Literature DB >> 31711375

Mechanisms underlying the virulence regulation of new Vibrio alginolyticus ncRNA Vvrr1 with a comparative proteomic analysis.

Yanfei Zuo1, Lingmin Zhao1, Xiaojin Xu1, Jiaonan Zhang2, Jiaolin Zhang2, Qingpi Yan1, Lixing Huang1.   

Abstract

The incidence of Vibrio alginolyticus infections has increased in recent years due to the influence of climate change and rising sea temperature. Vibrio virulence regulatory RNA 1 (Vvrr1) is a newly found noncoding RNA (ncRNA) predicted to be closely related to the adhesion ability of V. alginolyticus based on the previous RNA-seq. In this study, the target genes of Vvrr1 were fully screened and verified by constructing Vvrr1-overexpressing strains and using the proteome sequencing technology. Pyruvate kinase I (pykF) gene was predicted to be a chief target gene of Vvrr1 involved in virulence regulation. The adhesion ability, biofilm formation and virulence were significantly reduced in the Vvrr1-overexpressing and the pykF-silenced strain compared with the wild strains. Similar to the overexpression of Vvrr1, the silencing of pykF also reduced the expression level of virulence genes, such as ndk, eno, sdhB, glpF, and cysH. Meanwhile, by constructing the "pykF-GFP" fusion expression plasmid and using the GFP reporter gene analysis in Escherichia coli, the fluorescence intensity of the strain containing Vvrr1 whole ncRNA sequence vector was found to be significantly weakened. These indicated that Vvrr1 participated in the virulence regulation mechanism of V. alginolyticus by interacting with the virulence gene pykF.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NcRNA; Vibrio alginolyticus; Vvrr1; pykf; virulence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31711375      PMCID: PMC6853220          DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2019.1687261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect        ISSN: 2222-1751            Impact factor:   7.163


Introduction

Vibrio alginolyticus, a gram-negative halophilic bacterium distributed worldwide [1], is a normal inhabitant of coastal and estuarine environments in warm tropical regions. It also represents one of the leading opportunistic pathogens for people who consume raw or undercooked contaminated seafood or engage in water activity. It may cause severe soft tissue infections, sepsis, and other extraintestinal infections [2-7]. V. alginolyticus is one of roughly a dozen Vibrio species that cause human illness and significant morbidity (multiple surgeries, prolonged antibiotic treatment, amputations, and other complications can occur) and mortality [8,9]. The incidence of V. alginolyticus infections has increased, perhaps owing in part to the spread of V. alginolyticus favored by climate change and rising seawater temperature [10]. V. alginolyticus infections were reported to the Cholera and Other Vibrio Illness Surveillance (COVIS) system in the USA since 1988. The surveillance started in the Gulf Coast states and has expanded over time, and Vibrio infection became nationally notifiable in 2007. An analysis of both COVIS data and data from the 10-state Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network (FoodNet) from 1996 to 2010 showed a dramatic increase in the incidence of V. alginolyticus infection in both systems [2]. Using data from 1988 to 2012, Newton et al. also categorized infections using specimen source and exposure history, analyzed case characteristics, and calculated the incidence rates using the US Census Bureau data [11]. The reported incidence of infections increased 12-fold over the study period, although the extent of diagnostic or surveillance bias was unclear. For many years, V. alginolyticus was the third most common Vibrio species reported in human illness, but it has been the second most common Vibrio species since 2007 due to increasing overall vibriosis rates, despite substantial increases in other species [12]. Considering that V. alginolyticus is an emerging microbe that causes severe infections in both humans and marine animals [13,14], a better understanding of the pathogenic mechanism of V. alginolyticus infection is urgently needed to guide the effective prevention and therapy for V. alginolyticus infection. The major virulence factors of V. alginolyticus are quorum sensing (QS), extracellular proteases, motility, siderophore-dependent iron uptake systems, biofilm, adhesion, type III secretion systems (T3SS), and type VI secretion systems (T6SS) [15]. QS systems are intricately regulated as the global regulatory networks of gene expression in bacteria. In V. alginolyticus, a V. harveyi–like QS signaling system was characterized, which involved pivotal LuxO and LuxR regulators [16-21]. Multiple virulence factors and some other virulence-related genes were closely regulated by the QS system in V. alginolyticus. For example, in V. alginolyticus, motility and biofilm formation were proposed as important virulence-associated factors that could be regulated by QS [22-24]. AphA, another master regulator of QS, could also modulate the in vivo survival of V. alginolyticus in zebrafish [25]. In addition, QS was proved to control the activation of T6SS2 in V. alginolyticus [26,27]. Some studies also explored the role of other virulence factors in V. alginolyticus, but in general, most of the studies on V. alginolyticus in the last 20 years focused on virulence-related genes. Bacterial noncoding (nc) RNAs are often small regulatory RNAs (<500 nt) [28]. To date, more than 100 ncRNAs have been identified in Escherichia coli [29]. Most chromosome-encoded ncRNAs are found to interact directly with their target mRNAs, thus influencing the translation initiation and/or mRNA stability [30]. A short complementary region of about 7–9 bp is commonly required for ncRNA–mRNA interaction [31]. Although the conventional RNA interference (i) pathway has not yet been identified in bacteria, bacterial ncRNAs have displayed several key roles in many biological processes by binding to the mRNA targets [32,33]. Bacterial ncRNAs regulate responses to environmental stresses [29], including translation control, RNA degradation, and RNA processing. They have been shown to regulate a wide variety of biological processes, including secretion, QS, stress responses, biofilm formation, adhesion, and virulence [34-36]. Despite detailed studies on bacterial ncRNAs, the functions of most of the bacterial ncRNAs have not been verified. Especially the role of ncRNAs in virulence regulation is still poorly understood. At present, only a very small number of ncRNAs are specifically elucidated in the regulation of virulence. For example, 4.5S RNA deletion mutation results in a significant reduction in the virulence of Streptococcus pyogenes [37]. RNA III has been shown to regulate the expression of multiple virulence genes in S. pneumoniae [36]. At present, the study of ncRNA in Vibrio focuses mainly on V. cholerae and V. harveyi [38]. Thus, determining the respective functions of bacterial ncRNAs remains a major challenge. A previous study [28] first explored the ncRNAs and genes in V. alginolyticus cultured under normal and stress conditions, such as Cu2+, Pb2+, Hg2+, and low pH, using RNA-seq to gain a broad spectrum of expression of potential ncRNAs and genes associated with the bacterial adhesion. It also aimed to provide new clues for further understanding the mechanisms underlying the adhesion regulation in V. alginolyticus. Vibrio virulence regulatory RNA 1 (Vvrr1) is a new ncRNA found in V. alginolyticus using RNA-seq. Its expression level significantly increased in V. alginolyticus strains with impaired adhesion ability in the presence of heavy metal ions and under low-pH stress, indicating that Vvrr1 might be closely related to the adhesion ability of V. alginolyticus. In this study, the target genes of Vvrr1 were fully screened and verified by constructing Vvrr1-overexpressing strains and using the proteome sequencing technology. pykF was found to be a chief target gene of Vvrr1 involved in virulence regulation. The molecular mechanism of Vvrr1 involved in the virulence regulation of V. alginolyticus was further revealed by exploring the mechanism of Vvrr1 regulating target genes and clarifying the influence of target genes on the virulence phenotype.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and culture conditions

