Literature DB >> 17879076

[Relative value of BAHA testing for the postoperative audiological outcome].

I Gründer1, R O Seidl, A Ernst, I Todt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bone-anchored hearing aids provide a therapy option for patients with conductive and mixed hearing loss, with the possibility of audiological rehabilitation. Test rod and tension headband offer the patient a preoperative impression of their postoperative hearing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the tools available for preoperative assessment of candidates for bone-anchored hearing aids and to ascertain predictive audiometric values.
METHODS: Following implantation of a BAHA Compact system, sound and speech audiograms were performed in each of 16 patients with the bone-anchored BAHA device and with test rod and tension headband.
RESULTS: Both with the BAHA and with the test devices, closure of the air-bone gap occurred and resulted in a clear improvement in hearing threshold and speech perception. The threshold increase with the BAHA was 9 dB greater on average (mean) than that measured with the test rod and the tension headband. Examinaation of speech perception indicated a mean advantage of 14-20% for the anchored BAHA system over the tension headband in monosyllabic testing.
CONCLUSION: Preoperative testing before providing a BAHA system is a good way of predicting what level of hearing and speech perception can be expected after implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 17879076     DOI: 10.1007/s00106-007-1608-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HNO        ISSN: 0017-6192            Impact factor:   1.284


  11 in total

1.  Sensitivity to bone-conducted sound: excitation of the mastoid vs the teeth.

Authors:  S P Stenfelt; B E Håkansson
Journal:  Scand Audiol       Date:  1999

2.  [BAHA (bone-anchored hearing aid) in bilateral external ear dysplasia and congenital ear atresia].

Authors:  Susanne Klaiber; H Weerda
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.284

3.  [Bone anchored hearing aids always bilateral!].

Authors:  P A Federspil; P K Plinkert
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Hearing with the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA, HC 200) compared to a conventional bone-conduction hearing aid.

Authors:  C W Cremers; F M Snik; A J Beynon
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  1992-06

5.  The bone-anchored hearing aid. Design principles, indications, and long-term clinical results.

Authors:  A Tjellström; B Håkansson
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 6.  [Active electronic hearing implants for middle and inner ear hearing loss--a new era in ear surgery. II: Current state of developments].

Authors:  H P Zenner; H Leysieffer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Short- and long-term results with implantable transcutaneous and percutaneous bone-conduction devices.

Authors:  A F Snik; W A Dreschler; R A Tange; C W Cremers
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1998-03

8.  Patients' opinions of bone-anchored vs conventional hearing aids.

Authors:  E A Mylanus; A F Snik; C W Cremers
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1995-04

9.  Acceleration levels at hearing threshold with direct bone conduction versus conventional bone conduction.

Authors:  B Håkansson; A Tjellström; U Rosenhall
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1985 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  [Bilateral bone anchored hearing aid management of children with external ear dysplasia and/or ear canal atresia].

Authors:  N Missfeldt; A Baun; P Zwirner
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 1.284

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  [Device-based treatment of mixed hearing loss: An audiological comparison of current hearing systems].

Authors:  T Rahne; S K Plontke
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  [An alternative to percutaneous bone-anchored hearing systems].

Authors:  S Arndt; T Wesarg
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 3.  [Physical audiological principles of implantable hearing systems : About power transmission, coupling and power output].

Authors:  Torsten Rahne
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Cochlear implant treatment of patients with single-sided deafness or asymmetric hearing loss.

Authors:  S Arndt; R Laszig; A Aschendorff; F Hassepass; R Beck; T Wesarg
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [Cochlear implant treatment of patients with single-sided deafness or asymmetric hearing loss. German version].

Authors:  S Arndt; R Laszig; A Aschendorff; F Hassepass; R Beck; T Wesarg
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.284

6.  The bonebridge as a transcutaneous bone conduction hearing system: preliminary surgical and audiological results in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Frederike Hassepass; Stefan Bulla; Antje Aschendorff; Wolfgang Maier; Louisa Traser; Christian Steinmetz; Thomas Wesarg; Susan Arndt
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Objective estimation of frequency-specific pure-tone hearing thresholds following bone-conduction hearing aid stimulation.

Authors:  Torsten Rahne; Thomas Ehelebe
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-04-10

8.  Bone-anchored hearing system, contralateral routing of signals hearing aid or cochlear implant: what is best in single-sided deafness?

Authors:  Till F Jakob; Iva Speck; Ann-Kathrin Rauch; Frederike Hassepass; Manuel C Ketterer; Rainer Beck; Antje Aschendorff; Thomas Wesarg; Susan Arndt
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.503

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.