Brian Chan1,2, Elizabeth Hulen3,4, Samuel Edwards5,3, Matthew Mitchell2, Christina Nicolaidis5,6,7, Somnath Saha5,3. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon chanbri@ohsu.edu. 2. Central City Concern, Portland, Oregon. 3. Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, Portland, Oregon. 4. Department of Sociology, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon. 5. Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon. 6. School of Social Work, Portland State University, Portland, Oregon. 7. School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University and Portland State University, Portland, Oregon.
Abstract
PURPOSE: High-need high-cost (HNHC) patients consume a large proportion of health resources but often receive suboptimal care in traditional primary care. Intensive ambulatory care interventions attempt to better meet these patients' needs, but we know little about how teams delivering these interventions in clinics serving socially complex patient populations perceive their work. METHODS: We performed a qualitative study of multidisciplinary staff experiences at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) caring for predominantly homeless HNHC patients in the context of an ongoing implementation of an ambulatory intensive care unit (A-ICU) intervention. We conducted semistructured interviews with 9 ambulatory intensive care team members and 6 "usual care" members. We conducted a thematic analysis, using an inductive approach, at a semantic level. RESULTS: Staff viewed complexity as a combination of social, behavioral, and medical challenges that lead to patient-health care system mismatch. Staff perceive the following as key ingredients in caring for HNHC patients: addressing both psychosocial and clinical needs together; persistence in staying connected to patients through chaotic periods; shared commitment and cohesion among interdisciplinary team members; and flexibility to tailor care to patients' individual situations. Participants' definitions of success focused more on improving patient engagement than reducing utilization or cost. CONCLUSION: FQHC staff working with HNHC patients perceive mismatch between the health care system and patients' clinical and social needs as the key driver of poor outcomes for these patients. Intensive ambulatory care teams may bridge mismatch through provision of psychosocial supports, flexible care delivery, and fostering team cohesion to support patient engagement.
PURPOSE: High-need high-cost (HNHC) patients consume a large proportion of health resources but often receive suboptimal care in traditional primary care. Intensive ambulatory care interventions attempt to better meet these patients' needs, but we know little about how teams delivering these interventions in clinics serving socially complexpatient populations perceive their work. METHODS: We performed a qualitative study of multidisciplinary staff experiences at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) caring for predominantly homeless HNHC patients in the context of an ongoing implementation of an ambulatory intensive care unit (A-ICU) intervention. We conducted semistructured interviews with 9 ambulatory intensive care team members and 6 "usual care" members. We conducted a thematic analysis, using an inductive approach, at a semantic level. RESULTS: Staff viewed complexity as a combination of social, behavioral, and medical challenges that lead to patient-health care system mismatch. Staff perceive the following as key ingredients in caring for HNHC patients: addressing both psychosocial and clinical needs together; persistence in staying connected to patients through chaotic periods; shared commitment and cohesion among interdisciplinary team members; and flexibility to tailor care to patients' individual situations. Participants' definitions of success focused more on improving patient engagement than reducing utilization or cost. CONCLUSION: FQHC staff working with HNHC patients perceive mismatch between the health care system and patients' clinical and social needs as the key driver of poor outcomes for these patients. Intensive ambulatory care teams may bridge mismatch through provision of psychosocial supports, flexible care delivery, and fostering team cohesion to support patient engagement.
Authors: Wendy L Bennett; Craig W Robbins; Elizabeth A Bayliss; Renee Wilson; Heather Tabano; Richard A Mularski; Wiley V Chan; Milo Puhan; Tsung Yu; Bruce Leff; Tianjing Li; Kay Dickersin; Carol Glover; Katie Maslow; Karen Armacost; Suzanne Mintz; Cynthia M Boyd Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-03-27 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Adeyemi Okunogbe; Lisa S Meredith; Evelyn T Chang; Alissa Simon; Susan E Stockdale; Lisa V Rubenstein Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2017-10-02 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jean Yoon; Evelyn Chang; Lisa V Rubenstein; Angel Park; Donna M Zulman; Susan Stockdale; Michael K Ong; David Atkins; Gordon Schectman; Steven M Asch Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Brian Chan; Samuel T Edwards; Meg Devoe; Richard Gil; Matthew Mitchell; Honora Englander; Christina Nicolaidis; Devan Kansagara; Somnath Saha; P Todd Korthuis Journal: Addict Sci Clin Pract Date: 2018-12-14
Authors: Christine Vogeli; Alexandra E Shields; Todd A Lee; Teresa B Gibson; William D Marder; Kevin B Weiss; David Blumenthal Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Margae Knox; Emily E Esteban; Elizabeth A Hernandez; Mark D Fleming; Nadia Safaeinilli; Amanda L Brewster Journal: BMJ Open Qual Date: 2022-06
Authors: Michelle S Wong; Tana M Luger; Marian L Katz; Susan E Stockdale; Nate L Ewigman; Jeffrey L Jackson; Donna M Zulman; Steven M Asch; Michael K Ong; Evelyn T Chang Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-05-13 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Lillian Gelberg; Samuel T Edwards; Elizabeth R Hooker; Meike Niederhausen; Andrew Shaner; Brianna J Cowan; Carole M Warde Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-09-30 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Lucas Zellmer; Bryan Johnson; Ahmed Idris; Christopher J Mehus; Iris W Borowsky Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-07-30 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Cynthia F Corbett; Kenn B Daratha; Sterling McPherson; Crystal L Smith; Michael S Wiser; Brenda K Vogrig; Sean M Murphy; Roy Cantu; Dennis G Dyck Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 3.390