Pathogenic V. alginolyticus (ND-01) was isolated from naturally infected Pseudosciaena crocea and previously identified as pathogenic by subsequent artificial infection. Bacteria were preserved in physiological saline with 10% glycerol at −80°C [1]. The ND-01 strain was routinely grown in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium at 28°C with shaking at 220 rpm. E. coli DH5α was obtained from TransGen Biotech (Beijing, China), which was grown in LB medium (37°C, 220 rpm).

Construction of Vvrr1- and pykF-overexpressing strains

Competent bacterial cells were collected as mentioned earlier [39]. The study involved the pACYC184 vector, containing a short hairpin RNA (shRNA) comprising the entire sequence of Vvrr1, and a nontarget shRNA as control (5′-TTC TCC GAA CGT GTC ACG TTT-3′). The vector was transferred into SM10 using heat shock and then transferred via conjugation from SM10 to V. alginolyticus. Chloromycetin was used to screen positive clones [28]. The expression level of Vvrr1 was detected by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The pykF-overexpressing strain was constructed with the pET28a vector. The full length of pykF was ligated to the linearized pET28a vector using T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs) based on the manufacturer’s recommendations. The vector was transferred into SM10 using heat shock and then transferred via conjugation from SM10 to V. alginolyticus. Kanamycin was used to screen the positive clones. Finally, the expression level of pykF was evaluated by qRT-PCR.

Construction of Vvrr1 mutant strain

Based on the V. alginolyticus Vvrr1 gene sequence, primers with homologous arms were designed with Primer Premier 5.0 and synthesized (Table S1). The 5′ termini of the primers were homologous to the 35-bp upstream and downstream flanking regions of the Vvrr1 gene. The 3′ termini of the primers were homologous to the end of the tetracycline resistance gene. After PCR amplification, the targeting fragments (with tetracycline resistance) of Vvrr1 was constructed. Plasmid pKD46 was transformed into V. alginolyticus and cultured to an OD600 = 0.3. After adding 30 mmol/L L-arabinose, the recombinant enzymes Exo, Bet, and Gam of pKD46 were fully expressed. The targeting fragments were then transformed into V. alginolyticus by electroporation. The positive clones were screened using tetracycline (10 μg/mL), and positive colonies were selected for PCR analysis and gene sequencing verification [40].

Proteome analysis

Proteomics analysis was carried out with the iTRAQ technology (Applied Biosystems Incorporation). The protein was extracted from the Vvrr1-overexpressing strain and ND-01 (n = 3). The samples were labeled with iTRAQ reagents as described by Ye et al. [41]. LC-MS/MS analyses were carried out using an LTQ Orbitrap Velos (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with an Agilent 1100 binary high-pressure liquid chromatography pump (Agilent Technologies) and a FAMOS autosampler (LC Packings). Scaffold Q+ was used for protein identification and quantification with iTRAQ. Further quantitative data analyses were qualified on unique proteins with at least two unique peptides and a false discovery rate (FDR) <0.01. The fold changes in protein abundance were defined as the median ratios of all significantly matched spectra with tag signals [41]. The peak identification, establishment of a reference database, and peptide and protein identification were conducted. GO functional classification annotation and KEGG pathway annotation were performed on all identified proteins, and differential proteins were screened and analyzed according to the differences in multiples and P values (P value < 0.05). The result of iTRAQ has been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD014375.

Construction of gene-silenced strain

The pykF-, ndk-, eno-, sdhB-, glpF-, and cysH-silenced strain were constructed as previously described [42]. The shRNA sequences targeting pykF, ndk, eno, sdhB, glpF, and cysH were designed and synthesized by Shanghai Generay Biotech Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China) (Table S1). After linearizing pACYC184 vectors with the restriction enzymes BamHI and SphI (New England Biolabs, USA), the oligonucleotides were annealed and ligated to the linearized pACYC184 vectors using T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. The recombinant pACYC184 vectors were transferred into SM10 using heat shock and then transferred via conjugation from SM10 to V. alginolyticus. Chloromycetin was used to screen the positive clones. Finally, the expression levels of pykF, ndk, eno, sdhB, glpF, and cysH of each RNAi strain were detected using qRT-PCR.

