Literature DB >> 2638624

Visual evoked potential abnormalities in chiasmal lesions.

J Brecelj1, M Denislic, M Skrbec.   

Abstract

Pattern reversal visual evoked potentials (VEPs) were recorded from 38 patients with lesions affecting the chiasmal area. Lesions were confirmed by computer tomography and all patients had ophthalmologic examination. VEPs to full-field stimulation (0-16 degrees r) were compared with those obtained with half-field stimulation. Changes in VEPs were seen as a nonrecordable or attenuated P 100 (abnormal amplitude ratio) or as a prolonged P 100. Analysis of the records showed that temporal half-field stimulation (crossed fibers) yielded a higher rate of abnormal responses (80%) than full-field stimulation (66%). The most frequent abnormality in the former stimulation was a nonrecordable P 100 (42%) and in the latter an abnormal amplitude ratio of P 100 (41%). When the uncrossed fibers were stimulated with the nasal half-field, abnormalities were detected in 32% of responses. Lesions in the region of the sella turcica were also associated with a high incidence of delayed responses (39% of patients when crossed fibers were stimulated). However, the magnitude of the delays was smaller (1-32 ms) compared with delays in patients with demyelinating disease. Findings of this study show that half-field stimulation assists in the interpretation of responses to full-field stimulation. In addition, half-field stimulation can reveal abnormalities that are not detected with full-field stimulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2638624     DOI: 10.1007/bf00155032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  10 in total

1.  The pattern-evoked potential in compression of the anterior visual pathways.

Authors:  A M Halliday; E Halliday; A Kriss; W I McDonald; J Mushin
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Multi-channel visual evoked potentials in early compressive lesions of the chiasm.

Authors:  J G Flanagan; G F Harding
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  VER analysis of the chiasmal syndrome.

Authors:  A Müller-Jensen; S Zschocke; F Dannheim
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 4.849

4.  Hemi-field pattern reversal visual evoked potentials. II. Lesions of the chiasm and posterior visual pathways.

Authors:  I C Haimovic; T A Pedley
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-08

5.  Visual recovery after treatment for pituitary adenoma.

Authors:  G Lennerstrand
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1983-12

6.  The effects of chiasmal compression on the pattern visual evoked potential.

Authors:  G E Holder
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-08

7.  [Value of visual evoked potentials (VEP) in compression of the anterior visual pathway, especially in the area of the chiasm].

Authors:  T Staudacher; R Reuther; M Rittmann; H Krastel
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 1.214

8.  Evoked potentials in the evaluation of visual field defects due to chiasmal or retrochiasmal lesions.

Authors:  C G Maitland; M J Aminoff; C Kennard; W F Hoyt
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Checkerboard visual evoked response in evaluation and management of pituitary tumors.

Authors:  O S Gott; M H Weiss; M Apuzzo; J P Van Der Meulen
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 4.654

10.  Visual evoked potential diagnosis of field defects in patients with chiasmatic and retrochiasmatic lesions.

Authors:  M Onofrj; I Bodis-Wollner; L Mylin
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 10.154

  10 in total
  4 in total

1.  VEP asymmetry with ophthalmological and MRI findings in two achiasmatic children.

Authors:  Jelka Brecelj; Branka Stirn-Kranjc; Nuska Pecaric-Meglic; Miha Skrbec
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 2.  Visual electrophysiology in the clinical evaluation of optic neuritis, chiasmal tumours, achiasmia, and ocular albinism: an overview.

Authors:  Jelka Brecelj
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  Visual function assessed by visually evoked potentials in optic pathway low-grade gliomas with and without neurofibromatosis type 1.

Authors:  Patrícia de Freitas Dotto; Adriana Berezovsky; Andrea Maria Cappellano; Nasjla Saba da Silva; Paula Yuri Sacai; Frederico Adolfo B Silva; Arthur Gustavo Fernandes; Daniel Martins Rocha; Solange Rios Salomão
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 4.  What can visual electrophysiology tell about possible visual-field defects in paediatric patients.

Authors:  Siân E Handley; Maja Šuštar; Manca Tekavčič Pompe
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.775

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.