Adeyemi Okunogbe1,2, Lisa S Meredith3,4,5, Evelyn T Chang5,6,7, Alissa Simon5, Susan E Stockdale5,7, Lisa V Rubenstein3,8. 1. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA. okunogbe@rand.org. 2. Pardee RAND Graduate School, Santa Monica, CA, USA. okunogbe@rand.org. 3. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA, USA. 4. Pardee RAND Graduate School, Santa Monica, CA, USA. 5. VA HSR&D Center for Healthcare Innovation, Implementation and Policy, Sepulveda, CA, USA. 6. Department of Community Care, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 7. Department of Psychiatry and Bio-behavioral Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 8. Department of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Care coordination is a critical component of managing high-risk patients, who tend to have complex and multiple medical and psychosocial problems and are typically at high risk for increased hospitalization and incur high health care expenditures. Primary care models such as the patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) are designed to improve care coordination and reduce care fragmentation. However, little is known about how the burden of care coordination for high-risk patients influences PCMH team members' stress. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between provider stress and care coordination time in high-risk patient care and whether availability of help is associated with reduced stress. STUDY DESIGN: Multivariable regression analysis of a cross-sectional survey of PCMH primary care providers (PCPs) and nurses. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 164 PCPs and 272 nurses in primary care practices at five geographically diverse Veteran Health Administration (VA) medical center health systems. MAIN MEASURES: The main outcome variable was provider stress due to high-risk patient care. Independent variables were the reported proportion of high-risk patients in PCP/nurse patient panels, time spent coordinating care for these patients, and provider satisfaction with help received in caring for them. KEY RESULTS: The response rate was 44%. Spending more than 8 h per week coordinating care was significantly associated with a 0.21-point increase in reported provider stress compared to spending 8 h or less per week (95% CI: 0.04-0.39; p = 0.015). The magnitude of the association between stress and care coordination time was diminished when provider satisfaction with help received was included in the model. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived provider stress from care of high-risk patients may arise from challenges related to coordinating their care. Our findings suggest that the perception of receiving help for high-risk patient care may be valuable in reducing provider stress.
BACKGROUND: Care coordination is a critical component of managing high-risk patients, who tend to have complex and multiple medical and psychosocial problems and are typically at high risk for increased hospitalization and incur high health care expenditures. Primary care models such as the patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs) are designed to improve care coordination and reduce care fragmentation. However, little is known about how the burden of care coordination for high-risk patients influences PCMH team members' stress. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between provider stress and care coordination time in high-risk patient care and whether availability of help is associated with reduced stress. STUDY DESIGN: Multivariable regression analysis of a cross-sectional survey of PCMH primary care providers (PCPs) and nurses. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 164 PCPs and 272 nurses in primary care practices at five geographically diverse Veteran Health Administration (VA) medical center health systems. MAIN MEASURES: The main outcome variable was provider stress due to high-risk patient care. Independent variables were the reported proportion of high-risk patients in PCP/nurse patient panels, time spent coordinating care for these patients, and provider satisfaction with help received in caring for them. KEY RESULTS: The response rate was 44%. Spending more than 8 h per week coordinating care was significantly associated with a 0.21-point increase in reported provider stress compared to spending 8 h or less per week (95% CI: 0.04-0.39; p = 0.015). The magnitude of the association between stress and care coordination time was diminished when provider satisfaction with help received was included in the model. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived provider stress from care of high-risk patients may arise from challenges related to coordinating their care. Our findings suggest that the perception of receiving help for high-risk patient care may be valuable in reducing provider stress.
Entities:
Keywords:
Care coordination; High-risk patients; Patient-centered medical home model; Primary care; Provider stress
Authors: Christian D Helfrich; Emily D Dolan; Joseph Simonetti; Robert J Reid; Sandra Joos; Bonnie J Wakefield; Gordon Schectman; Richard Stark; Stephan D Fihn; Henry B Harvey; Karin Nelson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Oliver T Nguyen; Kea Turner; Nate C Apathy; Tanja Magoc; Karim Hanna; Lisa J Merlo; Christopher A Harle; Lindsay A Thompson; Eta S Berner; Sue S Feldman Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2022-01-29 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Brian Chan; Elizabeth Hulen; Samuel Edwards; Matthew Mitchell; Christina Nicolaidis; Somnath Saha Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2019-11 Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Evelyn T Chang; Steven M Asch; Jessica Eng; Frances Gutierrez; Angela Denietolis; David Atkins Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-09-10 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Audrey L Jones; Adam J Gordon; Sonya E Gabrielian; Ann Elizabeth Montgomery; John R Blosnich; Allyson L Varley; Aerin J deRussy; Erika L Austin; April E Hoge; Young-Il Kim; Lillian Gelberg; Stefan G Kertesz Journal: Med Care Date: 2021-06-01 Impact factor: 3.178
Authors: Katherine M Reitz; Lauren Terhorst; Clair N Smith; Insiyah K Campwala; Maryanna S Owoc; Stephanie M Downs-Canner; Emilia J Diego; Galen E Switzer; Matthew R Rosengart; Sara P Myers Journal: PLoS One Date: 2021-11-19 Impact factor: 3.240