Literature DB >> 31715272

Multiplex PCR Based Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) Analysis Compared to Traditional Urine Culture in Identifying Significant Pathogens in Symptomatic Patients.

Kirk J Wojno1, David Baunoch2, Natalie Luke3, Michael Opel3, Howard Korman4, Colleen Kelly5, S Mohammad A Jafri4, Patrick Keating4, Dylan Hazelton4, Stephany Hindu4, Bridget Makhloouf4, David Wenzler4, Mansour Sabry4, Frank Burks4, Miguel Penaranda3, David E Smith3, Andrew Korman4, Larry Sirls4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether multiplex PCR-based molecular testing is noninferior to urine culture for detection of bacterial infections in symptomatic patients.
METHODS: Retrospective record review of 582 consecutive elderly patients presenting with symptoms of lower urinary tract infection (UTI) was conducted. All patients had traditional urine cultures and PCR molecular testing run in parallel.
RESULTS: A total of 582 patients (mean age 77; range 60-95) with symptoms of lower UTI had both urine cultures and diagnostic PCR between March and July 2018. PCR detected uropathogens in 326 patients (56%, 326/582), while urine culture detected pathogens in 217 patients (37%, 217/582). PCR and culture agreed in 74% of cases (431/582): both were positive in 34% of cases (196/582) and both were negative in 40% of cases (235/582). However, PCR and culture disagreed in 26% of cases (151/582): PCR was positive while culture was negative in 22% of cases (130/582), and culture was positive while PCR was negative in 4% of cases (21/582). Polymicrobial infections were reported in 175 patients (30%, 175/582), with PCR reporting 166 and culture reporting 39. Further, polymicrobial infections were identified in 67 patients (12%, 67/582) in which culture results were negative. Agreement between PCR and urine culture for positive cultures was 90%, exceeding the noninferiority threshold of 85% (95% conflict of interest 85.7%-93.6%).
CONCLUSION: Multiplex PCR is noninferior to urine culture for detection and identification of bacteria. Further investigation may show that the accuracy and speed of PCR to diagnose UTI can significantly improve patient outcomes.
Copyright © 2019 Pathnostics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31715272     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.10.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  13 in total

1.  Concordance Between Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Susceptibility in Symptomatic Urinary Tract Infections.

Authors:  David Baunoch; Natalie Luke; Dakun Wang; Annah Vollstedt; Xinhua Zhao; Dicken S C Ko; Shuguang Huang; Patrick Cacdac; Larry T Sirls
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-08-19       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 2.  Forty Years of Molecular Diagnostics for Infectious Diseases.

Authors:  Jonathan E Schmitz; Charles W Stratton; David H Persing; Yi-Wei Tang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 11.677

3.  Accuracy of molecular diagnostic techniques in patients with a confirmed urine culture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ximena Guzmán Robledo; Karla Valeria Orejuela Arcila; Sergio Hernando Mina Riascos; Herney Andrés García-Perdomo
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 2.052

4.  Cross-sectional internet survey exploring women's knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding urinary tract infection-related symptoms in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Stefan Martinus Leonardus Cox; Minke W E M van Hoof; Kelly Lo-A-Foe; Geert-Jan Dinant; Guy J Oudhuis; Paul Savelkoul; Jochen W L Cals; Eefje G P M de Bont
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 5.  Current and Future Molecular Diagnostics of Tick-Borne Diseases in Cattle.

Authors:  Kathryn Garcia; Mina Weakley; Tram Do; Sheema Mir
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2022-05-21

Review 6.  A guide for urogynecologic patient care utilizing telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: review of existing evidence.

Authors:  Cara L Grimes; Ethan M Balk; Catrina C Crisp; Danielle D Antosh; Miles Murphy; Gabriela E Halder; Peter C Jeppson; Emily E Weber LeBrun; Sonali Raman; Shunaha Kim-Fine; Cheryl Iglesia; Alexis A Dieter; Ladin Yurteri-Kaplan; Gaelen Adam; Kate V Meriwether
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  Feasibility and potential significance of rapid in vitro qualitative phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli with the ProMax system.

Authors:  Jade Chen; Michael Tomasek; Amorina Cruz; Matthew L Faron; Dakai Liu; William H Rodgers; Vincent Gau
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Rising prevalence of multidrug-resistant uropathogenic bacteria from urinary tract infections in pregnant women.

Authors:  Umema Asmat; Muhammad Z Mumtaz; Arif Malik
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2020-11-11

9.  Diagnostic value of different urine tests for urinary tract infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rong Xie; Xinli Li; Guangquan Li; Rong Fu
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2022-03

Review 10.  A New Gold Rush: A Review of Current and Developing Diagnostic Tools for Urinary Tract Infections.

Authors:  Raymond Xu; Nicholas Deebel; Randy Casals; Rahul Dutta; Majid Mirzazadeh
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.