GFP reporter gene analysis

The full-length sequence of pykF with or without the interaction sequence against Vvrr1 was synthesized by Shanghai Generay Biotech Co., Ltd. After linearizing pET28a-GFP vectors and pykF or pykFΔIS gene with the restriction enzymes KpnI and HindIII (TransGen Biotech), the pykF or pykFΔIS gene was ligated to the linearized pET28a-GFP vectors using T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. The recombinant pET28a-GFP-pykF or pET28a-GFP-pykFΔIS vectors were transferred into the competent E. coli DH5α cells using heat shock. Kanamycin was used to screen the positive clones. Then, the pACYC184 vector containing the entire ncRNA sequence of Vvrr1 with or without the interaction sequence against pykF was transferred into the positive clones by electrotransformation. Single bacterial colonies were screened with kanamycin and chloromycetin. The fluorescence was observed using a fluorescence microscope and imaged with a digital video camera.

Flow cytometric analysis

The flow cytometric analysis was performed using a method modified from another study [43]. Single bacterial colonies were inoculated in 2 mL of LB medium containing kanamycin and chloromycetin and grown at 37°C and 220 rpm for 12 h. A culture volume corresponding to one OD600 per milliliter was mixed with 1 mL of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (pH 7.4) containing 4% paraformaldehyde and centrifuged for 2 min at 7500 g. The pellets were resuspended in 1 mL of 1× PBS. For flow cytometry analysis, 1/1000 dilutions in 1× PBS were prepared and measured on a CyFlow Space machine. Biological triplicates were prepared for every sample.

RNA extraction and reverse transcription

TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) was used for total RNA extraction from bacterial cells following the manufacturer’s protocol. Reverse transcription was carried out with a Reverse Aid Mu-MLV cDNA synthesis kit (TransGen Biotech) from 2.0 mg total RNA following the manufacturer’s protocol [44].

qRT-PCR

qRT-PCR was carried out using a QuantStudio 6 Flex real-time PCR system (Life Technologies). All primer sequences are provided in Table S1. The expression levels of bacterial genes were normalized using gyrB rRNA. The 2−ΔΔCt method was used to calculate the relative level of gene expression [45].

Northern blot analysis

For the Northern blot analysis of Vvrr1, 20 mg total RNA was loaded into each lane, and ribosomal RNA bands were visualized using ethidium bromide staining. The 5′-biotin-labeled oligonucleotides used as probes are listed in Table S1. The probes were detected on the membranes using the streptavidin–Alexa Fluor 680 conjugate (Invitrogen, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocols.

In vitro adhesion assay

The bacterial adhesion was assayed, as described by Huang et al. [28]. A total of 20 µL of the mucus was evenly spread onto a glass slide area of 22 × 22 mm2. After fixing with methanol for 30 min, 200 µL of the bacterial suspension (108 CFU/mL) was added onto the mucus-coated glass slides. After incubating at 28°C for 2 h in a humidified chamber, the slides were washed five times with PBS to remove nonadherent bacterial cells. Finally, the adhering bacterial cells were fixed with 4% methanol for 30 min, dyed with crystal violet for 3 min, and observed under a microscope (×1000). The average number of bacteria adhering to a field of view of the glass surface was then determined. For each assay, 20 fields of view were counted, and the average value was calculated.

Growth curve assay

V. alginolyticus strains were overnight grown at 28°C in LB and adjusted to OD600 nm = 0.05. Then, 50 μL of the bacterial culture was mixed with 150 μL of LB per well of a 96-well plate and then incubated at 28°C. The concentration of the bacterial solution was measured every hour for a total of 24 h, and the values of OD600 nm were recorded. From the OD600 nm data, the growth curves were plotted to compare the wild-type, overexpressing strain and RNAi strain [46].

Hemolysis assay

Hemolysis assays were carried out as described by Tsou and Zhu [47]. Sheep blood (Ping Rui Biotechnology Co. Ltd. Beijing, China) was washed three times with PBS. A total of 5 μL of the washed sheep blood was mixed with 245 μL of culture supernatants and incubated at 37°C for 1 h with shaking (150 rpm). After incubation, the samples were centrifuged, and the released hemoglobin content was measured using OD540 nm. The percentage of total hemolysis was calculated by comparing the OD540 nm of the samples with positive (ddH2O) and negative controls (PBS). Three independent biological replicates were performed for each data point.

Biofilm assay

The biofilm assay for V. alginolyticus was performed as described by Luo et al. [39]. V. alginolyticus strains were overnight grown at 28°C in LB and then adjusted to OD600 nm = 0.2. A total of 50 μL of the bacterial culture was mixed with 150 μL of LB per well of a 96-well plate and then incubated at 28°C for 24 h. Then, it was washed twice with sterile PBS, incubated with 175 μL of crystal violet (0.1%) for 15 min, washed with sterile PBS, and air-dried. The stained biofilm was solubilized with 200 μL of 33% acetic acid and then quantitated by measuring OD590 nm. Six independent biological replicates were performed for each data point.

Soft agar plate motility assay

The soft agar method was used to assay the motility of V. alginolyticus strains. Fresh overnight cultures were diluted to an OD600 nm of 0.3 in LB. The cell suspension (1 μL/drop) was dropped onto the center of semisolid agar plates (LB broth + 0.3% agar), and the plates were allowed to incubate overnight at 28°C before measuring the colony diameters. Three independent biological replicates were performed per group.

