| Literature DB >> 31719542 |
Patrick Campbell1, Jamie M Ellingford1,2, Neil R A Parry3, Tracy Fletcher1, Simon C Ramsden1, Theodora Gale1, Georgina Hall1, Katherine Smith4, Dalia Kasperaviciute4, Ellen Thomas4, I Chris Lloyd1,5, Sofia Douzgou1,2, Jill Clayton-Smith1,2, Susmito Biswas3, Jane L Ashworth3, Graeme C M Black6,7, Panagiotis I Sergouniotis8,9,10.
Abstract
Individuals who have ocular features of albinism and skin pigmentation in keeping with their familial background present a considerable diagnostic challenge. Timely diagnosis through genomic testing can help avert diagnostic odysseys and facilitates accurate genetic counselling and tailored specialist management. Here, we report the clinical and gene panel testing findings in 12 children with presumed ocular albinism. A definitive molecular diagnosis was made in 8/12 probands (67%) and a possible molecular diagnosis was identified in a further 3/12 probands (25%). TYR was the most commonly mutated gene in this cohort (75% of patients, 9/12). A disease-causing TYR haplotype comprised of two common, functional polymorphisms, TYR c.[575 C > A;1205 G > A] p.[(Ser192Tyr);(Arg402Gln)], was found to be particularly prevalent. One participant had GPR143-associated X-linked ocular albinism and another proband had biallelic variants in SLC38A8, a glutamine transporter gene associated with foveal hypoplasia and optic nerve misrouting without pigmentation defects. Intriguingly, 2/12 individuals had a single, rare, likely pathogenic variant in each of TYR and OCA2 - a significant enrichment compared to a control cohort of 4046 individuals from the 100,000 genomes project pilot dataset. Overall, our findings highlight that panel-based genetic testing is a clinically useful test with a high diagnostic yield in children with partial/ocular albinism.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31719542 PMCID: PMC6851142 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-51768-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Clinical findings in 12 children with ocular features of albinism and no obvious skin pigmentation abnormalities.
| proband ID | age at genetic testing (years) | sex | iris transillumination | foveal hypoplasia | fundal hypopigmentation | age at VEP testing (years) | VEP crossed asymmetry (pattern & flash VEP score) | relevant family history |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | <1 | M | no | yes | yes | <1 | possible (P-1, F1) | none reported |
| 2 | 14 | F | no | yes | yes | <1; 2; 14 | probable (P-1, F2); no (P-1, F0); yes (P3, F3) | none reported |
| 3 | 1 | M | yes | yes | yes | not tested | not tested | none reported |
| 4 | 3 | M | yes | yes | yes | <1 | yes (P3, F3) | mother with iris transillumination & foveal hypoplasia |
| 5 | 6 | M | yes | yes | yes | 5 | yes (P3, F3) | identical twin affected |
| 6 | 1 | M | yes | yes | yes | <1 | yes (P3, F3) | none reported |
| 7 | 8 | M | yes | yes | yes | <1 | probable (P2, F1) | none reported |
| 8 | 11 | F | yes | yes | yes | not tested | not tested | brother affected |
| 9 | 1 | F | yes | yes | yes | 1 | no (P0, F0) | none reported |
| 10 | 7 | F | no | yes | yes | 3; 6 | probable (P2, F0); probable (P0, F2) | none reported |
| 11 | 7 | M | no | yes | no | 1; 4 | possible (P1, F0); no (P0, F0) | half-brother of paternal grandmother with nystagmus |
| 12 | 5 | M | no | no | no | 2 | yes (P1, F3) | parental consanguinity |
VEP, visual evoked potential; M, male; F, female. All study participants had skin pigmentation in keeping with their familial background. Other clinical features included prominent posterior embryotoxa in proband 2, easy bruising in proband 9 and mild developmental delay in proband 12.
Pattern (P) and flash (F) VEP scores are shown. A score of [−1] corresponds to inadequate signal, either due to poor cooperation or simply because spatial vision was too poor. A score of [0] suggests no crossed asymmetry (i.e. the right-left difference plots for right and left eyes were indistinguishable). A score of [1] denotes possible crossed asymmetry (i.e. whilst most components are not asymmetrical, one or two are). A score of [2] suggests probable crossed asymmetry (i.e. crossed asymmetry is partial or the polarity of the components is reversed but the phase is shifted). A score of [3] denotes definite crossed asymmetry (i.e. while right-left interhemispheric difference plots may be of differing amplitude, their waveforms are more or less mirror images of each other.
Genetic findings in 12 children with ocular features of albinism and no obvious skin pigmentation abnormalities.
| proband ID | gene panel used for testing (number of genes evaluated) | variant 1 | variant 2 | variant 3 | samples available for segregation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ocular/oculocutanous albinism (18) | — | — | mother | |
| 2 | nystagmus & foveal hypoplasia (26) | SLC38A8 exon 2 to 5 deletion | — | none | |
| 3 | ocular/oculocutanous albinism (18) | none | |||
| 4 | optic nerve disorders (40) | mother & father | |||
| 5 | ocular/oculocutanous albinism (18) | mother & father | |||
| 6 | nystagmus & foveal hypoplasia (26) | — | mother & father | ||
| 7 | nystagmus & foveal hypoplasia (26) | — | no | ||
| 8 | ocular/oculocutanous albinism (18) | mother, father & affected brother | |||
| 9 | clinical exome | no | |||
| 10 | nystagmus & foveal hypoplasia (26) | — | mother | ||
| 11 | nystagmus & foveal hypoplasia (26) | — | mother | ||
| 12 | ocular/oculocutanous albinism (18) | no pathogenic variant identified | — | — | no |
The genes and transcripts included in each gene panel can be found in Supplementary Table 1. The results of segregation are discussed in the text and family trees are provided in the Supplementary File.
