| Literature DB >> 35029636 |
Charlotte C Kruijt1,2, Libe Gradstein3, Arthur A Bergen4,5,6, Ralph J Florijn4, Benoit Arveiler7,8, Eulalie Lasseaux8, Xavier Zanlonghi9, Laura Bagdonaite-Bejarano10, Anne B Fulton10,11, Claudia Yahalom12, Anat Blumenfeld12, Yonatan Perez13, Ohad S Birk13,14, Gerard C de Wit1, Nicoline E Schalij-Delfos2, Maria M van Genderen1,15.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to further expand the mutational spectrum of the Foveal Hypoplasia, Optic Nerve Decussation defect, and Anterior segment abnormalities (FHONDA syndrome), to describe the phenotypic spectrum, and to compare it to albinism. Subjects andEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35029636 PMCID: PMC8762694 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.63.1.19
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ISSN: 0146-0404 Impact factor: 4.799
Molecular Analyses Patients With FHONDA
| Family | Descent | ID | Mutations SLC38A8 Gene |
|---|---|---|---|
| I |
| 801 | Homozygous c.1002del; p.(Ser336Alafs*15) |
| I |
| 802 | Homozygous c.1002del; p.(Ser336Alafs*15) |
| I |
| 828 | Homozygous c.1002del; p.(Ser336Alafs*15) |
| II |
| 803 | One large deletion and c.1234G > A; p.(Gly412Arg) |
| III |
| 804 | c.260C > T; p.(Thr87Ile) and c.800T > G; p.(Leu267Arg) |
| III |
| 805 | c.260C > T; p.(Thr87Ile) and c.800T > G; p.(Leu267Arg)† |
| IV |
| 806 | c.598C > T; p.(Gln200*) and c.845_847del; p.(Ala282del) |
| IV |
| 807 | c.598C > T; p.(Gln200*) and c.845_847del; p.(Ala282del) |
| V |
| 808 | Homozygous c.598C > T; p.(Gln200*) |
| VI |
| 809 | c.697G > A; p.(Glu233Lys) and c.(805 + 1_806–1)_(1162 + 1_1163–1)del; p.(?) deletion exon 7 and 8 |
| VI |
| 810 | c.697G > A; p.(Glu233Lys) and c.(805 + 1_806–1)_(1162 + 1_1163–1)del; p.(?) deletion exon 7 and 8 |
| VII |
| 811 | c.160G > T; p.(Gly54*) and c.388 + 5G > A; p.(?) |
| VIII |
| 812 | c.(805 + 1_806–1)_(1162 + 1_1163–1)del; p.(?) deletion exon 7 and 8 and c.1256G > T p.(Gly419Val) |
| IX |
| 813 | Homozygous c.848A > C; p.(Asp283Ala) |
| IX |
| 814 | Homozygous c.848A > C; p.(Asp283Ala) |
| X |
| 815 | Homozygous c.95T > G; p.(Ile32Ser) |
| X |
| 816 | Homozygous c.95T > G; p.(Ile32Ser) |
| X |
| 817 | Homozygous c.95T > G; p.(Ile32Ser) |
| XI |
| 818 | Homozygous c.95T > G; p.(Ile32Ser) |
| XI |
| 819 | Homozygous c.95T > G; p.(Ile32Ser) |
| XII |
| 820 | Homozygous c.95T > G; p.(Ile32Ser) |
| XII |
| 821 | Homozygous c.95T > G; p.(Ile32Ser) |
| XII |
| 822 | Homozygous c.95T > G; p.(Ile32Ser) |
| XII |
| 823 | Homozygous c.95T > G; p.(Ile32Ser) |
| XIII |
| 824 | c.848A > C; p.(Asp283Ala) and whole gene deletion |
| XIV |
| 825 | Homozygous c.95T > G; p.(Ile32Ser) |
| XIV |
| 826 | Homozygous c.95T > G; p.(Ile32Ser) |
| XV |
| 827 | Homozygous c.848A > C; p.(Asp283Ala) |
Families are partially described previously, but we obtained additional information.,–, †Molecular analysis in siblings.