Artificial infection and sampling

Epinephelus coioides (average weight 50.0 ± 2.0 g) fish were obtained from Zhangzhou (Fujian, China) and acclimatized at 18°C for 1 week under specific pathogen-free laboratory conditions. Fish were tested to be healthy using sera agglutination and bacteriological recovery tests. E. coioides fish were divided into several groups (n = 10 in each group; triplicates were used for each experiment) and grown in 500-L tanks with constant aeration and a flow-through setup. For the survival assays, the weight-matched E. coioides fish were intrapleurally injected with 103 CFU/g of V. alginolyticus (wild-type, overexpressing strain or RNAi strain). E. coioides intrapleurally injected with PBS were used as negative control. The water temperature during infection was 18 ± 1°C. The daily mortality of infected E. coioides was recorded [48].

Statistical analysis

The results were reported as mean ± SD. The data were statistically analyzed with one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple-comparison tests via SPSS 13.0 software. A P value <0.05 was used to indicate a significant difference.

Ethics statement

All animal experiments were conducted strictly based on the recommendations in the “Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” set by the National Institutes of Health. The animal protocols were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Jimei University (Acceptance No. JMULAC201159).

Results

Proteomic analysis of Vvrr1-overexpressing strain and ND-01 strain

Vvrr1 was an ncRNA comprising 105 nucleotides identified using RNA-seq and predicted to be responsible for the impaired adhesion ability under environmental stress (Figure 1A and 1B). In the present study, the existence of Vvrr1 was successfully validated by Northern blot analysis, revealing a ∼105-nt RNA expressed from the positive strand in V. alginolyticus. Meanwhile, the Northern blot analysis showed that the expression level of Vvrr1 significantly increased under stresses, including Cu2+, Pb2+, Hg2+, and low pH, which was consistent with the results of previous RNA-seq (Figure 1C). To further document the necessity of Vvrr1 for adhesion regulation under environmental stress, the Vvrr1 knockout strain was constructed (Figure 1D) and its adhesion ability under different stresses was tested. The results showed that the decline of bacterial adhesion was rescued when Vvrr1 was knocked out (Figure 1E).
Figure 1

. (A) Sequence of Vvrr1. (B) Secondary-structural prediction for Vvrr1 identified in V. alginolyticus. (C) Expression level of Vvrr1 in V. alginolyticus under stresses detected by the Northern blot analysis (lower panel). The ribosomal (r) RNA bands stained with ethidium bromide (upper panel) were used as loading controls. (D) Construction and confirmation of the knockout mutant strain ΔVvrr1. WT: Amplification of wild-type using primers Vvrr1mut-F-R; ΔVvrr1: amplification of ΔVvrr1 using primers Vvrr1mut-F-R. (E) Comparison of adhesion ability in wild-type and ΔVvrr1 strains. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Three independent biological replicates were performed per group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. (F) Expression level of Vvrr1 in the wild-type and Vvrr1-overexpressing strains identified by qRT-PCR. Data are shown as mean ± SD from three independent biological replicates. **P < 0.01.

. (A) Sequence of Vvrr1. (B) Secondary-structural prediction for Vvrr1 identified in V. alginolyticus. (C) Expression level of Vvrr1 in V. alginolyticus under stresses detected by the Northern blot analysis (lower panel). The ribosomal (r) RNA bands stained with ethidium bromide (upper panel) were used as loading controls. (D) Construction and confirmation of the knockout mutant strain ΔVvrr1. WT: Amplification of wild-type using primers Vvrr1mut-F-R; ΔVvrr1: amplification of ΔVvrr1 using primers Vvrr1mut-F-R. (E) Comparison of adhesion ability in wild-type and ΔVvrr1 strains. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Three independent biological replicates were performed per group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. (F) Expression level of Vvrr1 in the wild-type and Vvrr1-overexpressing strains identified by qRT-PCR. Data are shown as mean ± SD from three independent biological replicates. **P < 0.01. To investigate the function of Vvrr1, a Vvrr1-overexpressing strain was constructed, which significantly increased the expression level of Vvrr1 by 23.4-fold (± 1.1) (Figure 1F). The quantitative proteomic analysis was used to compare the expression levels of proteins in the Vvrr1-overexpressing strain and ND-01 strain, and significant changes in protein expression levels were observed (Figure 2). The results revealed 3062 proteins in the species, of which 219 were differentially expressed (66 upregulated and 153 downregulated). A total of 26 and 18 proteins were significantly upregulated and downregulated, respectively (P < 0.05), while 40 and 135 proteins were extremely significantly upregulated and downregulated, respectively (P < 0.01) (Table S2). The qRT-PCR was performed on randomly selected genes to validate the results of sequencing. The results of qRT-PCR matched the sequencing results (Figure 3A). These data reinforced the reliability of the sequencing data.
Figure 2.

(A) Differential protein visualization scatter map. The horizontal and vertical coordinates represent the protein expressions in the two groups. (B) Volcano plot of differential proteins. The abscissa is the multiple change value of protein difference between the two groups, and the ordinate is the statistical t test P value of the protein expression difference. Each point in the figure represents a specific protein: the yellow point represents the protein significantly upregulated at P < 0.05, the red point represents the protein significantly upregulated at P < 0.01, the light blue point represents the protein significantly downregulated at P < 0.01, the blue point represents the protein significantly downregulated at P < 0.01, and the black point represents the nonsignificantly differentially differentiated protein. (C) Hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed proteins. Green and red indicate decreased and increased expression, respectively.

