Literature DB >> 31697410

Substrate binding to Src: A new perspective on tyrosine kinase substrate recognition from NMR and molecular dynamics.

Mehul K Joshi1, Robert A Burton1,2, Heng Wu1, Andrew M Lipchik1, Barbara P Craddock3, Huaping Mo4, Laurie L Parker1, W Todd Miller3,5, Carol Beth Post1.   

Abstract

Most signal transduction pathways in humans are regulated by protein kinases through phosphorylation of their protein substrates. Typical eukaryotic protein kinases are of two major types: those that phosphorylate-specific sequences containing tyrosine (~90 kinases) and those that phosphorylate either serine or threonine (~395 kinases). The highly conserved catalytic domain of protein kinases comprises a smaller N lobe and a larger C lobe separated by a cleft region lined by the activation loop. Prior studies find that protein tyrosine kinases recognize peptide substrates by binding the polypeptide chain along the C-lobe on one side of the activation loop, while serine/threonine kinases bind their substrates in the cleft and on the side of the activation loop opposite to that of the tyrosine kinases. Substrate binding structural studies have been limited to four families of the tyrosine kinase group, and did not include Src tyrosine kinases. We examined peptide-substrate binding to Src using paramagnetic-relaxation-enhancement NMR combined with molecular dynamics simulations. The results suggest Src tyrosine kinase can bind substrate positioning residues C-terminal to the phosphoacceptor residue in an orientation similar to serine/threonine kinases, and unlike other tyrosine kinases. Mutagenesis corroborates this new perspective on tyrosine kinase substrate recognition. Rather than an evolutionary split between tyrosine and serine/threonine kinases, a change in substrate recognition may have occurred within the TK group of the human kinome. Protein tyrosine kinases have long been therapeutic targets, but many marketed drugs have deleterious off-target effects. More accurate knowledge of substrate interactions of tyrosine kinases has the potential for improving drug selectivity.
© 2019 The Protein Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chemical shift perturbation; clustering conformational ensembles; ensemble averaging NMR restraints; kinase-substrate molecular recognition; multiple ligand-binding modes; paramagnetic relaxation enhancement; substrate recognition

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31697410      PMCID: PMC6954736          DOI: 10.1002/pro.3777

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  39 in total

Review 1.  Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Ubersax; James E Ferrell
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 2.  Targeting cancer with small molecule kinase inhibitors.

Authors:  Jianming Zhang; Priscilla L Yang; Nathanael S Gray
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  A molecular brake in the kinase hinge region regulates the activity of receptor tyrosine kinases.

Authors:  Huaibin Chen; Jinghong Ma; Wanqing Li; Anna V Eliseenkova; Chongfeng Xu; Thomas A Neubert; W Todd Miller; Moosa Mohammadi
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 17.970

4.  αC helix as a switch in the conformational transition of Src/CDK-like kinase domains.

Authors:  He Huang; Ruijun Zhao; Bradley M Dickson; Robert D Skeel; Carol Beth Post
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2012-04-05       Impact factor: 2.991

Review 5.  How do protein kinases discriminate between serine/threonine and tyrosine? Structural insights from the insulin receptor protein-tyrosine kinase.

Authors:  S S Taylor; E Radzio-Andzelm; T Hunter
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Catalytic specificity of protein-tyrosine kinases is critical for selective signalling.

Authors:  Z Songyang; K L Carraway; M J Eck; S C Harrison; R A Feldman; M Mohammadi; J Schlessinger; S R Hubbard; D P Smith; C Eng
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-02-09       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The structural basis for specificity of substrate and recruitment peptides for cyclin-dependent kinases.

Authors:  N R Brown; M E Noble; J A Endicott; L N Johnson
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 28.824

8.  Optimized bacterial expression and purification of the c-Src catalytic domain for solution NMR studies.

Authors:  Andrea Piserchio; Ranajeet Ghose; David Cowburn
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Crystal structure of the catalytic subunit of cyclic adenosine monophosphate-dependent protein kinase.

Authors:  D R Knighton; J H Zheng; L F Ten Eyck; V A Ashford; N H Xuong; S S Taylor; J M Sowadski
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 10.  The kinome 'at large' in cancer.

Authors:  Emmy D G Fleuren; Luxi Zhang; Jianmin Wu; Roger J Daly
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 60.716

View more
  3 in total

1.  All-atom adaptively biased path optimization of Src kinase conformational inactivation: Switched electrostatic network in the concerted motion of αC helix and the activation loop.

Authors:  Heng Wu; He Huang; Carol Beth Post
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2020-11-07       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Substrate binding to Src: A new perspective on tyrosine kinase substrate recognition from NMR and molecular dynamics.

Authors:  Mehul K Joshi; Robert A Burton; Heng Wu; Andrew M Lipchik; Barbara P Craddock; Huaping Mo; Laurie L Parker; W Todd Miller; Carol Beth Post
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Temperature sensitivities of metazoan and pre-metazoan Src kinases.

Authors:  W Todd Miller
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2020-06-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.