| Literature DB >> 35887175 |
Camilla Rocca1, Lucia Tiberi1,2, Sara Bargiacchi2, Viviana Palazzo2, Samuela Landini2, Elisa Marziali3, Roberto Caputo3, Francesca Tinelli4, Viviana Marchi4, Alessandro Benedetto4, Angelica Pagliazzi2, Giacomo Maria Bacci3.
Abstract
Oculocutaneous albinism is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by the presence of typical ocular features, such as foveal hypoplasia, iris translucency, hypopigmented fundus oculi and reduced pigmentation of skin and hair. Albino patients can show significant clinical variability; some individuals can present with only mild depigmentation and subtle ocular changes. Here, we provide a retrospective review of the standardized clinical charts of patients firstly addressed for evaluation of foveal hypoplasia and slightly subnormal visual acuity, whose diagnosis of albinism was achieved only after extensive phenotypic and genotypic characterization. Our report corroborates the pathogenicity of the two common TYR polymorphisms p.(Arg402Gln) and p.(Ser192Tyr) when both are located in trans with a pathogenic TYR variant and aims to expand the phenotypic spectrum of albinism in order to increase the detection rate of the albino phenotype. Our data also suggest that isolated foveal hypoplasia should be considered a clinical sign instead of a definitive diagnosis of an isolated clinical entity, and we recommend deep phenotypic and molecular characterization in such patients to achieve a proper diagnosis.Entities:
Keywords: OCA; TYR; Trios-WES; VEP; albinism; foveal hypoplasia; good BCVA; hypomorphic allele; misrouting
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35887175 PMCID: PMC9317384 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23147825
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Structural SD-OCT examination: note the different degrees of foveal hypoplasia (refer to Table 1 for grading). (a) Right eye. (b) Left eye.
Figure 2Slit-lamp examination: note the absence of iris translucency on retro-illumination. (a) Right eye. (b) Left eye; (images acquired with 10× magnification).
Figure 3Fundus photography showing the degree of retinal hypopigmentation according to Krujit classification. (a) Right eye. (b) Left eye; (45° wide angle acquisition).
Phenotypic data with a clinical distinction between major and minor criteria for albinism.
| Major Criteria | Minor Criteria | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||||
| ID | Sex | Age at Evaluation | Grading of FH | BCVA (LogMAR) | Iris | Nystagmus | Misrouting | Strabismus | Fundus | |
| RE | LE | |||||||||
|
| F | 8 | 3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | N | N | Y | Y | Grade 0 |
|
| M | 12 | 3 | 0.2 | 0.3 | N | N | Y | N | Grade 1 |
|
| M | 13 | 2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | N | N | Y | Y | Grade 1 |
|
| F | 14 | 2 | 0.2 | 0.2 | N | N | Y | N | Grade 1 |
|
| F | 17 | 2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | N | N | Y | N | Grade 1 |
|
| M | 19 | 3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | N | N | Y | N | Grade 1 |
|
| M | 10 | 2 | 0.1 | 0.1 | N | N | Y | Y | Grade 0 |
|
| M | 39 | 2 | 0 | 0.1 | N | N | Y | Y | Grade 0 |
BCVA: best corrected visual acuity; FH: foveal hypoplasia; Y: yes; N: no.
Genetic findings.