Figure 3.

qRT-PCR analysis of the expression of virulence genes in wild-type, Vvrr1-overexpressing (A), ΔVvrr1, pykF-overexpressing (B) and pykF-RNAi (C) strains. Data are presented as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

(A) Differential protein visualization scatter map. The horizontal and vertical coordinates represent the protein expressions in the two groups. (B) Volcano plot of differential proteins. The abscissa is the multiple change value of protein difference between the two groups, and the ordinate is the statistical t test P value of the protein expression difference. Each point in the figure represents a specific protein: the yellow point represents the protein significantly upregulated at P < 0.05, the red point represents the protein significantly upregulated at P < 0.01, the light blue point represents the protein significantly downregulated at P < 0.01, the blue point represents the protein significantly downregulated at P < 0.01, and the black point represents the nonsignificantly differentially differentiated protein. (C) Hierarchical clustering of differentially expressed proteins. Green and red indicate decreased and increased expression, respectively. The functions of the differentially expressed proteins were analyzed according to GO, and the upregulated and downregulated proteins mapped to every term were counted. This analysis categorized 219 differentially expressed proteins into 27 secondary classifications (data not shown). The analysis of GO categories showed that most of the differentially expressed proteins were involved in the following functional categories: metabolic process, cellular process, membrane, membrane part, cell part, binding, and catalytic activity. The number of proteins involved in catalytic activity and metabolic processes was the largest. According to this analysis, 66 upregulated and 153 downregulated proteins were categorized into 25 and 20 enriched functional groups, respectively (data not shown). The enrichment ratio of the upregulated and downregulated proteins involved in carbon utilization and biological adhesion was the highest. The differentially expressed proteins were extremely significantly enriched in localization, membrane, membrane part, transporter activity, and catalytic activity (Data not shown). Next, the pathway analysis of differentially expressed proteins was performed on the basis of the latest version of the KEGG database (https://www.kegg.jp/), and the differentially expressed proteins were assigned to 60 KEGG pathways (data not shown). The results revealed that the protein enrichment ratio in the TCA cycle and the sulfur metabolism pathway was the highest, and the significance was the strongest (P < 0.001). To obtain the interaction relationship between differentially expressed proteins, the STRING database (https://string-db.org/) was used for prediction and analysis. Figure S1 shows that the protein PykF acted as a hub protein, having maximum connectivity. Further, eno and ndk were directly related to pykF, and the correlation was strong. sdhB, glpF, and cysH had an indirect and relatively weak correlation with pykF (Figure S1). To validate the regulatory effect of Vvrr1 on the hub protein PykF encoding gene, the expression level of pykF was detected in the Vvrr1 knockout strain. The results showed that when Vvrr1 was knocked out, the expression level of pykF increased, which was consistent with the results of qRT-PCR in the Vvrr1-overexpressing strain and indicated a negative regulatory effect of Vvrr1 on pykF (Figure 3B). To determine the correlation between the aforementioned five genes and pykF, the pykF-silencing strain was constructed and the silencing effect and the expression level of other genes in the silencing strain were further verified with qRT-PCR. This revealed that the expression levels of the five genes significantly reduced when pykF was silenced (Figure 3C), indicating a positive regulatory effect of pykF on them. qRT-PCR analysis of the expression of virulence genes in wild-type, Vvrr1-overexpressing (A), ΔVvrr1, pykF-overexpressing (B) and pykF-RNAi (C) strains. Data are presented as mean ± S.D. (n = 3). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. IntaRNA was used to predict the interactions between Vvrr1 and the mRNA of significantly changed proteins. The interaction network diagram of Vvrr1 with its potential target genes was predicted with the STRING database (Figure S2). When Vvrr1 was overexpressed, the protein expression levels of sdhA, relA, msrA, pykF, and hutU decreased, and a number of other proteins connected with them. Figures S1 and S2 show that pykF was a common gene in the two network diagrams. This implied that pykF was not only regulated by Vvrr1, but also a hub in the protein interaction regulation network, which might have biological importance. Therefore, it was selected as the potential key target gene of Vvrr1 for further study.

Regulatory effect of Vvrr1 and its target genes on V. alginolyticus virulence

The growth curves of wild-type, Vvrr1-overexpressing, and pykF-RNAi strains were evaluated. The results showed that the growth rate of Vvrr1-overexpressing and pykF-RNAi strains increased slightly compared with the wild-type strain (Figure 4A). It indicated that ncRNA Vvrr1 and pykF gene were probably involved in the growth of V. alginolyticus. The comparison of biofilm formation and adhesion among wild-type, Vvrr1-overexpressing, pykF-RNAi, Vvrr1 knockout + Vvrr1-overexpressing, Vvrr1-overexpressing + pykF-overexpressing, and Vvrr1 knockout + pykF-RNAi strains showed that Vvrr1 and pykF played a role in the biofilm development and adhesion of V. alginolyticus (Figure 4B and 4C). However, the Vvrr1-overexpressing and pykF-RNAi strains showed no significant difference in hemolysis and motility compared with the wild-type strain (Figure 4D–F). These results indicated that Vvrr1 and pykF gene contributed to the multiple steps of the pathogenesis of V. alginolyticus. The artificial infection also displayed a significantly reduced virulence of the Vvrr1-overexpressing strain and the pykF-RNAi strain (Figure 4G). Meanwhile, the contribution of ndk, eno, sdhB, glpF, and cysH to the adhesion ability and biofilm formation was detected after their gene silencing (Figure 4H–4J), suggesting that eno, sdhB, glpF, and cysH were involved in the regulation of adhesion ability and biofilm formation, while ndk was involved only in the regulation of adhesion ability.
Figure 4.

