| Literature DB >> 31711032 |
Renzo Manara1, Sara Ponticorvo1, Immacolata Tartaglione2, Gianluca Femina1, Andrea Elefante3, Camilla Russo3, Pasquale Alessandro Carafa4, Mario Cirillo5, Maddalena Casale2, Angela Ciancio6, Rosanna Di Concilio7, Elisa De Michele8, Nikolaus Weiskopf9, Francesco Di Salle10, Silverio Perrotta11, Fabrizio Esposito10.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Multisystem iron poisoning is a major concern for long-term beta-thalassemia management. Quantitative MRI-based techniques routinely show iron overload in heart, liver, endocrine glands and kidneys. However, data on the brain are conflicting and monitoring of brain iron content is still matter of debate.Entities:
Keywords: Beta-thalassemia; Blood transfusion; Brain MRI; Iron; Multi-parametric mapping
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31711032 PMCID: PMC6849415 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102058
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Subjects baseline characteristics.
| All patients | TDT | NTDT | HC | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # of patients | 70 | 47 | 23 | 57 | ||
| Females, n (%) | 43 (61) | 30 (63) | 13 (56) | 37(65) | ||
| Age (years), mean±SD median (range) IQR | 34.4 ± 10.8 34 (16–65) 17.5 | 36.9 ± 10.3 39 (16–65) 17 | 29.2 ± 11.7 26 (16–52) 14.5 | 39.9 ± 10.8 32 (17–66) 14.2 | ||
| Age at first transfusion (months), mean±SD median (range) IQR | 29±42.5 24 (2–276) 30 | 29±42.5 24 (2–276) 30 | n.a. | n.a. | ||
| Splenectomy, n (%) | 46 (66) | 37 (79) | 9 (39) | 0(0) | ||
| Hb (g/dl), mean±SD median (range)IQR | 9.3 ± 1.0 9.3 (7.4–10.8) 1.4 | 9.3 ± 0.9 9.3 (7.4–10.8) 1.2 | 9.3 ± 0.9 9.8 (8.1–10.8) 1.4 | n.a. | ||
| Transfusion Index (ml/kg/year) median (range) IQR | 149.9 ± 55.1 143 (60–288) 67 | 149.9 ± 55.1 143 (60–288) 67 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Ferritin (ng/ml), mean±SD median (range) IQR | 729.1 ± 628.0 500 (75–2314) 614 | 882.8 ± 669.0 714.5 (140–2314) 637 | 364.1 ± 290.8 280 (75–1000) 294.5 | n.a. | ||
| HCV+, n (%) | 7 (10.0) | 7 (14.9) | 0 | 0 | ||
| LIC (mg/gdw), mean±SD median (range) IQR | 4.9 ± 3.7 3.7 (1–20.5) 5.1 | 4.4 ± 3.1 3.5 (1–13.7) 3.7 | 6.7 ± 5.4 6.35 (1–20.5) 7.65 | n.a. | ||
| Heart T2*(msec), mean±SD median (range) IQR | 32.5 ± 15.7 31.9 (13.1–65.9) 14.2 | 31.9 ± 11.3 32 (13.1–65.9) 12.4 | 34.6 ± 20.3 29.5 (15.9–55.3) 18.5 | n.a. | ||
| ICT | DFO | ever, n (%) ongoing, n (%) dose, mg/kg | 51 (72.8) 13 (18.6) 33.5 ± 6.7 | 46 (97.9) 11 (23) 35.9 ± 3.1 | 5 (21.7) 2 (8.7) 20.0 ± 1.6 | 0 |
| DFP | ever, n (%) ongoing, n (%) dose, mg/kg | 20 (28.6) 3 (4.3) 72.9 ± 1.8 | 19 (40.4) 2 (4.2) 73.2 ± 2.5 | 1 (4.3) 1 (4.3) 72.4 | 0 | |
| DFX | ever, n (%) ongoing, n (%) dose, mg/kg | 53 (75.7) 35 (50.0) 21.5 ± 10.7 | 45 (95.7) 32 (71.1) 27.6 ± 8.0 | 8 (34.8) 3 (13) 10.1 ± 0.6 | 0 | |
Table 1. Characterization of the patients and controls enrolled. LIC: liver iron concentration; ICT: iron chelation therapy; DFO: deferoxamine; DFP: deferiprone; DFX: deferasirox dispersible tablets; IQR: interquartile range.
