| Literature DB >> 35858838 |
Suzan Omar Mousa1, Asmaa Hosni Abd El-Hafez2, Mostafa Ahmed Abu El-Ela3, Mohamed Aboul-Fotouh Mourad4, Rasha Nady Saleh5, Samira Zain Sayed2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: RANK/RANKL/OPG axis was implicated in many pathological conditions. The study aimed to assess the relationship between the studied RANK, RANKL, and OPG polymorphisms and alleles and cognitive impairment in children with transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT).Entities:
Keywords: Cognition; IQ; RANK/RANKL/OPG; Transfusion-dependent thalassemia
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35858838 PMCID: PMC9297631 DOI: 10.1186/s12887-022-03479-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Pediatr ISSN: 1471-2431 Impact factor: 2.567
Fig. 1Frequency of different total, verbal, and performance IQ categories among studied TDT children
Fig. 2Frequency of the studied polymorphisms genotypes among TDT children
The relation of the studied polymorphisms and alleles of the RANK/RANKL/OPG axis with the total IQ of TDT children
| Gene | TDT total IQ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mean ± SD | p | unstandardized coefficient β (95% CI) | p | ||
| | GG | 76.5 ± 11 | 0.2 | 0.84 (−4.33–6) | 0.75 |
| GC | 80 ± 11 | ||||
| CC | 80 ± 13 | ||||
| | C | 80 ± 11.8 | 0.84 | −0.5 (−4.8–3.7) | 0.8 |
| G | 79.5 ± 10.5 | ||||
| | CC | 79.5 ± 3 | −2.4 (− 6.14–1.4) | 0.2 | |
| CT | 85.4 ± 13 | ||||
| TT | 76.8 ± 11.5 | ||||
| | C | 82 ± 9 | 0.14 | −3.2 (−7.4–1.1) | 0.14 |
| T | 78.8 ± 12 | ||||
| | AA | 82.5 ± 17 | 0.6 | 0.55 (−4.5–5.6) | 0.8 |
| AG | 77 ± 12 | ||||
| GG | 80.4 ± 11 | ||||
| | A | 79.3 ± 13.5 | 0.8 | 0.74 (−5–6.5) | 0.8 |
| G | 80 ± 11 | ||||
| | CC | 81 ± 11 | 0.3 | −2.8 (−7.3–2) | 0.2 |
| C DEL | 80 ± 12.5 | ||||
| DEL DEL | 73 ± 5.5 | ||||
| | C | 80.7 ± 11.3 | 0.21 | −3 (−7.6–1.7) | 0.2 |
| Del | 77.7 ± 11 | ||||
| | CC | 87 ± 19 | 0.1 | - 0.2 (−4.8–4.45) | 0.95 |
| CT | 76 ± 12 | ||||
| TT | 80.4 ± 9.5 | ||||
| | C | 80 ± 15 | 0.94 | −0.18 (−5.05–4.7) | 0.94 |
| T | 80 ± 11.3 | ||||
| | GG | 73 ± 5 | 0.2 | 4.15 (−0.14–8.44) | 0.1 |
| GA | 78 ± 10 | ||||
| AA | 82 ± 12 | ||||
| | A | 81 ± 11.8 | −5.09 (−9.8 – −3.37) | ||
| G | 76 ± 8.5 | ||||
* Statistical significance p < 0.05
The relation of the studied polymorphisms and alleles of the RANK/RANKL/OPG axis with the verbal IQ of TDT children
| Gene | TDT verbal IQ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mean ± SD | p | unstandardized coefficient β (95% CI) | p | ||
| | GG | 80.5 ± 12 | 0.7 | −0 .95-(−7.3–5.4) | 0.8 |
| GC | 85 ± 14 | ||||
| CC | 82 ± 14 | ||||
| | C | 83.4 ± 14 | 0.8 | 0.7(−4.55–5.9) | 0.8 |
| G | 84 ± 13.5 | ||||
| | CC | 83 ± 7 | −3.7- (−8.3–0.8) | 0.1 | |
| CT | 92 ± 16 | ||||
| TT | 79 ± 13 | ||||
| | C | 87 ± 12 | 0.1 | −4.98-(−10.2–0.2) | 0.1 |
| T | 82 ± 14.4 | ||||
| | AA | 86.5 ± 17 | 0.8 | 0.08 (− 6.1–6.3) | 1 |
| AG | 81 ± 12 | ||||
| GG | 84 ± 14.3 | ||||
| | A | 83.5 ± 13.4 | 1 | 0.13 (−6.9–7.2) | 1 |
| G | 83.6 ± 14 | ||||
| | CC | 83.5 ± 12 | 0.3 | −1.7 (−7.3–4) | 0.55 |
| C DEL | 85 ± 17 | ||||