Figure 1.Schematic representation of the SLC38A8 gene. The location of the variants found in this study patients is represented on the right and of those retrieved from literature on the left, in grey. Exons are illustrated in orange and blue, transmembrane domains in green. Deletions are depicted at the location of the first deletion coordinate.
Phenotype Patients With FHONDA
| Family ID | Refraction RE, LE | VA | Nystagmus Type | Iris Translucency | Foveal Hypoplasia | Anterior Segment | Hypopigmentation Fundus | Misrouting |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | +1.25D/–1.75Dx179 +1.25D/–1.25Dx179 | 0.7 | Horizontal jerk | No | Grade 4 | Posterior embryotoxon | No | Yes |
| I | –4.5D/–4.25Dx88 –5.75D/–4.75Dx177 | 0.8 | Horizontal jerk | No | Grade 4 | Posterior embryotoxon | No | Yes |
| I-828 | ND | ND | Horizontal jerk | No | ND | Normal | No | Yes |
| II | +2.0D/–2.0Dx5 +2.25D/–2.0Dx180 | 0.7 | Horizontal jerk | No | Grade 4 | Posterior embryotoxon | No | Yes |
| III-804 | +4.5D/–2.75Dx4 +3.5D/–3.75Dx174 | 0.8 | Horizontal jerk | No | Grade 4 | Normal | No | Yes |
| III-805 | +4.75D/–2.00x180 +4.25D/–1.50x11 | 0.8 | Horizontal jerk | No | ND | Normal | No | Yes |
| IV | +6.0D/–3.5Dx175 +6.5D/–4.0Dx15 | 0.7 | Horizontal jerk | No | Grade 4 | Normal | No | Yes |
| IV | +7.0D/–2.0Dx180 +7.5D/–2.5Dx180 | 1.0 | Horizontal jerk | No | Grade 4 | Posterior embryotoxon | No | Yes |
| V-808 | +10.25D/–1.25Dx17 +10.25D/–2.0Dx176 | 0.8 | Horizontal jerk | No | Grade 4 | Normal | No | Yes |
| VI-809 | +7.0D/–1.0Dx180 +7.25D/–2.0Dx180 | 0.9 | Horizontal jerk | No | Grade 4 | Normal | No | ND |
| VI-810 | +2.75D/–1.75Dx180 +3.5D/–1.75Dx20 | 0.7 | Horizontal jerk | No | Grade 4 | Normal | No | ND |
| VII-811 | 0.0D/–2.5Dx180 0.0D/–2.5Dx180 | ND | Horizontal jerk | No | Grade 4 | Normal | Blond fundus at six months of age | ND |
| VIII-812 | +7.75D/–4.75Dx2 +7.75D/–4.50Dx2 | 0.7 | Yes, type unknown | No | Grade 4 | Normal | No | ND |
| IX-813 | +4.00D/–1.00Dx166 +6.25D/–2.75Dx25 | 0.6 | Horizontal jerk | No | Grade 4 | Normal | No | ND |
| IX-814 | –3.25D/–1.25Dx45 –3.25D/–2.00Dx170 | 0.6 | Horizontal jerk | No | Grade 4 | Normal | No | ND |
| X | +0.25D/–3.5Dx180 +0.25D/–3.75Dx25 | 0.8 | Horizontal jerk | No | Grade 4 | Normal | No | ND |
| X | +4.25D/–2.75Dx8 +5.0D/–3.0Dx180 | 0.8 | Horizontal jerk | No | Grade 4 | Normal | No | ND |
| X | +4.0D/–3.5Dx180 +4.25D/–3.25Dx170 | 0.7 | Horizontal jerk | No | ND | Normal | No | ND |
| XI | +5.5D/–2.5Dx5 +5.75D/–2.5Dx180 | 0.5 | Periodic alternating | No | ND | Normal | No | ND |
| XI | +6.5D/–1.75Dx180 +6.25D/–0.5Dx180 | 0.7 | Horizontal jerk | No | Grade 4 | Normal | No | ND |
| XII | –0.5D/–1.25Dx3 –0.75D/–1.5Dx7 | 1.0 | Horizontal jerk | No | ND | Normal | No | ND |
| XII | +2.75D/–2.0Dx25 +3.75D/–1.5Dx160 | 0.6 | Horizontal jerk | No | ND | Normal | No | ND |
| XII | –11.75D/–2.0Dx14 –7.75D/–0.75Dx153 | 0.6 | Horizontal jerk | No | ND | Normal | No | ND |
| XII | +1.5D/–1.75Dx170 +1.0D/–1.75Dx10 | 0.4 | Periodic alternating | No | ND | Normal | No | ND |
