| Literature DB >> 31719968 |
Ayden Saffari1,2, Matt Arno3,4, Eric Nasser4, Angelica Ronald2, Chloe C Y Wong5, Leonard C Schalkwyk6, Jonathan Mill7, Frank Dudbridge1,8, Emma L Meaburn2.
Abstract
Background: A gap exists in our mechanistic understanding of how genetic and environmental risk factors converge at the molecular level to result in the emergence of autism symptoms. We compared blood-based gene expression signatures in identical twins concordant and discordant for autism spectrum condition (ASC) to differentiate genetic and environmentally driven transcription differences, and establish convergent evidence for biological mechanisms involved in ASC.Entities:
Keywords: Autism spectrum disorder; DNA methylation; Discordance; Epigenomics; Gene expression; Immune; MZ twins; RNA-seq; Transcriptomics
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31719968 PMCID: PMC6839145 DOI: 10.1186/s13229-019-0285-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Autism Impact factor: 7.509
Fig. 1Study group sample characteristics (N = 39)
Fig. 2Heatmap showing individuals clustered using correlation of genome-wide expression values between samples as distance (also shown as dendrograms). High correlation r values of 0.99 and above are indicated by the dark coloured squares along the diagonal. Twin pairs are found to have an average correlation of 0.98, compared to 0.96 for unrelated subjects. cASC concordant ASC, dASC discordant ASC, cltC concordant low total CAST (control)
Discordant group differentially expressed genes at FDR < 20%. For each gene, the estimated fold change, average expression (in log counts per million), p value and FDR adjusted p values from edgeR are given. The final column indicates if the gene showed a consistent direction of differential expression across all twin pairs and the arrow which direction this was in (increased or decreased expression in ASC affected compared to unaffected co-twin)
| ensembl gene id | hgnc symbol | chr | logFC | logCPM | FDR | cons. dir | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENSG00000211892 | IGHG4 | 14 | 2.1483 | 1.9484 | 2.11E-08 | 3.76E-04 | |
| ENSG00000126860 | EVI2A | 17 | − 0.6581 | 5.1208 | 2.88E-06 | 1.94E-02 | ↓ |
| ENSG00000207445 | SNORD15B | 11 | − 0.8524 | 3.0638 | 3.28E-06 | 1.94E-02 | ↓ |
| ENSG00000150681 | RGS18 | 1 | − 0.5252 | 6.9877 | 2.49E-05 | 1.11E-01 | ↓ |
| ENSG00000139679 | LPAR6 | 13 | − 0.6090 | 4.7990 | 3.46E-05 | 1.23E-01 | ↓ |
| ENSG00000163682 | RPL9 | 4 | − 0.6645 | 6.8391 | 5.01E-05 | 1.48E-01 | |
| ENSG00000163736 | PPBP | 4 | − 0.4830 | 7.4291 | 6.32E-05 | 1.60E-01 | ↓ |
| ENSG00000035499 | DEPDC1B | 5 | − 1.3113 | 0.5493 | 1.00E-04 | 1.86E-01 | ↓ |
| ENSG00000187534 | PRR13P5 | 19 | 1.5220 | 0.4947 | 1.14E-04 | 1.86E-01 | |
| ENSG00000198339 | HIST1H4I | 6 | − 0.6694 | 3.7498 | 1.15E-04 | 1.86E-01 | ↓ |
| ENSG00000156482 | RPL30 | 8 | − 0.5020 | 8.3615 | 1.18E-04 | 1.86E-01 | ↓ |
| ENSG00000229117 | RPL41 | 12 | − 0.5682 | 6.9233 | 1.28E-04 | 1.86E-01 | ↓ |
| ENSG00000166710 | B2M | 15 | − 0.5655 | 11.3125 | 1.44E-04 | 1.86E-01 | ↓ |
| ENSG00000138180 | CEP55 | 10 | − 1.4366 | 0.2429 | 1.48E-04 | 1.86E-01 | |
| ENSG00000184825 | HIST1H2AH | 6 | − 0.7410 | 3.6227 | 1.61E-04 | 1.86E-01 | |
| ENSG00000145425 | RPS3A | 4 | − 0.7436 | 6.8823 | 1.67E-04 | 1.86E-01 |
Fig. 3a, b Volcano plots showing relationship between significance and logFC for a discordant and b case control analyses. DE genes passing FDR < 0.1 are indicated by the coloured points and labelled
Case-control differentially expressed genes at FDR < 20%
| Ensembl gene id | HGNC symbol | Chr | logFC | logCPM | FDR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENSG00000211892 | IGHG4 | 14 | 2.0362 | 1.0333 | 8.06E-06 | 9.73E-02 |
| ENSG00000187534 | PRR13P5 | 19 | 1.5312 | 0.3223 | 1.27E-05 | 9.73E-02 |
| ENSG00000035499 | DEPDC1B | 5 | − 1.3208 | 0.4996 | 1.65E-05 | 9.73E-02 |
| ENSG00000186446 | ZNF501 | 3 | − 0.8795 | 2.1953 | 2.19E-05 | 9.73E-02 |
| ENSG00000224442 | 2 | 0.6384 | 2.9985 | 4.53E-05 | 1.61E-01 | |
| ENSG00000232184 | 1 | 1.0939 | 1.0182 | 5.76E-05 | 1.71E-01 |