Literature DB >> 33799947

Equivalent Weight: Connecting Exoskeleton Effectiveness with Ergonomic Risk during Manual Material Handling.

Christian Di Natali1, Giorgia Chini1, Stefano Toxiri1, Luigi Monica2, Sara Anastasi2, Francesco Draicchio3, Darwin G Caldwell1, Jesús Ortiz1.   

Abstract

Occupational exoskeletons are becoming a concrete solution to mitigate work-related musculoskeletal disorders associated with manual material handling activities. The rationale behind this study is to search for common ground for exoskeleton evaluators to engage in dialogue with corporate Health & Safety professionals while integrating exoskeletons with their workers. This study suggests an innovative interpretation of the effect of a lower-back assistive exoskeleton and related performances that are built on the benefit delivered through reduced activation of the erector spinae musculature. We introduce the concept of "equivalent weight" as the weight perceived by the wearer, and use this to explore the apparent reduced effort needed when assisted by the exoskeleton. Therefore, thanks to this assistance, the muscles experience a lower load. The results of the experimental testing on 12 subjects suggest a beneficial effect for the back that corresponds to an apparent reduction of the lifted weight by a factor of 37.5% (the perceived weight of the handled objects is reduced by over a third). Finally, this analytical method introduces an innovative approach to quantify the ergonomic benefit introduced by the exoskeletons' assistance. This aims to assess the ergonomic risk to support the adoption of exoskeletons in the workplace.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assistive technologies; biomechanical models—spine; job risk assessment; low back; manual material handling; spine

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33799947      PMCID: PMC7967312          DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18052677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health        ISSN: 1660-4601            Impact factor:   3.390


  56 in total

Review 1.  Exoskeletons for industrial application and their potential effects on physical work load.

Authors:  Michiel P de Looze; Tim Bosch; Frank Krause; Konrad S Stadler; Leonard W O'Sullivan
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 2.  The relationship between electromyogram and muscle force.

Authors:  A L Hof
Journal:  Sportverletz Sportschaden       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 1.077

3.  A new muscle co-activation index for biomechanical load evaluation in work activities.

Authors:  Alberto Ranavolo; Silvia Mari; Carmela Conte; Mariano Serrao; Alessio Silvetti; Sergio Iavicoli; Francesco Draicchio
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 4.  What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention.

Authors:  Jan Hartvigsen; Mark J Hancock; Alice Kongsted; Quinette Louw; Manuela L Ferreira; Stéphane Genevay; Damian Hoy; Jaro Karppinen; Glenn Pransky; Joachim Sieper; Rob J Smeets; Martin Underwood
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 5.  Causal assessment of occupational lifting and low back pain: results of a systematic review.

Authors:  Eugene K Wai; Darren M Roffey; Paul Bishop; Brian K Kwon; Simon Dagenais
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 6.  Trunk muscle activation in low-back pain patients, an analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Jaap H van Dieën; Luc P J Selen; Jacek Cholewicki
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.368

7.  SPEXOR passive spinal exoskeleton decreases metabolic cost during symmetric repetitive lifting.

Authors:  S J Baltrusch; J H van Dieën; A S Koopman; M B Näf; C Rodriguez-Guerrero; J Babič; H Houdijk
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Scientific basis of the OCRA method for risk assessment of biomechanical overload of upper limb, as preferred method in ISO standards on biomechanical risk factors.

Authors:  Daniela Colombini; Enrico Occhipinti
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 5.024

9.  The impact of chronic low back pain on older adults: a comparative study of patients and controls.

Authors:  Thomas E Rudy; Debra K Weiner; Susan J Lieber; Jill Slaboda; Robert J Boston
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2007-02-20       Impact factor: 7.926

10.  Pneumatic Quasi-Passive Actuation for Soft Assistive Lower Limbs Exoskeleton.

Authors:  Christian Di Natali; Ali Sadeghi; Alessio Mondini; Eliza Bottenberg; Bernard Hartigan; Adam De Eyto; Leonard O'Sullivan; Eduardo Rocon; Konrad Stadler; Barbara Mazzolai; Darwin G Caldwell; Jesús Ortiz
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  1 in total

1.  Assessment of a Passive Lumbar Exoskeleton in Material Manual Handling Tasks under Laboratory Conditions.

Authors:  Sofía Iranzo; Alicia Piedrabuena; Fernando García-Torres; Jose Luis Martinez-de-Juan; Gema Prats-Boluda; Mercedes Sanchis; Juan-Manuel Belda-Lois
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 3.847

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.