Literature DB >> 31702429

Failed Suppression of Salient Stimuli Precedes Behavioral Errors.

Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld1, Niko A Busch2, Anna Schubö3.   

Abstract

Our visual system is constantly confronted with more information than it can process. To deal with the limited capacity, attention allows us to enhance relevant information and suppress irrelevant information. Particularly, the suppression of salient irrelevant stimuli has shown to be important as it prevents attention to be captured and thus attentional resources to be wasted. This study aimed at directly connecting failures to suppress distraction with a neural marker of suppression, the distractor positivity (Pd). We measured participants' EEG signal while they performed a visual search task in which they had to report a digit inside a shape target while ignoring distractors, one of which could be a salient color singleton. Reports of target digits served as a behavioral index of enhancement, and reports of color distractor digits served as a behavioral index of failed suppression, each measured against reports of neutral distractor digits serving as a baseline. Participants reported the target identity more often than any distractor identity. The singleton identity was reported least often, suggesting suppression of the singleton below baseline. Suppression of salient stimuli was absent in the beginning and then increased throughout the experiment. When the singleton identity was reported, the Pd was observed in a later time window, suggesting that behavioral errors were preceded by failed suppression. Our results provide evidence for the signal suppression hypothesis that states salient items have to be actively suppressed to avoid attentional capture. Our results also provide direct evidence that the Pd is reflecting such active suppression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31702429     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  11 in total

1.  Spatially Guided Distractor Suppression during Visual Search.

Authors:  Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Marina Weinberger; Edward Awh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Can salient stimuli really be suppressed?

Authors:  Seah Chang; Howard E Egeth
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  The guidance of attention by templates for rejection during visual search.

Authors:  Nick Berggren; Martin Eimer
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  On preventing attention capture: Is singleton suppression actually singleton suppression?

Authors:  Mei-Ching Lien; Eric Ruthruff; Christopher Hauck
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-09-24

5.  Do salient abrupt onsets trigger suppression?

Authors:  Emily Burgess; Christopher Hauck; Emile De Pooter; Eric Ruthruff; Mei-Ching Lien
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 2.157

6.  Does attentional suppression occur at the level of perception or decision-making? Evidence from Gaspelin et al.'s (2015) probe letter task.

Authors:  Dirk Kerzel; Olivier Renaud
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-09-12

7.  Testing the underlying processes leading to learned distractor rejection: Learned oculomotor avoidance.

Authors:  Brad T Stilwell; Shaun P Vecera
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.157

8.  Progress Toward Resolving the Attentional Capture Debate.

Authors:  Steven J Luck; Nicholas Gaspelin; Charles L Folk; Roger W Remington; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2020-12-01

9.  Controlling the Flow of Distracting Information in Working Memory.

Authors:  Nicole Hakim; Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld; Edward Awh; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Across-trial spatial suppression in visual search.

Authors:  Lishuang Wang; Benchi Wang; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.