Literature DB >> 22092794

Clinical wound assessment using DESIGN-R total score can predict pressure ulcer healing: pooled analysis from two multicenter cohort studies.

Hiromi Sanada1, Shinji Iizaka, Yuko Matsui, Masutaka Furue, Takao Tachibana, Takeo Nakayama, Junko Sugama, Katsunori Furuta, Masahiro Tachi, Keiko Tokunaga, Yoshiki Miyachi.   

Abstract

There are few clinical tools with both predictive validity for pressure ulcer healing and availability in broad populations. We evaluated whether the total scores from DESIGN-R tool could predict pressure ulcer healing. We followed 3,196 patients with pressure ulcers from two multicenter cohort studies until wound healing, patient death, or discharge. Wound severity was evaluated by DESIGN-R tool from 0 (healed) to 66 (greatest severity). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazard model, higher DESIGN-R total scores at baseline were associated with lower healing rates (hazard ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.89-0.92), independent of the patient's characteristics, setting types, and wound depth or location. DESIGN-R had discriminative value for wound healing up to 90 days; the area under the receiver-operating characteristics curve from univariate analysis was 0.81 for healing within 30 days and 0.74 for healing within 30-90 days. The cutoff points were 9 for healing within 30 days and 18 within 30-90 days (positive and negative predictive value 78.8 and 74.1%; 63.9 and 81.1%, respectively). These points were validated for both superficial and deep ulcers. DESIGN-R can be a useful tool to predict pressure ulcer healing for a wide range of patient populations, settings, and wound locations.
© 2011 by the Wound Healing Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22092794     DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2011.00719.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wound Repair Regen        ISSN: 1067-1927            Impact factor:   3.617


  6 in total

1.  Lower temperature at the wound edge detected by thermography predicts undermining development in pressure ulcers: a pilot study.

Authors:  Toshiki Kanazawa; Aya Kitamura; Gojiro Nakagami; Taichi Goto; Tomomitsu Miyagaki; Akitatsu Hayashi; Sanae Sasaki; Yuko Mugita; Shinji Iizaka; Hiromi Sanada
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.315

2.  Rapid detection of biofilm by wound blotting following sharp debridement of chronic pressure ulcers predicts wound healing: A preliminary study.

Authors:  Gojiro Nakagami; Gregory Schultz; Aya Kitamura; Takeo Minematsu; Kaname Akamata; Hiraku Suga; Masakazu Kurita; Chieko Hayashi; Hiromi Sanada
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Reliability of the Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool for pressure injury assessment: The pressure ulcer detection study.

Authors:  Barbara M Bates-Jensen; Heather E McCreath; Deniz Harputlu; Anabel Patlan
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.617

4.  An exploratory clinical study on the safety and efficacy of an autologous fibroblast-seeded artificial skin cultured with animal product-free medium in patients with diabetic foot ulcers.

Authors:  Naoki Morimoto; Tatsuya Ito; Satoru Takemoto; Mikiko Katakami; Norikazu Kanda; Harue Tada; Shiro Tanaka; Satoshi Teramukai; Katsuya Kawai; Yoko Nakamura; Yasunari Kasai; Yokode Masayuki; Taira Maekawa; Akira Shimizu; Shigehiko Suzuki
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2012-09-07       Impact factor: 3.315

5.  Hydrogen water intake via tube-feeding for patients with pressure ulcer and its reconstructive effects on normal human skin cells in vitro.

Authors:  Qiang Li; Shinya Kato; Daigo Matsuoka; Hiroshi Tanaka; Nobuhiko Miwa
Journal:  Med Gas Res       Date:  2013-09-10

6.  Polymyalgia Rheumatica in a Patient with Pseudogout and Dementia.

Authors:  Nozomi Aoki; Taiju Miyagami; Kiyoshi Shikino; Kwang-Seok Yang; Toshio Naito
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2021-11-23
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.