| XIII-824 | –6.5D/–3.25Dx180 –6.5D/–3.25Dx180 | ND | Yes, type unknown | No | ND | Normal | No | ND |
| XIV-825 | ND | 0.7 | Yes, type unknown | No | ND | Normal | No | ND |
| XIV-826 | +1.0D/–1.0Dx180 +2.0D/–0.5Dx180 | 0.5 | Yes, type unknown | No | Grade 4 | Normal | No | ND |
| XV-827 | +3.0D/–3.0Dx10 +4.0D/–2.5Dx10 | 0.8 | Yes, type unknown | No | ND | Normal | No | ND |
ND = not determined.
Families were partially described previously.,–,
Refraction right eye (RE) and left eye (LE).
Visual acuity in logMAR. VII-811 was not determined because patient was one year of age.
According to the grading of Thomas et al.
Figure 2.Clinical results. (A) Fundus images and optical coherence tomography scans of the clinical study patient VIII-812. (B) Fundus image and optical coherence tomography scan of clinical study patient III-804. (C) Example of a severely affected albinism patient. Note the completely translucent fundus accompanied by grade four foveal hypoplasia. The patient had two mutations in the TYR gene (c.164G > A and c.896G > A), visual acuity was 1.0 logMAR, and patient had nystagmus, and complete iris translucency. (D) Example of an albinism patient without obvious hypopigmentation of the fundus, comparable to patient FIII-804 with FHONDA. Note the minimal foveal hypoplasia grade 1. Other manifestations were also mild, with a suboptimal visual acuity of 0.3 logMAR, nystagmus, and absence of iris translucency. The patient was homozygote for mutation c.1037-7T > A in the TYR gene. All optical coherence tomography scans of the left eye and right eye had the same grade of foveal hypoplasia.
Figure 3.Chiasmal misrouting in FHONDA. (A) Visually evoked pattern onset potentials recordings of a normal subject. Note correlation of responses recorded from right and left eye in the differential signal. (B) Visually evoked pattern onset potentials from clinical study patient V-808. Note the asymmetry in the differential signal recorded from right eye and left eye. The chiasm coefficient was –0.9, indicating chiasmal misrouting.–
Figure 4.Phenotypic spectrum of FHONDA versus oculocutaneous albinism type 1, type 2, and ocular albinism. For the grading of foveal hypoplasia we used a grading scheme according to Thomas et al., with grades 1 and 2 not having incursion of the inner retinal layers, and grades 3 and 4 also affecting the photoreceptor differentiation (see Supplementary Table S1). Misrouting was determined by using cutoff values from the study of Kruijt et al. for the calculated chiasm coefficients from the multichannel visually evoked potential recordings.
Figure 5.Visually evoked potentials in FHONDA and albinism. The chiasm coefficients were calculated according to Kruijt et al. A negative chiasm coefficient indicates misrouting. This figure shows all test results, independently of age. Not all patients were tested with all stimuli, sometimes only the stimulus recommended for the age was used. Note the variability in albinism and the obvious misrouting in patients with FHONDA for all stimuli.