| Literature DB >> 31718009 |
Tamás Jernei1, Cintia Duró2, Antonio Dembo2, Eszter Lajkó3, Angéla Takács3, László Kőhidai3, Gitta Schlosser1,4, Antal Csámpai2.
Abstract
By means of copper(I)-and ruthenium(II)-catalyzed click reactions of quinine- and quinidine-derived alkynes with azide-substituted chalcones a systematic series of novel cinchona-chalcone hybrid compounds, containing 1,4-disubstituted- and 1,5-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazole linkers, were synthesized and evaluated for their cytotoxic activity on four human malignant cell lines (PANC-1, COLO-205, A2058 and EBC-1). In most cases, the cyclization reactions were accompanied by the transition-metal-catalyzed epimerization of the C9-stereogenic centre in the cinchona fragment. The results of the in vitro assays disclosed that all the prepared hybrids exhibit marked cytotoxicity in concentrations of low micromolar range, while the C9-epimerized model comprising quinidine- and (E)-1-(4-(3-oxo-3-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)prop-1-en-1-yl)phenyl) fragments, connected by 1,5-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazole linker, and can be regarded as the most potent lead of which activity is probably associated with a limited conformational space allowing for the adoption of a relatively rigid well-defined conformation identified by DFT modelling. The mechanism of action of this hybrid along with that of a model with markedly decreased activity were approached by comparative cell-cycle analyses in PANC-1 cells. These studies disclosed that the hybrid of enhanced antiproliferative activity exerts significantly more extensive inhibitory effects in subG1, S and G2/M phases than does the less cytotoxic counterpart.Entities:
Keywords: 1,2,3-triazole; cell cycle analysis; chalcone; cinchona; cytotoxicity; hybrid compounds; structure-activity relationships
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31718009 PMCID: PMC6891474 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24224077
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Synthesis of chalcones bearing azido-group.
Designation and isolated yields of azidochalcones 2a–d and 4a–d prepared by the appropriate method.
| Product | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | Method | Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| OCH3 | H | H | H | (i) | 67 |
|
| H | H | OCH3 | H | (i) | 55 |
|
| H | OCH3 | OCH3 | OCH3 | (i) | 43 |
|
| H | CH3 | OH | CH3 | (ii) | 25 |
|
| OCH3 | H | H | H | (i) | 70 |
|
| H | H | OCH3 | H | (i) | 75 |
|
| H | OCH3 | OCH3 | OCH3 | (i) | 75 |
|
| H | CH3 | OH | CH3 | (ii) | 25 |
Scheme 2Synthesis of cinchona-chalcone hybrids with the 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazole linker.
Designation and isolated yields of cinchona-chalcone hybrids types 6, 7, 9 and 10 with 1,4-disubstituted [1,2,3]triazole linker (see: Scheme 2).
| Product | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| OCH3 | H | H | H | 91 |
|
| H | H | OCH3 | H | 72 |
|
| H | OCH3 | OCH3 | OCH3 | 74 |
|
| H | CH3 | OH | CH3 | 30 |
|
| H | CH3 | OH | CH3 | 50 |
|
| OCH3 | H | H | H | 56 |
|
| H | H | OCH3 | H | 79 |
|
| H | OCH3 | OCH3 | OCH3 | 61 |
|
| H | CH3 | OH | CH3 | 21 |
|
| OCH3 | H | H | H | 62 |
|
| H | H | OCH3 | H | 43 |
|
| H | OCH3 | OCH3 | OCH3 | 50 |
|
| H | OCH3 | OCH3 | OCH3 | 17 |
|
| H | CH3 | OH | CH3 | 37 |
|
| H | CH3 | OH | CH3 | 53 |
|
| OCH3 | H | H | H | 19 |
|
| H | H | OCH3 | H | 62 |
|
| H | OCH3 | OCH3 | OCH3 | 57 |
|
| H | CH3 | OH | CH3 | 24 |
Scheme 3Synthesis of cinchona-chalcone hybrids with the 1,5-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazole linker.
List of cinchona-chalcone hybrids with 1,5-disubstituted-1,2,3-triazole linker and yields.
| Product | R1 | R2 | R3 | Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| OCH3 | OCH3 | OCH3 | 40 |
|
| CH3 | OH | CH3 | 31 |
|
| OCH3 | OCH3 | OCH3 | 60 |
|
| CH3 | OH | CH3 | 51 |
Figure 1Diagnostic NOE (Nuclear Overhauser Effect) interactions detected in hybrid compounds 6d, 6*d and 12c.
