| Literature DB >> 31687510 |
Fendi AlShaarani1, Rami M Alaisami2, Loai Aljerf3, Issam A Jamous2, Kanaan Elias4, Anas Jaber3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Retention is an essential factor in the sustainability of the prosthesis, especially for short abutment. Despite, the availability of several auxiliary applications, achieving a clinically good retention for cast crowns in prepared short teeth remains a major challenge for the practicing dentist.Entities:
Keywords: Abutment; Biomedical engineering; Biotechnology; Cast crown; Cement key; Dental materials; Dentistry; Frustum; Groove; Metal protrusion; Occupational health; Oral medicine; Prosthetic dentistry; Pull off test; Quality of life; Retention; Short crown; Tooth preparation
Year: 2019 PMID: 31687510 PMCID: PMC6820267 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02674
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1Schematic illustration of the Dies. A: Group (Gr. 1), CG; B: Gr. 2, SG; C: Gr. 3, F; D: Gr. 4, FM.
Fig. 2An abutment and a casting from Gr. 2, SG. A: The copper abutment with the prepared setting grove, and B: The casting.
Fig. 3The preparation of the frustum. A: The prepared frustum on the abutment, and B: Frustum preparation.
Fig. 4The Duralay pin and the protrusion inside the casting. A: The Duraly pin, and B: The two metal protrusions inside the casting from (Gr. 4; FM).
Results of pull-off test (Newton).
| Abutment number | Group FM | Group F | Group SG | Group CG |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 824.04 | 578.79 | 407.115 | 451.26 |
| 2 | 804.42 | 593.505 | 304.11 | 515.025 |
| 3 | 946.665 | 598.41 | 510.12 | 568.98 |
| 4 | 809.325 | 559.17 | 446.355 | 372.78 |
| 5 | 907.425 | 549.36 | 505.215 | 529.74 |
| 6 | 789.705 | 573.885 | 568.98 | 593.505 |
| 7 | 961.38 | 622.935 | 500.31 | 304.11 |
| 8 | 1142.865 | 618.03 | 465.975 | 534.645 |
| 9 | 1167.39 | 671.985 | 667.08 | 382.59 |
| 10 | 735.75 | 529.74 | 426.735 | 309.015 |
| 11 | 1177.2 | 686.7 | 362.97 | 608.22 |
| 12 | 770.085 | 588.6 | 367.875 | 323.73 |
Descriptive statistics of data (Tensile strength (TS), Newtown).
| Gr. | Number of copper stents/plates | Arithmetic mean (μ) ± Standard deviation (std. dev.) | Standard error (SE) | Lower bound | Upper bound |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Setting grooves (SG) | 12 | 461.07 ± 98.37 | 28.40 | 304.11 | 667.08 |
| Frustum (F) | 12 | 597.59 ± 47.96 | 13.84 | 529.74 | 686–.7 |
| Frustum with metal protrusion (FM) | 12 | 919.69 ± 161.91 | 46.74 | 735.75 | 1177.2 |
| Control group (CG) | 12 | 457.80 ± 114.05 | 32.92 | 304.11 | 608.22 |
Results of ANOVA analysis.
| Studied variable | Time | Sum of squares (SS) | Degrees of freedom | Var. (mean square discrepancy) | Calculated F-value | Significance level | Significance variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TS | Between groups | 1696818.88 | 3 | 565606.29 | 44.191 | 0.0000 | + |
| Within groups | 563157.62 | 44 | 12799.04 | ||||
| Total | 2259976.49 | 47 |
Significant difference: +.
Results of Bonferroni test (TS, Newtown).
| Set (I) | Set (II) | Mean difference (I-II) | SE | Significance level | Significance of variance |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Setting grooves (SG) | Frustum (F) | -136.52 | 46.19 | 0.030 | + |
| F | -458.62 | 46.19 | 0.000 | + | |
| CG | 3.27 | 4.19 | 1.000 | - | |
| Frustum (FM) | F | 12–322.10 | 46.19 | 0.000 | + |
| CG | 139.79 | 46.19 | 0.025 | + | |
| Control group (CG) | CG | 461.89 | 46.19 | 0.000 | + |
Significance difference: +.
Significance difference: -.
Fig. 5The cement inside the castings in Gr. 1, CG.
Fig. 6The retained cement inside the frustum (Gr. F).
Fig. 7An abutment and a casting from Gr. 4 (FM) after pull-off test.