Literature DB >> 32880736

Intraoperative quantification of floating mass transducer coupling quality in active middle ear implants: a multicenter study.

Laura Fröhlich1, Torsten Rahne2, Stefan K Plontke2, Tobias Oberhoffner3, Rüdiger Dahl3, Robert Mlynski3, Oliver Dziemba4, Aristotelis Aristeidou4, Maria Gadyuchko5,6, Sven Koscielny5, Sebastian Hoth7, Miriam H Kropp8, Parwis Mir-Salim8, Alexander Müller8.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Evaluating the effectiveness of intraoperative auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to stimulation by the Vibrant Soundbridge (VSB) active middle ear implant for quantifying the implant's floating mass transducer (FMT) coupling quality.
METHODS: In a diagnostic multicentric study, patients (> 18 years) who received a VSB with different coupling modalities were included. Pre- and postoperative bone conduction thresholds, intraoperative VSB-evoked ABR thresholds (VSB-ABR) using a modified audio processor programmed to preoperative bone conduction thresholds, postoperative vibrogram thresholds, and postoperative VSB-ABR thresholds were measured. Coupling quality was calculated from the difference between the pure tone average at 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz (3PTA) vibrogram and postoperative 3PTA bone conduction thresholds.
RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (13 males, 10 females, mean age 56.6 (± 12.5) years) were included in the study. Intraoperative VSB-ABR response thresholds could be obtained in all except one patient where the threshold was > 30 dB nHL. Postoperatively, an insufficient coupling of 36.7 dB was confirmed in this patient. In a Bland-Altman analysis of the intraoperative VSB-ABRs and coupling quality, the limits of agreement exceeded ± 10 dB, i.e., the maximum allowed difference considered as not clinically important but the variation was within the general precision of auditory brainstem responses to predict behavioral thresholds. Five outliers were identified. In two patients, the postoperative VSB-ABR thresholds were in agreement with the coupling quality, indicating a change of coupling before the postoperative testing.
CONCLUSION: The response thresholds recorded in this set-up have the potential to predict the VSB coupling quality and optimize postoperative audiological results.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active middle ear implant; Coupling quality; Floating mass transducer; Intraoperative; Objective measures

Year:  2020        PMID: 32880736     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06313-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  23 in total

Review 1.  [Device-based treatment of mixed hearing loss: An audiological comparison of current hearing systems].

Authors:  T Rahne; S K Plontke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  The Vibrant Soundbridge® middle ear implant: A historical overview.

Authors:  S Labassi; M Beliaeff; V Péan; P Van de Heyning
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2017-08-08

3.  Guideline "Implantable hearing aids"-short version : German S2k guideline of the Working Group of German-Speaking Audiologists, Neurootologists and Otologists (ADANO), of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery (DGHNO) in collaboration with the German Society of Audiology (DGA), the German Society of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology (DGPP), and patient representatives.

Authors:  D Beutner; W Delb; H Frenzel; U Hoppe; K B Hüttenbrink; R Mlynski; A Limberger; R Schönweiler; B Schwab; I Todt; M Walger; T Wesarg; T Zahnert; R Zeh
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 4.  [Physical audiological principles of implantable hearing systems : About power transmission, coupling and power output].

Authors:  Torsten Rahne
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  Oval and round window vibroplasty: a comparison of hearing results, risks and failures.

Authors:  Andrea Canale; Federico Dagna; Claudia Cassandro; Pamela Giordano; Federico Caranzano; Michelangelo Lacilla; Roberto Albera
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Vibrant SoundBridge combined with auricle reconstruction for bilateral congenital aural atresia.

Authors:  Danni Wang; Shouqin Zhao; Qingguo Zhang; Yi Li; Xiaobo Ma; Ran Ren
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 1.675

7.  Treatment of mixed hearing losses via implantation of a vibratory transducer on the round window.

Authors:  Vittorio Colletti; Sigfrid D Soli; Marco Carner; L Colletti
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.117

8.  Importance of adhesiolysis in revision surgery for vibrant soundbridge device failures at the short incus process.

Authors:  Yoon Ah Park; Tae Hoon Kong; Jin Soon Chang; Young Joon Seo
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 2.503

9.  Reinforced active middle ear implant fixation in incus vibroplasty.

Authors:  Robert Mlynski; Ernst Dalhoff; Andreas Heyd; Daniela Wildenstein; Rudolf Hagen; Anthony W Gummer; Sebastian P Schraven
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Standardized Active Middle-Ear Implant Coupling to the Short Incus Process.

Authors:  Robert Mlynski; Ernst Dalhoff; Andreas Heyd; Daniela Wildenstein; Kristen Rak; Andreas Radeloff; Rudolf Hagen; Anthony W Gummer; Sebastian P Schraven
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.311

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Laser Doppler vibrometric measurements on human temporal bones].

Authors:  S P Schraven; D Dohr; N M Weiss; R Mlynski; E Dalhoff
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Influence of Hearing Rehabilitation With Active Middle Ear and Bone Conduction Implants on Postural Control.

Authors:  Ingmar Seiwerth; Antonia Brylok; René Schwesig; Torsten Rahne; Laura Fröhlich; Andreas Lauenroth; Timothy E Hullar; Stefan K Plontke
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.086

3.  Active Middle Ear Implant Evoked Auditory Brainstem Response Intensity-Latency Characteristics.

Authors:  Laura Fröhlich; Alexander Müller; Miriam H Kropp; Parwis Mir-Salim; Oliver Dziemba; Tobias Oberhoffner; Stefan K Plontke; Torsten Rahne
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Clinical feasibility of a novel test setup for objective measurements using the VIBRANT SOUNDBRIDGE.

Authors:  Georg Mathias Sprinzl; Philipp Schörg; Stefan Edlinger; Marlene Ploder; Astrid Magele
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.