Cytotoxic activity of cinchona-chalcone hybrids expressed in IC50 values on four human tumour cell lines.
| Tested Compound | IC50 [µM] a | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PANC-1 | COLO-205 | A2058 | EBC-1 | |
|
| 9.67 ± 0.95 | 3.61 ± 0.71 | 11.03 ± 1.46 | 2.51 ± 0.21 |
|
| 43.18 ± 1.21 | 4.37 ± 0.98 | 10.84 ±1.52 | 2.74 ± 0.23 |
|
| 23.35 ± 0.59 | 8.32 ± 0.75 | 23.42 ± 5.09 | 3.47 ± 0.44 |
|
| 6.83 ± 0.65 | 3.85 ± 1.14 | 3.49 ± 0.01 | 2.01 ± 0.16 |
|
| 8.48 ± 1.73 | 1.90 ± 0.11 | 5.87 ± 0.48 | 1.49 ± 0.33 |
|
| 2.45 ± 0.12 | 1.09 ± 0.06 | 2.51 ± 0.06 | 0.95 ± 0.02 |
|
| 9.77 ± 0.44 | 2.06 ± 0.12 | 4.92 ± 0.08 | 1.73 ± 0.20 |
|
| 6.95 ± 1.91 | 1.65 ± 0.10 | 3.90 ± 0.09 | 1.53 ± 0.23 |
|
| 11.19 ±1.83 | 7.39 ± 0.64 | 4.42 ± 0.40 | 1.44 ± 0.03 |
|
| 9.16 ± 0.51 | 6.54 ± 0.59 | 15.39 ± 2.26 | 4.15 ± 0.38 |
|
| 2.43 ± 0.69 | 2.21 ± 0.12 | 2.64 ± 0.12 | 1.66 ± 0.30 |
|
| 9.01 ± 1.58 | 4.46 ± 0.20 | 9.72 ± 0.54 | 7.80 ± 0.11 |
|
| 5.74 ± 0.31 | 4.77 ± 0.63 | 2.93 ± 0.01 | 2.49 ± 0.07 |
|
| 5.06 ± 0.38 | 1.54 ± 0.07 | 12.46 ± 1.98 | 2.93 ± 0.21 |
|
| 6.59 ± 0.85 | 1.33 ± 0.40 | 3.44 ± 0.13 | 0.87 ± 0.04 |
|
| 4.85 ± 0.18 | 1.81 ± 0.34 | 7.10 ± 0.27 | 1.58 ± 0.26 |
|
| 5.38 ± 0.35 | 1.42 ± 0.41 | 7.58 ± 0.16 | 1.61 ± 0.21 |
|
| 4.74 ± 0.19 | 5.04 ± 0.64 | 2.48 ± 0.01 | 1.70 ± 0.06 |
|
| 13.35 ±2.19 | 5.96 ± 0.53 | 18.87 ± 3.51 | 4.50 ± 0.12 |
|
| 3.72 ± 0.81 | 1.04 ± 0.02 | 2.63 ± 0.04 | 1.89 ± 0.72 |
|
| 4.44 ± 0.17 | 2.53 ± 0.14 | 4.50 ± 0.31 | 6.50 ± 0.80 |
|
| 9.27 ± 0.33 | 3.56 ± 0.28 | 5.60 ± 0.79 | 2.99 ± 0.54 |
|
| 2.75 ± 0.15 | 10.98 ± 3.16 | 15.60 ± 1.60 | 6.14 ± 0.18 |
|
| 2.26 ± 0.22 | 0.90 ± 0.12 | 1.81 ± 0.18 | 0.55 ± 0.12 |
|
| 9.46 ± 0.78 | 0.66 ± 0.02 | 1.42 ± 0.27 | 1.47 ± 0.48 |
a IC50 value measured after a treatment of 72 h.
Figure 2Optimized structure of hybrid 12c generated by B3LYP/6-31+G(d) method in vacuo.
Figure 3Effects of 10b and 12c on the cell cycle progression of PANC-1 cells. The model cell was treated with the compounds at their IC50 concentration for 24 h. Results are expressed as a percentage of cells in the subG1 phase ((A)—10b and (B)—12c) and the major phases (G1/G0, S and G2/M) of the cell cycle ((C)—10b and (D)—12c). Data shown in the figure represent mathematical averages of two parallel measurements.