Mean ± standard deviation of R2* values [s−1] across subjects.
| HC [s−1] | NTDT [s−1] | TDT [s−1] | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Left CN | 16.86 | ± 1.58 | 16.59 | ± 1.43 | 16.10 | ± 1.68 |
| Right CN | 16.31 | ± 1.79 | 15.92 | ± 1.31 | 15.59 | ± 1.66 |
| Left Put | 15.10 | ± 1.84 | 15.86 | ± 1.85 | 15.49 | ± 2.60 |
| Right Put | 15.08 | ± 2.05 | 15.49 | ± 1.73 | 15.33 | ± 2.84 |
| Left GP | 19.74 | ± 2.30 | 20.57 | ± 2.53 | 20.73 | ± 3.29 |
| Right GP | 21.06 | ± 2.48 | 21.89 | ±2.25 | 21.97 | ± 3.59 |
| Left Thal | 9.82 | ± 0.69 | 9.91 | ± 0.79 | 10.16 | ± 1.05 |
| Right Thal | 10.21 | ± 0.75 | 10.31 | ± 0.85 | 10.63 | ± 1.15 |
| RN | 20.16 | ± 2.21 | 21.29 | ± 2.25 | 21.21 | ± 2.78 |
Table 2. Mean ± standard deviation of R2* values [s
Slopes of linear correlation of R2* vs age.
| HC | NTDT | TDT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Left CN | 0.100 | 0.102 | 0.084 |
| Right CN | 0.046 | 0.139 | 0.161 |
| Left Put | 0.178 | 0.234 | 0.138 |
| Right Put | 0.005 | 0.048 | 0.031 |
| Left GP | 0.116 | 0.209 | 0.172 |
| Right GP | 0.088 | 0.099 | 0.077 |
| Left Thal | 0.074 | 0.141 | 0.157 |
| Right Thal | 0.182 | 0.228 | 0.146 |
| RN | 0.009 | 0.048 | 0.030 |
Table 3. Slopes of the linear fitting of the R2* mean regional values on subject's age, separately for each group. Subcortical region of interest considered: Caudate Nucleus (CN), Putamen (Put), Globus Pallidum (GP), Thalamus (Thal) and Red Nucleus (RN).
Fig. 1(a)Whole-brain correlation maps (p<0.05, family-wise error correction for multiple comparisons) of R2* vs. age in healthy subjects (left) and beta-thalassemia patients (right). (b) Scatter plot and linear trends of R2* values vs. age in the significant clusters of the bilateral putamina.
Fig. 2T-maps of group comparison displayed on a single-subject normalized magnetization transfer (MT) map. (a) TDT and NTDT patients vs. HC. (b) TDT patients vs. HC. All maps are thresholded at p<0.05 after family-wise error correction for multiple comparisons.
Statistically significant clusters characterization.
| Cluster name | Peak coordinate (MNI) | Cluster size (voxels) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TDT and NTDT vs HC | R-LUSC | 12, −43, −45 | 100 |
| L-LUSC | −15, −39, −48 | 90 | |
| R-HIPP | 25, −14, −15 | 182 | |
| L-HIPP | −26, −16, −15 | 75 | |
| TDT vs HC | R-LUSC | 12, −43, −46 | 246 |
| L-LUSC | −15, −38, −47 | 266 | |
| R-HIPP | 29, −20, −12 | 738 | |
| L-HIPP | −30, −39, 0 | 703 | |
| R-THAL | 2, −29, 8 | 83 | |
| L-THAL | −8, −20, 18 | 64 |
Table 4. Characterization of the clusters where the R2* was found different between groups (p<0.05 fwe corrected). No suprathreshold clusters were found comparing NTDT vs HC and comparing TDT vs NTDT. The clusters were named for an easier localization: R-LUSC and L-LUSC are the clusters around the right and left Luschka foramina, R-HIPP and L-HIPP are the right and left clusters around the anterior hippocampal formations and R-THAL and L-THAL are the clusters on the dorsal thalamic surfaces.
Fig. 3(a) Whole-brain correlation maps (p<0.001, uncorrected) of R2* vs. serum ferritin in both groups of beta-thalassemia patients. (b) Scatter plot, linear trends and R2 values of R2* values vs. serum ferritin in the bilateral significant clusters.
'A priori' region of interest-based analysis.
| Year | Patients | Age | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Metafratzi et al. | 2001 | 41 TDT | 24 (8.5–44) | 58 | n.e. | n.e. | n.e. | |||||
| Akhlaghpoor et al. | 2012 | 53 TM | 25.9 ± 1.0 | 40 | n.e. | n.e. | n.e. | |||||
| Qiu et al. | 2014 | 31 TM | 25.3 ± 5.9 | 33 | n.e. | n.e. | ||||||
| Hasiloglu et al. | 2017 | 18 TDT (17 TM) | 19 (7–39)* | 18 | n.e. | n.e. | n.e. | n.e. | n.e. | n.e. | n.e. | |
| Present study | 2018 | 47 TDT 23 NTDT | 36.9 ± 10.3 29.2 ± 11.7 | 56 | n.e. | n.e.- |
Table 5:'A priori' region of interest-based analysis of increased iron content in the brain parenchyma: literature and present study findings. *median-age and range; TDT=transfusion dependent thalassemia; TM=thalassemia major; NTDT=not transfusion dependent thalassemia; HC=healthy controls; Put=putamen; GP=globus pallidum; CN=caudate nucleus; MC=motor cortex; TC=temporal cortex; Thal=thalamus; RN=red nucleus; ChP=choroid plexuses; +=increased iron content; -=no iron accumulation in patients; n.e.=not evaluated.