Analysis of disease-associated variants identified in children with ocular features of albinism.
| gene | genotype | protein | probands affected | report describing the variant in association with albinism | gnomAD total frequency % (allele count) | polyphen-2 HumVar score | CADD score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| c.659-1 G > A | not applicable | 1 | Han | not detected (0/183,366) | not applicable | 26.5 |
|
| c.1217 C > T | p.(Pro406Leu) | 3,11 | Giebel | 0.3918% (1,104/281,766) | 0.997 | 27.2 |
|
| c.[575 C > A; 1205 G > A] | p.[(Ser192Tyr);(Arg402Gln)] | 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 | Norman | 25.02% (70,744/282,804) & 17.65% (49,703/281,606) | 0.974 & 0.994 | 24.2 & 29.4 |
|
| c.1118 C > A | p.(Thr373Lys) | 4, 6 | King | 0.0354% (100/282,382) | 0.004 | 23.5 |
|
| c.823 G > T | p.(Val275Phe) | 5 | Giebel | 0.0099% (28/282,378) | 0.42 | 11.17 |
|
| c.1392dupT | p.(Lys465*) | 10 | novel | not detected (0/251,158) | not applicable | not applicable |
|
| c.534 C > G | p.(Ile178Met) | 2 | novel | 0.0016% (4/250,998) | 0.701 | 22.1 |
|
| exon 2 to exon 5 deletion | exon 2 to exon 5 deletion | 2 | novel | not applicable | not applicable | not applicable |
|
| c.1327 G > A | p.(Val443Ile) | 5, 9 | Lee | 0.3055% (860/281,442) | 0.998 | 27.0 |
|
| c.2346deIG | p.(Thr783Hisfs*2) | 10 | novel | not detected (0/251,472) | not applicable | not applicable |
|
| c.1441 G > A, | p.(Ala481Thr) | 11 | Yuasa | 0.8427% (2,384/282,886) | 0.466 | 24.7 |
|
| c.208 G > A | p.(Ala70Thr) | 8 | Marti | 0.0242% (68/281,344) | 0.606 | 23.0 |
Polyphen-2[22] (http://genetics.bwh.harvard.edu/pph2/) predicts the impact of an amino acid substitution on a human protein using physical and comparative considerations. The output is a 0 to 1 score; the higher the score the more likely it is that the variant is pathogenic. Combined Annotation-Dependent Depletion[23] (CADD; https://cadd.gs.washington.edu/) combines information from many different in silico tools and uses a support vector machine classifier. The CADD score ranges from 1 to 99; a higher score indicates greater pathogenicity. Values ≥10 are predicted to be the 10% most deleterious substitutions and ≥ 20 in the 1% most deleterious. The overall gnomAD[26] (http://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/) minor allele frequency is presented. Polyphen-2, CADD and gnoMAD were all accessed on 23/01/2019.
Figure 1Ocular and electrodiagnostic findings in a patient with SLC38A8-associated disease (proband 2). (a,b) Anterior segment photographs of right (a) and left (b) eyes obtained at age 14 years. The arrows mark the location of the embryotoxa. (c,d) Linear optical coherence tomography (OCT) scan through the centre of the macula of the left eye demonstrating absence of the foveal depression in keeping with foveal hypoplasia. (c) The associated left colour fundus photograph highlighting the location of the scan (line in the middle of the green box) is also shown. This image (d) reveals that, although the central macula appears to be adequately pigmented, there is a degree of fundal hypopigmentation mid-peripherally. It is noteworthy that the proband is of white British background and her skin was not hypopigmented in the context of her family. These images were obtained when the patient was 12 years of age. (e) Monocular pattern and flash visual evoked potentials (VEPs) recorded from electrodes mounted 3 cm to right (O2) and left (O1) of midline. The patient was 14 years old at the time of testing. The difference plots are subtractions of left from right scalp recordings to show how scalp asymmetry is reversed in the two eyes (crossed asymmetry) when virtually all optic nerve fibres cross at the chiasm. (f) Difference plots recorded at age 9 months and 2.5 years, showing minimal or no crossed asymmetry; this is in contrast to the assessment at age 14 years, shown in (e), which was in keeping with marked crossed asymmetry.
Figure 2Schematic representation of the formation of the TYR c.[575 C > A;1205 G > A] p.[(Ser192Tyr);(Arg402Gln)] complex allele. (a) Basic pedigree including parental haplotypes from an individual (proband 6) carrying the TYR complex allele (red & orange stars) in trans with a TYR pathogenic allele (blue star). (b) Figure key for (a) explaining the variants present in each allele. Notably, each of c.575 C > A p.(Ser192Tyr) and c.1205 G > A p (Arg402Gln) has been shown to predispose to decreased pigmentation[40,41] and to result in reduced tyrosinase activity[11]. The minor allele frequencies (MAF) shown for these two variants are from the gnomAD variant database[25] (accessed 23/01/2019, European non-Finnish population). The MAF shown for the c.[575 C > A;1205 G > A] p.[(Ser192Tyr);(Arg402Gln)] complex allele is estimated using data from the “British in England & Scotland” subset of the 1000 genomes project[3].