.  Prediction of treatment response to transarterial radioembolization of liver metastases: Radiomics analysis of pre-treatment cone-beam CT: A proof of concept study.

Authors:  Adrian Kobe; Juliana Zgraggen; Florian Messmer; Gilbert Puippe; Thomas Sartoretti; Hatem Alkadhi; Thomas Pfammatter; Manoj Mannil
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2021-08-30

Review 5.  Recent advances in artificial intelligence for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Hiromitsu Hayashi; Norio Uemura; Kazuki Matsumura; Liu Zhao; Hiroki Sato; Yuta Shiraishi; Yo-Ichi Yamashita; Hideo Baba
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  External validation of risk prediction platforms for pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy using nomograms and artificial intelligence.

Authors:  So Jeong Yoon; Wooil Kwon; Ok Joo Lee; Ji Hye Jung; Yong Chan Shin; Chang-Sup Lim; Hongbeom Kim; Jin-Young Jang; Sang Hyun Shin; Jin Seok Heo; In Woong Han
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 1.859

7.  Research trends of artificial intelligence in pancreatic cancer: a bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Hua Yin; Feixiong Zhang; Xiaoli Yang; Xiangkun Meng; Yu Miao; Muhammad Saad Noor Hussain; Li Yang; Zhaoshen Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-02       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 8.  Application of artificial intelligence to pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Xi Chen; Ruibiao Fu; Qian Shao; Yan Chen; Qinghuang Ye; Sheng Li; Xiongxiong He; Jinhui Zhu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.738

9.  Prediction of clinically relevant Pancreatico-enteric Anastomotic Fistulas after Pancreatoduodenectomy using deep learning of Preoperative Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Wei Mu; Chang Liu; Feng Gao; Yafei Qi; Hong Lu; Zaiyi Liu; Xianyi Zhang; Xiaoli Cai; Ruo Yun Ji; Yang Hou; Jie Tian; Yu Shi
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 11.556

10.  Risk prediction platform for pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy using artificial intelligence.

Authors:  In Woong Han; Kyeongwon Cho; Youngju Ryu; Sang Hyun Shin; Jin Seok Heo; Dong Wook Choi; Myung Jin Chung; Oh Chul Kwon; Baek Hwan Cho
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.