The growth curve (A), biofilm formation (B), adhesion ability (C), hemolysis (D), motility (E and F) and survival rate (G) were measured in wild-type, Vvrr1-overexpressing, pykF-RNAi, Vvrr1 knockout + Vvrr1-overexpressing, Vvrr1-overexpressing + pykF-overexpressing, and Vvrr1 knockout + pykF-RNAi strains. The contribution of ndk, eno, sdhB, glpF and cysH to the biofilm formation (I) and the adhesion ability (J) were compared after gene silencing (H). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Three independent biological replicates were performed per group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

The growth curve (A), biofilm formation (B), adhesion ability (C), hemolysis (D), motility (E and F) and survival rate (G) were measured in wild-type, Vvrr1-overexpressing, pykF-RNAi, Vvrr1 knockout + Vvrr1-overexpressing, Vvrr1-overexpressing + pykF-overexpressing, and Vvrr1 knockout + pykF-RNAi strains. The contribution of ndk, eno, sdhB, glpF and cysH to the biofilm formation (I) and the adhesion ability (J) were compared after gene silencing (H). Data are presented as mean ± SD. Three independent biological replicates were performed per group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

Pykf was a target gene of Vvrr1 regulating virulence

The DNA sequence for the Vvrr1 in V. alginolyticus was BLAST against the genome of other Vibrios on the basis of the latest version of the BLASTN, indicating that the Vvrr1 of V. alginolyticus shared 95%, 92%, and 92% identities with the homologous genes present in V. parahaemolyticus, V. antiquarius, and V. diabolicus, respectively. Furthermore, the interaction sequence against pykF in Vvrr1 was identified by IntaRNA and highlighted as having ∼100% sequence conservation across several Vibrios (Figure 5). Thus, the alignment of DNA sequences for pykF in V. alginolyticus, V. parahaemolyticus, V. antiquarius, and V. diabolicus was also carried out, implying that the pykF of V. alginolyticus shared 95%, 99%, and 99% identities with the homologous genes present in V. parahaemolyticus, V. antiquarius, and V. diabolicus, respectively. Meanwhile, the interaction sequence against Vvrr1 in pykF was also identified by IntaRNA and highlighted as having ∼100% sequence conservation across several Vibrios (Figure 5). The deep conservation of these two interaction sequences throughout Vibrios indicated their biological importance.
Figure 5.

Alignment of Vvrr1 and pykF identified in V. alginolyticus, V. parahaemolyticus, V. antiquarius, and V. diabolicus. The putative Vvrr1-pykF interaction sequence is indicated by the red arrow. The numbering of residues follows the sequence.

Alignment of Vvrr1 and pykF identified in V. alginolyticus, V. parahaemolyticus, V. antiquarius, and V. diabolicus. The putative Vvrr1-pykF interaction sequence is indicated by the red arrow. The numbering of residues follows the sequence. To validate the results of the aforementioned analysis and further document the specific Vvrr1–pykF mRNA interactions, GFP reporter gene analysis was performed in E. coli. E. coli containing pykF-GFP plasmids displayed green fluorescence under the fluorescence microscope, while the fluorescence intensities were significantly repressed by vectors containing the entire ncRNA sequences of Vvrr1 (Figure 6A). The results of the flow cytometric analysis also showed that Vvrr1 was sufficient for the repression of pykF by 10.82-fold (Figure 6B). However, the absence of Vvrr1–pykF interaction sites caused a reduction of GFP translation repression in both genetic backgrounds, suggesting that both interaction sequences were involved in Vvrr1–pykF binding (Figure 6). These results reinforced the prediction of IntaRNA and indicated the interactions between the ncRNA Vvrr1 and the mRNA of pykF. Therefore, it was hypothesized that the regulatory mechanism of Vvrr1 against pykF played an important role in the pathogenicity of V. alginolyticus.
Figure 6.

GFP reporter gene analysis revealed interactions between the ncRNA Vvrr1 and the mRNA of pykF gene. (A) Fluorescence intensities of E. coli containing pykF-GFP, pykF-GFP + nontarget shRNA, pykF-GFP + Vvrr1, pykF-GFP + Vvrr1ΔIS, and pykFΔIS-GFP + Vvrr1 under fluorescence microscope. GFP fluorescence was excited at 460 nm, and light emission was recorded using a 510 nm filter. (B) Flow cytometric analysis of target regulation. Fold repression is depicted on the y-axis. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3, **P < 0.01).

GFP reporter gene analysis revealed interactions between the ncRNA Vvrr1 and the mRNA of pykF gene. (A) Fluorescence intensities of E. coli containing pykF-GFP, pykF-GFP + nontarget shRNA, pykF-GFP + Vvrr1, pykF-GFP + Vvrr1ΔIS, and pykFΔIS-GFP + Vvrr1 under fluorescence microscope. GFP fluorescence was excited at 460 nm, and light emission was recorded using a 510 nm filter. (B) Flow cytometric analysis of target regulation. Fold repression is depicted on the y-axis. Data are presented as the mean ± SD (n = 3, **P < 0.01).

