Literature DB >> 35237939

The role of artificial intelligence in pancreatic surgery: a systematic review.

D Schlanger1,2, F Graur3,4, C Popa1,2, E Moiș1,2, N Al Hajjar1,2.   

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML), is being slowly incorporated in medical practice, to provide a more precise and personalized approach. Pancreatic surgery is an evolving field, which offers the only curative option for patients with pancreatic cancer. Increasing amounts of data are available in medicine: AI and ML can help incorporate large amounts of information in clinical practice. We conducted a systematic review, based on PRISMA criteria, of studies that explored the use of AI or ML algorithms in pancreatic surgery. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review on this topic. Twenty-five eligible studies were included in this review; 12 studies with implications in the preoperative diagnosis, while 13 studies had implications in patient evolution. Preoperative diagnosis, such as predicting the malignancy of IPMNs, differential diagnosis between pancreatic cystic lesions, classification of different pancreatic tumours, and establishment of the correct management for each of these lesions, can be facilitated through different AI or ML algorithms. Postoperative evolution can also be predicted, and some studies reported prediction models for complications, including postoperative pancreatic fistula, while other studies have analysed the implications for prognosis evaluation (from predicting a textbook outcome, the risk of metastasis or relapse, or the mortality rate and survival). One study discussed the possibility of predicting an intraoperative complication-massive intraoperative bleeding. Artificial intelligence and machine learning models have promising applications in pancreatic surgery, in the preoperative period (high-accuracy diagnosis) and postoperative setting (prognosis evaluation and complication prediction), and the intraoperative applications have been less explored.
© 2022. Italian Society of Surgery (SIC).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Pancreatic surgery; Precision medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35237939     DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01255-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Updates Surg        ISSN: 2038-131X


  39 in total

Review 1.  Artificial intelligence in medicine.

Authors:  A N Ramesh; C Kambhampati; J R T Monson; P J Drew
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 2.  Pancreatic cancer treatment: better, but a long way to go.

Authors:  Robert J Torphy; Yuki Fujiwara; Richard D Schulick
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2020-05-30       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Implementation of artificial intelligence in medicine: Status analysis and development suggestions.

Authors:  Yifan Xiang; Lanqin Zhao; Zhenzhen Liu; Xiaohang Wu; Jingjing Chen; Erping Long; Duoru Lin; Yi Zhu; Chuan Chen; Zhuoling Lin; Haotian Lin
Journal:  Artif Intell Med       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 5.326

Review 4.  The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Surgery.

Authors:  Daniel A Hashimoto; Thomas M Ward; Ozanan R Meireles
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2020-06-30

5.  Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement.

Authors:  Matthew J Page; Joanne E McKenzie; Patrick M Bossuyt; Isabelle Boutron; Tammy C Hoffmann; Cynthia D Mulrow; Larissa Shamseer; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; David Moher
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 6.  Application of artificial intelligence in surgery.

Authors:  Xiao-Yun Zhou; Yao Guo; Mali Shen; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.592

Review 7.  Recent advances in pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Filip Bednar; Diane M Simeone
Journal:  Curr Opin Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.287

Review 8.  Artificial Intelligence in Surgery: Promises and Perils.

Authors:  Daniel A Hashimoto; Guy Rosman; Daniela Rus; Ozanan R Meireles
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

Authors:  David Moher; Alessandro Liberati; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 10.  Pancreatic cancer: A review of clinical diagnosis, epidemiology, treatment and outcomes.

Authors:  Andrew McGuigan; Paul Kelly; Richard C Turkington; Claire Jones; Helen G Coleman; R Stephen McCain
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  2 in total

1.  Three-dimensional visualization and virtual reality simulation role in hepatic surgery: Further research warranted.

Authors:  Faiza Ahmed; Vinay Jahagirdar; Sravya Gudapati; Mohamad Mouchli
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2022-07-27

2.  Mapping intellectual structures and research hotspots in the application of artificial intelligence in cancer: A bibliometric analysis.

Authors:  Peng-Fei Lyu; Yu Wang; Qing-Xiang Meng; Ping-Ming Fan; Ke Ma; Sha Xiao; Xun-Chen Cao; Guang-Xun Lin; Si-Yuan Dong
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-22       Impact factor: 5.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.