Danielle F Loeb1, Ingrid A Binswanger2, Carey Candrian3, Elizabeth A Bayliss4. 1. University of Colorado, Division of General Internal Medicine, Aurora, Colorado Danielle.loeb@ucdenver.edu. 2. University of Colorado, Division of General Internal Medicine, Aurora, Colorado Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado. 3. University of Colorado, Division of General Internal Medicine, Aurora, Colorado. 4. Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Denver, Colorado University of Colorado, Department of Family Medicine, Aurora, Colorado.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Primary care physicians play unique roles caring for complex patients, often acting as the hub for their care and coordinating care among specialists. To inform the clinical application of new models of care for complex patients, we sought to understand how these physicians conceptualize patient complexity and to develop a corresponding typology. METHODS: We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with internal medicine primary care physicians from 5 clinics associated with a university hospital and a community health hospital. We used systematic nonprobabilistic sampling to achieve an even distribution of sex, years in practice, and type of practice. The interviews were analyzed using a team-based participatory general inductive approach. RESULTS: The 15 physicians in this study endorsed a multidimensional concept of patient complexity. The physicians perceived patients to be complex if they had an exacerbating factor-a medical illness, mental illness, socioeconomic challenge, or behavior or trait (or some combination thereof)-that complicated care for chronic medical illnesses. CONCLUSION: This perspective of primary care physicians caring for complex patients can help refine models of complexity to design interventions or models of care that improve outcomes for these patients.
PURPOSE: Primary care physicians play unique roles caring for complex patients, often acting as the hub for their care and coordinating care among specialists. To inform the clinical application of new models of care for complex patients, we sought to understand how these physicians conceptualize patient complexity and to develop a corresponding typology. METHODS: We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with internal medicine primary care physicians from 5 clinics associated with a university hospital and a community health hospital. We used systematic nonprobabilistic sampling to achieve an even distribution of sex, years in practice, and type of practice. The interviews were analyzed using a team-based participatory general inductive approach. RESULTS: The 15 physicians in this study endorsed a multidimensional concept of patient complexity. The physicians perceived patients to be complex if they had an exacerbating factor-a medical illness, mental illness, socioeconomic challenge, or behavior or trait (or some combination thereof)-that complicated care for chronic medical illnesses. CONCLUSION: This perspective of primary care physicians caring for complex patients can help refine models of complexity to design interventions or models of care that improve outcomes for these patients.
Keywords:
chronic care; comorbidity/multimorbidity; key informant/depth interviewing; mental health; practice-based research; primary care issues; qualitative methods; social factors in health and health care
Authors: Juliette M Slomka; John D Piette; Edward P Post; Sarah L Krein; Zongshan Lai; David E Goodrich; Amy M Kilbourne Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2012-02-21 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Danielle F Loeb; Elizabeth A Bayliss; Ingrid A Binswanger; Carey Candrian; Frank V deGruy Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-02-28 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Richard W Grant; Jeffrey M Ashburner; Clemens S Hong; Clemens C Hong; Yuchiao Chang; Michael J Barry; Steve J Atlas Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2011-12-20 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: F C Stiefel; P de Jonge; F J Huyse; P Guex; J P Slaets; J S Lyons; J Spagnoli; M Vannotti Journal: Gen Hosp Psychiatry Date: 1999 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 3.238
Authors: David Grembowski; Judith Schaefer; Karin E Johnson; Henry Fischer; Susan L Moore; Ming Tai-Seale; Richard Ricciardi; James R Fraser; Donald Miller; Lisa LeRoy Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Elizabeth H B Lin; Susan R Heckbert; Carolyn M Rutter; Wayne J Katon; Paul Ciechanowski; Evette J Ludman; Malia Oliver; Bessie A Young; David K McCulloch; Michael Von Korff Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2009 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Donna M Zulman; Steven M Asch; Susana B Martins; Eve A Kerr; Brian B Hoffman; Mary K Goldstein Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-10-01 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Elizabeth Grier; Dara Abells; Ian Casson; Meg Gemmill; Jessica Ladouceur; Amanda Lepp; Ullanda Niel; Samantha Sacks; Kyle Sue Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Suranga N Kasthurirathne; Joshua R Vest; Nir Menachemi; Paul K Halverson; Shaun J Grannis Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Ashok Reddy; Laura Sessums; Reshma Gupta; Janel Jin; Tim Day; Bruce Finke; Asaf Bitton Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Brendon Colaco; Daniel Herold; Matthew Johnson; Daniel Roellinger; James M Naessens; Timothy I Morgenthaler Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2018-04-15 Impact factor: 4.062
Authors: Brian Chan; Elizabeth Hulen; Samuel Edwards; Matthew Mitchell; Christina Nicolaidis; Somnath Saha Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Leah Tuzzio; Andrew L Berry; Kathy Gleason; Jennifer Barrow; Elizabeth A Bayliss; Marlaine Figueroa Gray; Thomas Delate; Zoe Bermet; Connie S Uratsu; Richard W Grant; James D Ralston Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2021-08-25 Impact factor: 3.734