Discussion

The pathogenic process of V. alginolyticus includes adhesion, invasion, proliferation in vivo, and production of toxins. The pathologic effect is caused by cell and tissue damage induced by V. alginolyticus during its invasion and proliferation, as well as its metabolites (toxins) interfering with and destroying the local metabolism or function of the partial or whole host body [49]. The adhesion to the host body or cell is a prerequisite for the pathogenic bacteria to cause disease. Therefore, effective blocking of the adhesion of pathogenic bacteria to the host is of great significance in the prevention and treatment of diseases [50]. Previous studies involved the transcriptomic analysis of the ncRNA of V. alginolyticus strains under different stress conditions [51], revealing that the expression level of Vvrr1, an un-reported ncRNA, significantly increased in the strains of V. alginolyticus with impaired adhesion ability under the stress of Cu2+, Pb2+, Hg2+, and low pH. This indicated that Vvrr1 might be closely related to the adhesion ability of V. alginolyticus. In the present study, the proteomics analysis showed that when Vvrr1 was overexpressed, only significantly downregulated proteins existed in the biological adhesion GO enrichment, and their enrichment rate was the highest in all biological processes. At the same time, the KEGG pathway analysis of downregulated proteins showed that the protein enrichment rate of the TCA cycle and sulfur metabolism was the highest and the most significant, while the TCA cycle was confirmed to have an important regulatory effect on the adhesion process of V. alginolyticus [52]. These findings also indicated that Vvrr1 participated in the adhesion of V. alginolyticus. When Vvrr1 was overexpressed, the adhesion ability of V. alginolyticus significantly decreased, further indicating that Vvrr1 played a crucial role in the adhesion process. IntaRNA was used to predict the target genes of Vvrr1 by sequence analysis in the present study. Vvrr1 had multiple potential target genes closely related to bacterial virulence. It negatively correlated with the expression levels of these genes, such as pykF. Further, pykF, a key metabolic gene that encodes pyruvate kinases associated with carbon metabolism, is widely present in many intracellular bacteria. In recent years, the relationship between the carbon metabolism of intracellular bacteria and their virulence has become a research hotspot. Many intracellular bacteria, such as Listeria monocytogenes, Shigella, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, can adapt to the harsh living environment by regulating their own metabolism. In addition, Brucella strains lacking the pyruvate kinase gene pykF were found to have significantly reduced viability in host macrophages [53-55]. Meanwhile, the pykF-centric network diagram in the present study demonstrated that ndk was a manipulation of bacterial virulence and adaptive responses of the pleiotropic effector. Studies have revealed that ndk secreted from bacteria is important in modulating virulence-associated phenotypes, including QS regulation, type III secretion system activation, and virulence factor production (Figure 7). Moreover, after infection, ndk released from bacteria are involved in regulating host defense activities, such as cell apoptosis, phagocytosis, and inflammatory responses [56]. In addition, ndk is a critical novel host-responsive gene required for coordinating P. aeruginosa virulence upon acute infection, and its mutant exhibits enhanced cytotoxicity and host pathogenicity by increasing the level of T3SS proteins [57]. The interaction network diagram of Vvrr1 with its potential target genes shows some of the target genes with their virulence function. For example, relA has been proved to enhance the adhesion of E. coli to host cells [58]. katG can increase the survival and escape rates of Aeromonas hydrophila in fish macrophages [59]. These observations indicated that Vvrr1 might play an important role in the virulence gene regulatory network of V. alginolyticus.
Figure 7.

Working model of Vvrr1-pykF axis control of metabolic and virulence related processes in V. alginolyticus. Various stresses including Cu2+, Pb2+, Hg2+ and low pH modulate the level of Vvrr1. Vvrr1 binds to pykF mRNA and reduce its translation, thus affecting the expression of ndk, eno, sdhB, glpF and cysH. Arrowed and bar-ended lines indicate activation and repression, respectively.

Working model of Vvrr1-pykF axis control of metabolic and virulence related processes in V. alginolyticus. Various stresses including Cu2+, Pb2+, Hg2+ and low pH modulate the level of Vvrr1. Vvrr1 binds to pykF mRNA and reduce its translation, thus affecting the expression of ndk, eno, sdhB, glpF and cysH. Arrowed and bar-ended lines indicate activation and repression, respectively. ncRNA can block protein translation by binding to the mRNA of the target gene, or regulate the gene after transcription by promoting the degradation of mRNA, both leading to the decrease in the protein expression level encoded by the target gene. pykF, the hub gene of the interaction network diagram of differentially expressed proteins, was chosen for further research. The results of this study strongly suggested that Vvrr1 negatively affected pykF translation through direct binding to pykF mRNA at 1320–1350 bp located on mRNA. However, a reduction of pykF mRNA was also observed after Vvrr1 overexpression. Thus, Vvrr1 might also promote the degradation of pykF mRNA. However, further investigation is still required to confirm this. In the present study, Vvrr1 and pykF were found to be negatively and positively related to adhesion, biofilm production, and virulence in V. alginolyticus, while pykF was negatively regulated by Vvrr1. Meanwhile, the pykF-centric network diagram in the present study showed that multiple downstream virulence genes, including ndk, eno, sdhB, glpF, and cysH, were positively regulated by pykF. Moreover, eno, sdhB, glpF, and cysH were involved in the regulation of adhesion ability and biofilm formation, while ndk was involved only in the regulation of adhesion ability, consistent with reports on other bacterial strains. For example, ndk (nucleoside-diphosphate kinase encoding gene) and eno (enolase encoding gene) have been implicated in the adhesion of Burkholderia pseudomallei [60]. The Lactobacillus plantarum Eno is involved in biofilm development [61]. sdhB (succinate dehydrogenase iron-sulfur subunit encoding gene) is found to be necessary for the adhesion and biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus [62]. glpF (glycerol uptake facilitator protein-encoding gene) participates in L. monocytogenes biofilm formation at the air–liquid interface [63] and adhesion to Caco-2 cells [64]. cysH (phosphoadenosine phosphosulfate reductase encoding gene) is related to the regulation of adhesion and biofilm formation in E. coli [65]. These findings confirmed that the Vvrr1–pykF axis was associated with the regulation of V. alginolyticus pathogenicity (Figure 7). Interestingly, according to the KEGG database, pykF, ndk, eno, sdhB, glpF, and cysH were reported to be closely related to the microbial metabolism in diverse environments, indicating the importance of the Vvrr1–pykF axis in the adaptation and response to environmental stresses (Figure 7). This study was novel in revealing the molecular mechanism of Vvrr1 involvement in the virulence regulation of V. alginolyticus by exploring the mechanism of the Vvrr1 regulation of target genes. The findings might help understand the virulence regulation network of V. alginolyticus and provide the reference value for the functional identification of V. alginolyticus and other bacterial ncRNA.
  62 in total

Review 1.  Micros for microbes: non-coding regulatory RNAs in bacteria.