| ID | Family | Arg402Gln | Ser192Tyr | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient 1 | Proband | Het | Hom | c.230G>A p.Arg77Gln | [ |
| Father | WT | Hom | c.230G>A p.Arg77Gln | ||
| Mother | Hom | Het | - | ||
| Patient 2 | Proband | Hom | Het | c.739T>C p.Cys247Arg | [ |
| Father | Hom | Het | - | ||
| Mother | Het | WT | c.739T>C p.Cys247Arg | ||
| Patient 3 | Proband | WT | WT | c.286dupA p.Met96Asnfs*73 | [ |
| Father | WT | WT | c.325G>A p.Gly109Arg | ||
| Mother | WT | WT | c.286dupA p.Met96Asnfs*73 | ||
| Patients 4 and 5 | Proband | Het | Het | c.140G>A p.Gly47Asp | [ |
| Sister | Het | Het | c.140G>A p.Gly47Asp | ||
| Father | Het | Hom | - | ||
| Mother | Het | WT | c.140G>A p.Gly47Asp | ||
| Patient 6 | Proband | Hom | Het | c.1A>G p.Met1Val | [ |
| Father | Het | Hom | - | ||
| Mother | Het | Het | c.1A>G p.Met1Val | ||
| Patients 7 and 8 | Proband | Hom | Het | c.455C>G p.Pro152Arg | - |
| Father | Hom | Het | c.455C>G p.Pro152Arg | - | |
| Mother | Het | Hom | - |
Het: heterozygous, Hom: homozygous, WT: wild type.
Figure A2Family pedigrees (in red TYR pathogenic variants, in light green the p.(Ser192Tyr) polymorphism and in dark green the p.(Arg402Gln)polymorphism).
Detailed variant information.
| gDNA | cDNA | Protein | dbSNP | GnomAD v2.1.1 | ACMG | ACMG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| chr11-88911351-G-A | c.230G>A | p.Arg77Gln | rs61753185 | 0.00007227 | PM1, PM2, PM5, PP2, PP3, PP5 | Pathogenic |
| chr11-88911860-T-C | c.739T>C | p.Cys247Arg | rs367543068 | n.a. | PM1, PM2, PP2, PP3, PP5 | Pathogenic |
| chr11-88911406-C-CA | c.286dupA | p.Met96Asnfs*73 | rs61753190 | n.a. | PVS1, PM2, PP5 | Pathogenic |
| chr11-88911261-G-A | c.140G>A | p.Gly47Asp | rs61753180 | 0.0001556 | PM1, PM2, PM5, PP2, PP3, PP5 | Pathogenic |
| chr11-88911446-G-A | c.325G>A | p.Gly109Arg | rs61753253 | 0.00006366 | PM1, PM2, PM5, PP2, PP3, PP5 | Pathogenic |
| chr11-88911122-A-G | c.1A>G | p.Met1Val | rs28940881 | 0.00006718 | PS1, PVS1, PM2, PP5 | Pathogenic |
| chr11-88911576-C-G | c.455C>G | p.Pro152Arg | n.a. | n.a. | PM1, PM2, PM5, PP2 | Likely Pathogenic |
MAF: minor allele frequency; n.a. not available.
Figure 4Misrouting of the optic pathway. (a) Pearson’s coefficient of correlation computed between the OS and OD mean differential activity (OL-OR, from 0.07 to 0.3 s). Each bar represents a patient (color codes for patients is consistent across panels, see panel c). The within-subject correlation was statistically significant for all patients (p ≤ 0.0011. Asterisks mark the statistical significance: *** < 0.001, ** < 0.01). (b) Chiasm coefficient computed between the OS and OD mean differential activity (OL-OR, from 0.07 to 0.1 s). Each bar represents a patient. (c) Scatter plot showing the average differential activity for both OS and OD. Each dot represents a patient. All the dots scattered above the equality line (thick, black) indicate the presence of a significant interhemispheric difference (p > 0.001). The topoplot inset shows the grand-average difference between OS and OD from 0.07 to 0.1 s, confirming the presence of an interhemispheric difference mostly expressed over occipital electrodes. (d) Grand-average differential (OL-OR) activity for OS (red) and OD (blue). The inset reports the position of two sets of electrodes of interest (OL in dark red, OR in dark blue).
Figure A1Single-subject misrouting effects. Left panel shows the typical interhemispheric asymmetry for a control albino patient. The plot shows the differential (OL–OR) activity for OS (red) and OD (blue). The lower topoplot shows the difference between OS and OD from 0.07 to 0.1 s (grey area), confirming the presence of an interhemispheric difference mostly expressed over occipital electrodes. Right panel is the same as the left panel but for each patient from the current study.