Literature DB >> 33770124

Feasibility and potential significance of rapid in vitro qualitative phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli with the ProMax system.

Jade Chen1, Michael Tomasek1, Amorina Cruz2, Matthew L Faron2, Dakai Liu3, William H Rodgers3,4, Vincent Gau1.   

Abstract

The emergence and evolution of antibiotic resistance has been accelerated due to the widespread use of antibiotics and a lack of timely diagnostic tests that guide therapeutic treatment with adequate sensitivity, specificity, and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) accuracy. Automated AST instruments are extensively used in clinical microbiology labs and provide a streamlined workflow, simplifying susceptibility testing for pathogenic bacteria isolated from clinical samples. Although currently used commercial systems such as the Vitek2 and BD Phoenix can deliver results in substantially less time than conventional methods, their dependence on traditional AST inoculum concentrations and optical detection limit their speed somewhat. Herein, we describe the GeneFluidics ProMax lab automation system intended for a rapid 3.5-hour molecular AST from clinical isolates. The detection method described utilizes a higher starting inoculum concentration and automated molecular quantification of species-specific 16S rRNA through the use of an electrochemical sensor to assess microbiological responses to antibiotic exposure. A panel of clinical isolates consisting of species of gram-negative rods from the CDC AR bank and two hospitals, New York-Presbyterian Queens and Medical College of Wisconsin, were evaluated against ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and meropenem in a series of reproducibility and clinical studies. The categorical agreement and reproducibility for Citrobacter freundii, Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella aerogenes, Klebsiella oxytoca, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were 100% and 100% for ciprofloxacin, 98.7% and 100% for gentamicin and 98.5% and 98.5% for meropenem, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33770124      PMCID: PMC7996979          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  24 in total

Review 1.  Common errors in diagnosis and management of urinary tract infection. I: pathophysiology and diagnostic techniques.

Authors:  M Franz; W H Hörl
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.992

2.  Evidence of uncultivated bacteria in the adult female bladder.

Authors:  Alan J Wolfe; Evelyn Toh; Noriko Shibata; Ruichen Rong; Kimberly Kenton; MaryPat Fitzgerald; Elizabeth R Mueller; Paul Schreckenberger; Qunfeng Dong; David E Nelson; Linda Brubaker
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Use of electrochemical DNA biosensors for rapid molecular identification of uropathogens in clinical urine specimens.

Authors:  Joseph C Liao; Mitra Mastali; Vincent Gau; Marc A Suchard; Annette K Møller; David A Bruckner; Jane T Babbitt; Yang Li; Jeffrey Gornbein; Elliot M Landaw; Edward R B McCabe; Bernard M Churchill; David A Haake
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Development of an advanced electrochemical DNA biosensor for bacterial pathogen detection.

Authors:  Joseph C Liao; Mitra Mastali; Yang Li; Vincent Gau; Marc A Suchard; Jane Babbitt; Jeffrey Gornbein; Elliot M Landaw; Edward R B McCabe; Bernard M Churchill; David A Haake
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 5.  Antibiotic prescribing for acute respiratory tract infections in primary care: a systematic review and meta-ethnography.

Authors:  Sarah Tonkin-Crine; Lucy Yardley; Paul Little
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 6.  The role of whole genome sequencing in antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria: report from the EUCAST Subcommittee.

Authors:  M J Ellington; O Ekelund; F M Aarestrup; R Canton; M Doumith; C Giske; H Grundman; H Hasman; M T G Holden; K L Hopkins; J Iredell; G Kahlmeter; C U Köser; A MacGowan; D Mevius; M Mulvey; T Naas; T Peto; J-M Rolain; Ø Samuelsen; N Woodford
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 8.067

7.  RNA signatures allow rapid identification of pathogens and antibiotic susceptibilities.

Authors:  Amy K Barczak; James E Gomez; Benjamin B Kaufmann; Ella R Hinson; Lisa Cosimi; Mark L Borowsky; Andrew B Onderdonk; Sarah A Stanley; Devinder Kaur; Kevin F Bryant; David M Knipe; Alexander Sloutsky; Deborah T Hung
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Combination therapy for treatment of infections with gram-negative bacteria.

Authors:  Pranita D Tamma; Sara E Cosgrove; Lisa L Maragakis
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Accurate identification of fastidious Gram-negative rods: integration of both conventional phenotypic methods and 16S rRNA gene analysis.

Authors:  Maria G de Melo Oliveira; Susanne Abels; Reinhard Zbinden; Guido V Bloemberg; Andrea Zbinden
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2013-07-16       Impact factor: 3.605

View more
  2 in total

1.  Phenotypic microbial response to antimicrobial exposure conditions with a molecular analysis quantification of species-specific 16S rRNA content.

Authors:  Jade Chen; Michael Tomasek; Eliseo Nuñez; Vincent Gau
Journal:  MethodsX       Date:  2021-07-24

2.  Rapid Electrochemical-Based PCR-Less Microbial Quantification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling Directly From Blood and Urine With Unknown Microbial Load or Species.

Authors:  Jade Chen; Eduardo Navarro; Eliseo Nuñez; Vincent Gau
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-09-16
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.