| DEL DEL | 75 ± 11 | ||||
| | C | 84 ± 13 | 0.53 | −1.8 (− 7.55–3.9) | 0.5 |
| Del | 82.3 ± 15.6 | ||||
| | CC | 92 ± 26.3 | 0.3 | −0.735 (−6.4–5) | 0.8 |
| CT | 80 ± 15 | ||||
| TT | 84 ± 11 | ||||
| | C | 84.3 ± 19.4 | 0.8 | −0.85 (−7.55–3.9) | 0.8 |
| T | 83.4 ± 11.7 | ||||
| | GG | 74.5 ± 4.5 | 6.5 (1.4–11.6) | ||
| GA | 80 ± 11 | ||||
| AA | 87 ± 15 | ||||
| | A | 85.5 ± 14.5 | −7.97 (−6.8–5.) | 0.1 | |
| G | 77.6 ± 9 | ||||
* Statistical significance p < 0.05
The relation of the studied polymorphisms and alleles of the RANK/RANKL/OPG axis with the performance IQ of TDT children
| Gene | TDT performance IQ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mean ± SD | p | unstandardized coefficient β (95% CI) | p | ||
| | GG | 75 ± 9 | 0.65 | 12 (−2.2–6.25) | 0.35 |
| GC | 77 ± 9 | ||||
| CC | 79 ± 10.4 | ||||
| | C | 78 ± 9.6 | 0.43 | −1.4 -(−4.95–2) | 0.4 |
| G | 76.8 ± 8.7 | ||||
| | CC | 77.5 ± 3.5 | 0.3 | −1.2- (−4.3–1.9) | 0.43 |
| CT | 80.4 ± 10. | ||||
| TT | 76 ± 10 | ||||
| | C | 78.7 ± 7 | 0.4 | −1.6-(−5.15–1.9) | 0.4 |
| T | 77 ± 10 | ||||
| | AA | 80 ± 15 | 0. 6 | 0.3 (−3.9–4.4) | 0.9 |
| AG | 75 ± 10 | ||||
| GG | 78 ± 9 | ||||
| | A | 77 ± 12 | 0.9 | 0.4 (−4.35–5.1) | 0.9 |
| G | 77.7 ± 8.7 | ||||
| | CC | 79 ± 10 | 0.35 | −2.7- (−6.4–1) | 0.15 |
| C DEL | 76.3 ± 8 | ||||
| DEL DEL | 74 ± 5 | ||||
| | C | 78.4 ± 9.8 | 0.13 | −2.9-(−6.75–0.9) | 0.13 |
| Del | 75.5 ± 7 | ||||
| | CC | 83 ± 12 | 0.12 | 0.45 (−3.4–4.2) | 0.84 |
| CT | 74.3 ± 10 | ||||
| TT | 79 ± 8 | ||||
| | C | 77 ± 11 | 0.8 | 0.45 (−3.5–4.4) | 0.8 |
| T | 77.8 ± 8.7 | ||||
| | GG | 70 ± 8 | 0.12 | 3.2 (−0.3–6.7) | 0.14 |
| GA | 78 ± 10 | ||||
| AA | 79 ± 9 | ||||
| | A | 78.6 ± 9 | −3.9- (−7.8--0.06-) | ||
| G | 74.7 ± 9.5 | ||||
* Statistical significance p < 0.05
Correlations of factors affecting total, verbal, and performance IQ in TDT children
| Total IQ | Verbal IQ | Performance IQ | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| r | p | r | p | r | p | |
| −0.33 | 0.01* | −0.33 | 0.009* | – | – | |
| – | – | 0.38 | 0.01* | – | – | |
| 0.22 | 0.79 | – | – | 0.25 | 0.05 | |
| −0.54 | 0.001* | − 0.63 | 0.001* | − 0.32 | 0.01* | |
| 0.08 | 0.5 | 0.21 | 0.09 | 0.1 | 0.4 | |
| 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.2 | 0.06 | 0.17 | 0.17 | |
| 0.113 | 0.3 | 0.12 | 0.3 | −0.09 | 0.4 | |
| 0.09 | 0.4 | 0.09 | 0.4 | 0.04 | 0.7 | |
| −0.32 | 0.01* | −0.33 | 0.009* | −0.28 | 0.02* | |
| −0.019 | 0.8 | 0.13 | 0.3 | 0.02 | 0.8 | |
Hb hemoglobin, BMI body mass index, LIC liver iron concentration.
* Statistical significance p < 0.05
Multiple linear regression analysis of factors correlating with total and verbal IQ
| Total IQ | Verbal IQ | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standardized coefficient (𝛃) | t | p | Standardized coefficient (𝛃) | t | p | |
| − 0.17 | −1.67 | 0.009* | − 0.21 | − 2.2 | 0.03* | |
| – | – | 0.1 | 0.39 | 0.06 | ||
| −0.51 | −4.83 | 0.001* | −0.58 | −5.7 | 0.001* | |
| −0.23 | −2.23 | 0.03* | −0.22 | − 2.2 | 0.02* | |
R2 = 0.4 (F = 11.8; df = 3) | R2 = 0.5 (F = 13.9; df = 4) | |||||
* Statistical significance p < 0.05