Literature DB >> 31705301

[Physical audiological principles of implantable hearing systems : About power transmission, coupling and power output].

Torsten Rahne1.   

Abstract

Implantable hearing systems work because mechanical vibration energy is introduced into the hearing system. The performance of the hearing system is thus essentially determined by physical parameters. Together with the tone and speech audiogram the indications for deciding on a system are based on the efficacy of the respective system and the patient's wishes. Hearing-assisted patients should have a dynamic range of 30-35 dB to adequately understand speech. This should be guaranteed with the respective system also in the medium to long term. In addition, sufficient cochlear reserve performance for implantable hearing systems is critical for success. The expected and achieved audiological success can be the effective gain as a difference of aided hearing threshold to bone conduction threshold and should be preferred to the unreflecting use of gain or functional gain. With good differential diagnostic indications and the inclusion of conventional hearing aids and cochlear implants, optimal hearing solutions can be found for almost all patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone conduction; Cochlear implants; Hearing loss; Hearing tests; Implantable hearing systems

Year:  2021        PMID: 31705301     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-019-00776-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Device-based treatment of mixed hearing loss: An audiological comparison of current hearing systems].

Authors:  T Rahne; S K Plontke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Measurement of implant stability and auditory pure-tone thresholds of Baha patients comparing osteosysthesis and osseointegrated systems.

Authors:  Torsten Rahne; Gerrit Götze; M Katharina Pein
Journal:  Z Med Phys       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 4.820

Review 3.  Acoustic and physiologic aspects of bone conduction hearing.

Authors:  Stefan Stenfelt
Journal:  Adv Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-08

4.  Performance evaluation of a novel piezoelectric subcutaneous bone conduction device.

Authors:  Ivo Dobrev; Jae Hoon Sim; Flurin Pfiffner; Alexander M Huber; Christof Röösli
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-06       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Device optimised chirp stimulus for ABR measurements with an active middle ear implant.

Authors:  Mario Cebulla; Ute Geiger; Rudolf Hagen; Andreas Radeloff
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.117

6.  Amplification options for patients with mixed hearing loss.

Authors:  Joost W Zwartenkot; Ad F M Snik; Emmanuel A M Mylanus; Jef J S Mulder
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Force threshold for hearing by direct bone conduction.

Authors:  P Carlsson; B Håkansson; A Ringdahl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Optimal Retention Force of Audio Processor Magnets.

Authors:  Luise Wagner; Elisabeth Hönig; Laura Fröhlich; Stefan Plontke; Torsten Rahne
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Influence of Floating-Mass Transducer Coupling Efficiency for Active Middle-Ear Implants on Speech Recognition.

Authors:  Alexander Müller; Parwis Mir-Salim; Nina Zellhuber; Ralf Helbig; Marc Bloching; Tobias Schmidt; Sven Koscielny; Oliver C Dziemba; Stefan K Plontke; Torsten Rahne
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  [Relative value of BAHA testing for the postoperative audiological outcome].

Authors:  I Gründer; R O Seidl; A Ernst; I Todt
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.284

  10 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Audiological target parameters in clinical studies with implantable hearing systems].

Authors:  Hannes Maier
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  The Hannover Coupler V2: Audiological outcomes of a round window coupler for the Vibrant Soundbridge.

Authors:  Nicole Knölke; Dawid Murawski; Nina Wardenga; Susan Busch; Hannes Maier; Thomas Lenarz
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-05-28

Review 3.  [Hearing rehabilitation with the Vibrant Soundbridge in patients with congenital middle ear malformation].

Authors:  J M Hempel; A Epp; V Volgger
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Intraoperative quantification of floating mass transducer coupling quality in active middle ear implants: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Laura Fröhlich; Torsten Rahne; Stefan K Plontke; Tobias Oberhoffner; Rüdiger Dahl; Robert Mlynski; Oliver Dziemba; Aristotelis Aristeidou; Maria Gadyuchko; Sven Koscielny; Sebastian Hoth; Miriam H Kropp; Parwis Mir-Salim; Alexander Müller
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.503

5.  Active Middle Ear Implant Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Intensity-Latency Characteristics.

Authors:  Laura Fröhlich; Alexander Müller; Miriam H Kropp; Parwis Mir-Salim; Oliver Dziemba; Tobias Oberhoffner; Stefan K Plontke; Torsten Rahne
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.003

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.