J M Hempel1, A Epp2, V Volgger3. 1. Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, LMU Klinikum Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. John-Martin.Hempel@med.uni-muenchen.de. 2. Kinderklinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Deutschland. 3. Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, LMU Klinikum Großhadern, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Congenital aural atresia, which is usually unilateral, causes hearing loss and aesthetic impairment. Besides tympanoplasty with/without canalplasty and bone conduction devices, active middle ear implants are also available for functional rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: This article aims to present a contemporary review on the treatment possibilities for middle ear malformations, with a focus on audiological rehabilitation with the Vibrant Soundbridge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A selective literature search for treatment possibilities was performed in PubMed up to October 2020, and personal clinical experiences are reported. RESULTS: The Vibrant Soundbridge, which is approved for children ≥ 5 years, is suitable for treatment of middle ear malformations with a Jahrsdoerfer score ≥ 5. Although implantation of a Vibrant Soundbridge is surgically more demanding than implantation of a bone conduction device, the method is safe, delivers good auditory results (superior to bone conduction devices in terms of speech understanding and spatial hearing), does not involve intensive postsurgical care, and rarely requires revision surgery. The Vibrant Soundbridge can be coupled to (remnants of) the ossicular chain or the round window. CONCLUSION: The Vibrant Soundbridge is an appropriate treatment method in patients with middle ear malformations who have suitable anatomical preconditions.
BACKGROUND: Congenital aural atresia, which is usually unilateral, causes hearing loss and aesthetic impairment. Besides tympanoplasty with/without canalplasty and bone conduction devices, active middle ear implants are also available for functional rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: This article aims to present a contemporary review on the treatment possibilities for middle ear malformations, with a focus on audiological rehabilitation with the Vibrant Soundbridge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A selective literature search for treatment possibilities was performed in PubMed up to October 2020, and personal clinical experiences are reported. RESULTS: The Vibrant Soundbridge, which is approved for children ≥ 5 years, is suitable for treatment of middle ear malformations with a Jahrsdoerfer score ≥ 5. Although implantation of a Vibrant Soundbridge is surgically more demanding than implantation of a bone conduction device, the method is safe, delivers good auditory results (superior to bone conduction devices in terms of speech understanding and spatial hearing), does not involve intensive postsurgical care, and rarely requires revision surgery. The Vibrant Soundbridge can be coupled to (remnants of) the ossicular chain or the round window. CONCLUSION: The Vibrant Soundbridge is an appropriate treatment method in patients with middle ear malformations who have suitable anatomical preconditions.
Authors: Chagit Klieger-Grossmann; David Chitayat; Sharon Lavign; Kelly Kao; Facundo Garcia-Bournissen; Dee Quinn; Vicky Luo; Mathew Sermer; Sara Riordan; Carl Laskin; Ilan Matok; Rafael Gorodischer; Christina Chambers; Amalia Levi; Gideon Koren Journal: J Obstet Gynaecol Can Date: 2010-08