OBJECTIVE: The association between iron and neurocognition remains underexplored in adolescents, and the neurocognitive effects of low and high iron levels have yet to be established. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships of low and high iron levels with neurocognitive domains in early adolescents. METHOD: The sample comprised 428 adolescents (12.0 ± 0.4 years) from Jintan, China. Serum iron concentrations were analyzed from venous blood samples and classified into low, normal, and high levels according to the clinical reference range 75-175 μg/dl. Neurocognition was measured by the Penn Computerized Neurocognitive Battery and Wechsler Intelligence Scale. Generalized linear regression was used to analyze relationships. RESULTS: Prevalence rates of iron deficiency, normal iron, and high iron were 13.8%, 76.4%, and 9.8%, respectively. Compared with normal levels, iron deficiency was associated with slower performance in tasks that measured abstraction and mental flexibility (β = 107.5, p = .03) and spatial processing ability (β = 917.2, p = .04). High serum iron was associated with less accuracy in the spatial processing ability task (β = -2.2, p = .03) and a longer reaction time in the task assessing abstraction and mental flexibility (β = 702.8, p = .046) compared to normal levels. CONCLUSION: Both iron deficiency and high iron levels contribute to reduced neurocognitive performance in a domain-specific manner in early adolescents. The dual burden of iron under- and overnutrition should be incorporated into future interventions for improving brain development and cognitive function in adolescents, especially in a Chinese context.
OBJECTIVE: The association between iron and neurocognition remains underexplored in adolescents, and the neurocognitive effects of low and high iron levels have yet to be established. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationships of low and high iron levels with neurocognitive domains in early adolescents. METHOD: The sample comprised 428 adolescents (12.0 ± 0.4 years) from Jintan, China. Serum iron concentrations were analyzed from venous blood samples and classified into low, normal, and high levels according to the clinical reference range 75-175 μg/dl. Neurocognition was measured by the Penn Computerized Neurocognitive Battery and Wechsler Intelligence Scale. Generalized linear regression was used to analyze relationships. RESULTS: Prevalence rates of iron deficiency, normal iron, and high iron were 13.8%, 76.4%, and 9.8%, respectively. Compared with normal levels, iron deficiency was associated with slower performance in tasks that measured abstraction and mental flexibility (β = 107.5, p = .03) and spatial processing ability (β = 917.2, p = .04). High serum iron was associated with less accuracy in the spatial processing ability task (β = -2.2, p = .03) and a longer reaction time in the task assessing abstraction and mental flexibility (β = 702.8, p = .046) compared to normal levels. CONCLUSION: Both iron deficiency and high iron levels contribute to reduced neurocognitive performance in a domain-specific manner in early adolescents. The dual burden of iron under- and overnutrition should be incorporated into future interventions for improving brain development and cognitive function in adolescents, especially in a Chinese context.
Entities:
Keywords:
adolescent; high iron exposure; iron deficiency; micronutrient; neurocognitive function
Authors: Jianghong Liu; Linda A McCauley; Yang Zhao; Hanzhe Zhang; Jennifer Pinto-Martin Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2009-05-11 Impact factor: 7.196
Authors: Martin Falkingham; Asmaa Abdelhamid; Peter Curtis; Susan Fairweather-Tait; Louise Dye; Lee Hooper Journal: Nutr J Date: 2010-01-25 Impact factor: 3.271
Authors: Samantha Schildroth; Katarzyna Kordas; Julia Anglen Bauer; Robert O Wright; Birgit Claus Henn Journal: Curr Environ Health Rep Date: 2022-08-23
Authors: J Cobb Scott; Amelia E Van Pelt; Allison M Port; Lucky Njokweni; Ruben C Gur; Tyler M Moore; Onkemetse Phoi; Ontibile Tshume; Mogomotsi Matshaba; Kosha Ruparel; Jennifer Chapman; Elizabeth D Lowenthal Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-08-26 Impact factor: 2.692