Literature DB >> 31680469

Rapid detection of biofilm by wound blotting following sharp debridement of chronic pressure ulcers predicts wound healing: A preliminary study.

Gojiro Nakagami1,2, Gregory Schultz3, Aya Kitamura1, Takeo Minematsu2,4, Kaname Akamata5, Hiraku Suga5, Masakazu Kurita6, Chieko Hayashi7, Hiromi Sanada1,2.   

Abstract

For optimal wound bed preparation, wound debridement is essential to eliminate bacterial biofilms. However, it is challenging for clinicians to determine whether the biofilm is completely removed. A newly developed biofilm detection method based on wound blotting technology may be useful. Thus, we aimed to investigate the effect of biofilm elimination on wound area decrease in pressure ulcers, as confirmed using the wound blotting method. In this retrospective observational study, we enrolled patients with pressure ulcers who underwent sharp debridement with pre- and post-debridement wound blotting. Biofilm was detected on the nitrocellulose membrane using ruthenium red or alcian blue staining. Patients were included if the test was positive for biofilm before wound debridement. Percent decrease in wound area after 1 week was calculated as an outcome measure. We classified the wounds into a biofilm-eliminated group and a biofilm-remaining group based on the post-debridement wound blotting result. Sixteen wound blotting samples from nine pressure ulcers were collected. The percent decrease in wound area was significantly higher in the biofilm-eliminated group (median: 14.4%, interquartile range: 4.6%-20.1%) than in the biofilm-remaining group (median: -14.5%, interquartile range: -25.3%-9.6%; P = .040). The presence of remaining biofilms was an independent predictor for reduced percent decrease in wound area (coefficient = -22.84, P = .040). Biofilm-based wound care guided by wound blotting is a promising measure to help clinicians eliminate bacterial bioburden more effectively for wound area reduction.
© 2019 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  debridement; point-of-care; wound blotting

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31680469      PMCID: PMC7948602          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13256

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  18 in total

Review 1.  Infections.

Authors:  Brendan Healy; Andrew Freedman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-04-08

Review 2.  The prevalence of biofilms in chronic wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data.

Authors:  M Malone; T Bjarnsholt; A J McBain; G A James; P Stoodley; D Leaper; M Tachi; G Schultz; T Swanson; R D Wolcott
Journal:  J Wound Care       Date:  2017-01-02       Impact factor: 2.072

3.  Biofilm-based wound care: the importance of debridement in biofilm treatment strategies.

Authors:  Matthew Malone; Terry Swanson
Journal:  Br J Community Nurs       Date:  2017-06-02

4.  Predictive validity of weekly monitoring of wound status using DESIGN-R score change for pressure ulcer healing: a multicenter prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Shinji Iizaka; Hiromi Sanada; Yuko Matsui; Masutaka Furue; Takao Tachibana; Takeo Nakayama; Junko Sugama; Katsunori Furuta; Masahiro Tachi; Keiko Tokunaga; Yoshiki Miyachi
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 5.  The role of biofilms: are we hitting the right target?

Authors:  Randall Wolcott; Scot Dowd
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.730

6.  Contribution of quorum sensing to the virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in pressure ulcer infection in rats.

Authors:  Gojiro Nakagami; Tomohiro Morohoshi; Tsukasa Ikeda; Yasunori Ohta; Hiroshi Sagara; Lijuan Huang; Takashi Nagase; Junko Sugama; Hiromi Sanada
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.617

7.  Biofilm detection by wound blotting can predict slough development in pressure ulcers: A prospective observational study.

Authors:  Gojiro Nakagami; Gregory Schultz; Daniel J Gibson; Priscilla Phillips; Aya Kitamura; Takeo Minematsu; Tomomitsu Miyagaki; Akitatsu Hayashi; Sanae Sasaki; Junko Sugama; Hiromi Sanada
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 3.617

8.  Exploring the prevalence of skin tears and skin properties related to skin tears in elderly patients at a long-term medical facility in Japan.

Authors:  Yuiko Koyano; Gojiro Nakagami; Shinji Iizaka; Takeo Minematsu; Hiroshi Noguchi; Nao Tamai; Yuko Mugita; Aya Kitamura; Keiko Tabata; Masatoshi Abe; Ryoko Murayama; Junko Sugama; Hiromi Sanada
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.315

9.  Clinical wound assessment using DESIGN-R total score can predict pressure ulcer healing: pooled analysis from two multicenter cohort studies.

Authors:  Hiromi Sanada; Shinji Iizaka; Yuko Matsui; Masutaka Furue; Takao Tachibana; Takeo Nakayama; Junko Sugama; Katsunori Furuta; Masahiro Tachi; Keiko Tokunaga; Yoshiki Miyachi
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2011 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.617

10.  The visualization of biofilms in chronic diabetic foot wounds using routine diagnostic microscopy methods.

Authors:  Angela Oates; Frank L Bowling; Andrew J M Boulton; Philip G Bowler; Daniel G Metcalf; Andrew J McBain
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 4.011

View more
  6 in total

1.  Rapid detection of biofilm by wound blotting following sharp debridement of chronic pressure ulcers predicts wound healing: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Gojiro Nakagami; Gregory Schultz; Aya Kitamura; Takeo Minematsu; Kaname Akamata; Hiraku Suga; Masakazu Kurita; Chieko Hayashi; Hiromi Sanada
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Point-of-Care Wound Blotting with Alcian Blue Grading versus Fluorescence Imaging for Biofilm Detection and Predicting 90-Day Healing Outcomes.

Authors:  Yu-Feng Wu; Yu-Chen Lin; Hung-Wei Yang; Nai-Chen Cheng; Chao-Min Cheng
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-05-22

Review 3.  Diagnostics for Wound Infections.

Authors:  Shuxin Li; Paul Renick; Jon Senkowsky; Ashwin Nair; Liping Tang
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 4.947

4.  Chronic wounds: Treatment consensus.

Authors:  Elof Eriksson; Paul Y Liu; Gregory S Schultz; Manuela M Martins-Green; Rica Tanaka; Dot Weir; Lisa J Gould; David G Armstrong; Gary W Gibbons; Randy Wolcott; Oluyinka O Olutoye; Robert S Kirsner; Geoffrey C Gurtner
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.401

Review 5.  Sampling the skin surface chemistry for diagnosis and prognosis.

Authors:  Guy H M Stanley; Katie Wang; Patrick Daly; Christopher Lau; Aoife M O'Brien; Cheryl Hamill; Mark Fear; Fiona M Wood
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.401

Review 6.  Skin Microbiota and its Interplay with Wound Healing.

Authors:  Marjana Tomic-Canic; Jamie L Burgess; Katelyn E O'Neill; Natasa Strbo; Irena Pastar
Journal:  Am J Clin Dermatol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 7.403

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.