Authors:  Susan Gottesman
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  VqsA, a Novel LysR-Type Transcriptional Regulator, Coordinates Quorum Sensing (QS) and Is Controlled by QS To Regulate Virulence in the Pathogen Vibrio alginolyticus.

Authors:  Xiating Gao; Xuetong Wang; Qiaoqiao Mao; Rongjing Xu; Xiaohui Zhou; Yue Ma; Qin Liu; Yuanxing Zhang; Qiyao Wang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Vibrio parahaemolyticus infections in the United States, 1973-1998.

Authors:  N A Daniels; L MacKinnon; R Bishop; S Altekruse; B Ray; R M Hammond; S Thompson; S Wilson; N H Bean; P M Griffin; L Slutsker
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 4.  Cholera and other vibrioses in the United States.

Authors:  J G Morris; R E Black
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-02-07       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Vibrio gastroenteritis in the US Gulf of Mexico region: the role of raw oysters.

Authors:  S F Altekruse; R D Bishop; L M Baldy; S G Thompson; S A Wilson; B J Ray; P M Griffin
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.451

6.  Interplay of the modified nucleotide phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate (PAPS) with global regulatory proteins in Escherichia coli: modulation of cyclic AMP (cAMP)-dependent gene expression and interaction with the HupA regulatory protein.

Authors:  Francesca Longo; Sara Motta; Pierluigi Mauri; Paolo Landini; Elio Rossi
Journal:  Chem Biol Interact       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 5.192

7.  Quorum sensing negatively regulates hemolysin transcriptionally and posttranslationally in Vibrio cholerae.

Authors:  Amy M Tsou; Jun Zhu
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2009-10-26       Impact factor: 3.441

8.  Involvement of LuxS in the regulation of motility and flagella biogenesis in Vibrio alginolyticus.

Authors:  Yang Tian; Qiyao Wang; Qin Liu; Yue Ma; Xiaodan Cao; Lingyu Guan; Yuanxing Zhang
Journal:  Biosci Biotechnol Biochem       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 2.043

9.  Serine/threonine kinase PpkA coordinates the interplay between T6SS2 activation and quorum sensing in the marine pathogen Vibrio alginolyticus.

Authors:  Zhen Yang; Xiaohui Zhou; Yue Ma; Mian Zhou; Matthew K Waldor; Yuanxing Zhang; Qiyao Wang
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 5.491

10.  Contributions of the oligopeptide permeases in multistep of Vibrio alginolyticus pathogenesis.

Authors:  Wenjia Liu; Lixing Huang; Yongquan Su; Yingxue Qin; Lingmin Zhao; Qingpi Yan
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  7 in total

1.  Type III Secretion 1 Effector Gene Diversity Among Vibrio Isolates From Coastal Areas in China.

Authors:  Chao Wu; Zhe Zhao; Yupeng Liu; Xinyuan Zhu; Min Liu; Peng Luo; Yan Shi
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 5.293

2.  Dual RNA-seq provides novel insight into the roles of dksA from Pseudomonas plecoglossicida in pathogen-host interactions with large yellow croakers ( Larimichthys crocea).

Authors:  Lu-Ying Wang; Zi-Xu Liu; Ling-Min Zhao; Li-Xing Huang; Ying-Xue Qin; Yong-Quan Su; Wei-Qiang Zheng; Fan Wang; Qing-Pi Yan
Journal:  Zool Res       Date:  2020-07-18

3.  Bacterioplankton response to nitrogen and dissolved organic matter produced from salmon mucus.

Authors:  Verónica Molina; Camila Fernández
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  In vivo test of Vibrio alginolyticus and Vibrio harveyi infection in the humpback grouper (Cromileptes altivelis) from East Java Indonesia.

Authors:  Uun Yanuhar; Hendra Nurcahyo; Luluk Widiyanti; Nur Sakinah Junirahma; Nico Rahman Caesar; Sukoso Sukoso
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2022-05-23

5.  The temperature-dependent expression of type II secretion system controls extracellular product secretion and virulence in mesophilic Aeromonas salmonida SRW-OG1.

Authors:  Xin Yi; Yunong Chen; Hongyan Cai; Jiajia Wang; Youyu Zhang; ZhiQin Zhu; Mao Lin; Yingxue Qin; XingLong Jiang; Xiaojin Xu
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 6.073

6.  Characterizing the Effect of the Lysine Deacetylation Modification on Enzyme Activity of Pyruvate Kinase I and Pathogenicity of Vibrio alginolyticus.

Authors:  Zhou Xu; Linjing Wang; Xudong Wang; Mingyue Wan; Mei Tang; Yu Ding
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-06

7.  Comparative transcriptome and phenotype analysis revealed the role and mechanism of ompR in the virulence of fish pathogenic Aeromonas hydrophila.

Authors:  Mengmeng Zhang; Jianping Kang; Bin Wu; Yingxue Qin; Lixing Huang; Lingmin Zhao; Leilei Mao; Suyun Wang; Qingpi Yan
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 3.139

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.