| Literature DB >> 22747950 |
Shinji Iizaka1, Hiromi Sanada, Yuko Matsui, Masutaka Furue, Takao Tachibana, Takeo Nakayama, Junko Sugama, Katsunori Furuta, Masahiro Tachi, Keiko Tokunaga, Yoshiki Miyachi.
Abstract
There are few studies on predictive validity of methods to monitor the healing process of pressure ulcers. We evaluated whether the change of DESIGN-R (rating) score could predict subsequent healing, and determined the optimal cutoff points. In a multicenter prospective cohort study, patients were followed until wound healing or censoring. Wound severity was evaluated by the DESIGN-R tool every week, and the score change was calculated over 1-4 weeks (n = 411, 286, 224, and 170, respectively). In the multivariate analyses stratified by depth, a one-point improvement in DESIGN-R score over any period was positively associated with healing within the next 30 days independent of initial wound severity (hazard ratios over each 1-4 weeks ranging from 1.16 to 1.33 for superficial ulcers and from 1.21 to 1.27 for deep ulcers; all p < 0.05). The optimal cutoff points over 1-4 weeks were set as negative change for superficial ulcers and as positive change of ≥two points for deep ulcers. Nonhealing rate was higher for ulcers with DESIGN-R score change below the cutoff points than that aforementioned for both depths. Weekly monitoring by the DESIGN-R tool will be advantageous for evaluating prognosis of pressure ulcers independent of initial wound severity and depth.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22747950 DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2012.00778.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Wound Repair Regen ISSN: 1067-1927 Impact factor: 3.617