Literature DB >> 22133393

An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.

Israel Lewinstein1, Liat Block, Zachi Lehr, Zeev Ormianer, Shlomo Matalon.   

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Crowns cemented on short implant abutments may have insufficient retention.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of circumferential grooves on the retention of cemented cast copings on implant abutments.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty similarly-shaped implant abutments were divided into 4 groups (n=15): without grooves, with 1 groove, with 2 grooves, and with 3 grooves. Fifteen identical NiCr cast copings were prepared to fit all 60 abutments. The castings were cemented to each group of abutments with a noneugenol provisional cement (Tempbond NE) and a zinc phosphate cement (Harvard). After thermal cycling and storage for 6 days in a water bath, retention tests were conducted with a tensile testing machine (Instron) (5 mm/min) and retentive forces were recorded. Data were subjected to 1 way-ANOVA, Tukey's (HSD) test, and repeated measures ANOVA (α=.05).
RESULTS: For the noneugenol temporary cement, group retention values were increased according to the number of grooves (P<.001). For the zinc phosphate cement, the first groove increased the retention by approximately 60% (P<.001). The retentive values were higher for the zinc phosphate cement than the provisional cement. The influence of the grooves depended on the type of cement used (P<.001). Cement remnants were found primarily on the castings for provisional cement and for the plain abutments cemented with zinc phosphate cement. Remnants were found primarily on the abutments for the grooved abutments cemented with zinc phosphate cement.
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of circumferential grooves to implant abutments increased the retention of cement-retained castings. For zinc phosphate cement, 1 groove was as effective as several, whereas for the provisional cement, the retention increased gradually with additional grooves.
Copyright © 2011 The Editorial Council of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22133393     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60149-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthet Dent        ISSN: 0022-3913            Impact factor:   3.426


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of the effect of implant abutment surface modifications on retention of implant-supported restoration with a polymer based cement.

Authors:  Nabaprakash Sahu; Namratha Lakshmi; N S Azhagarasan; Yoshaskam Agnihotri; Manoj Rajan; Ramasubramanian Hariharan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-01-12

2.  Effect of Surface Modifications on the Retention of Cement-retained Implant Crowns under Fatigue Loads: An In vitro Study.

Authors:  R Ajay; K Suma; Seyed Asharaf Ali; Jambai Sampath Kumar Sivakumar; V Rakshagan; V Devaki; K Divya
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2017-11

3.  Zinc phosphate as a definitive cement for implant-supported crowns and fixed dentures.

Authors:  Dennis Flanagan
Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent       Date:  2017-11-03

4.  Management of short clinical crowns by utilizing horizontal groove retentive technique in crown/tooth or both with different luting cements - An analysis on extracted teeth.

Authors:  J Haritha; M Reddi Narasimha Rao; B Indira Padmaja; N Raja Reddy; N Suresh Babu; K V Guru Charan Karthik
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-03-26

5.  Effect of Implant Abutment Acid Etching on the Retention of Crowns Luted with Different Cements: An In Vitro Comparative Evaluation.

Authors:  R Ajay; V Rakshagan; M Kamatchi; A SelvaBalaji; Jambai Sampath Kumar Sivakumar; M Senthil Kumar
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2019-05

6.  An auxiliary factor for increasing the retention of short abutments.

Authors:  Fendi AlShaarani; Rami M Alaisami; Loai Aljerf; Issam A Jamous; Kanaan Elias; Anas Jaber
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2019-10-21

7.  Retention of different temporary cements tested on zirconia crowns and titanium abutments in vitro.

Authors:  Felix Dähne; Heike Meißner; Klaus Böning; Christin Arnold; Ralf Gutwald; Elisabeth Prause
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2021-07-20

8.  Evaluation of removal forces of implant-supported zirconia copings depending on abutment geometry, luting agent and cleaning method during re-cementation.

Authors:  Matthias Rödiger; Sven Rinke; Fenja Ehret-Kleinau; Franziska Pohlmeyer; Katharina Lange; Ralf Bürgers; Nikolaus Gersdorff
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 1.904

9.  Retention Strength after Compressive Cyclic Loading of Five Luting Agents Used in Implant-Supported Prostheses.

Authors:  Angel Alvarez-Arenal; Ignacio Gonzalez-Gonzalez; Hector deLlanos-Lanchares; Aritza Brizuela-Velasco; Javier Pinés-Hueso; Joseba Ellakuria-Echebarria
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-10-16       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Effect of surface treatments on the retention of implant-supported cement-retained bridge with short abutments: An in vitro comparative evaluation.

Authors:  Monica Shrivastav
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.