Literature DB >> 31679063

Mechanical and functional validation of a perfused, robot-assisted partial nephrectomy simulation platform using a combination of 3D printing and hydrogel casting.

Rachel Melnyk1, Bahie Ezzat2, Elizabeth Belfast1, Patrick Saba1, Shamroz Farooq3, Timothy Campbell3, Stephen McAleavey2, Mark Buckley2, Ahmed Ghazi4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND
OBJECTIVES: There is a scarcity of high-fidelity, life-like, standardized and anatomically correct polymer-based kidney models for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) simulation training. The purpose of this technical report is to present mechanical and functional testing data as evidence for utilizing a perfused hydrogel kidney model created utilizing 3D printed injection casts for RAPN simulation and training.
METHODS: Anatomically correct, tumor-laden kidney models were created from 3D-printed casts designed from a patient's CT scan and injected with poly-vinyl alcohol (PVA). A variety of testing methods quantified Young's modulus in addition to comparing the functional effects of bleeding and suturing among fresh porcine kidneys and various formulations of PVA kidneys.
RESULTS: 7% PVA at three freeze-thaw cycles (7%-3FT) was found to be the formula that best replicates the mechanical properties of fresh porcine kidney tissue, where mean(± SD) values of Young's modulus of porcine tissue vs 7%-3FT samples were calculated to be 85.97(± 35) kPa vs 80.97(± 9.05) kPa, 15.7(± 1.6) kPa vs 74.56(± 10) kPa and 87.46(± 2.97) kPa vs 83.4(± 0.7) kPa for unconfined compression, indentation and elastography testing, respectively. No significant difference was seen in mean suture tension during renorrhaphy necessary to achieve observable hemostasis and capsular violation during a simulated perfusion at 120 mmHg.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to utilize extensive material testing analyses to determine the mechanical and functional properties of a perfused, inanimate simulation platform for RAPN, fabricated using a combination of image segmentation, 3D printing and PVA casting.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; High fidelity; Inanimate model; Mechanical testing; Partial nephrectomy; Perfused kidney model; Simulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31679063      PMCID: PMC7730938          DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02989-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  31 in total

1.  Material characterization of the pig kidney in relation with the biomechanical analysis of renal trauma.

Authors:  M Farshad; M Barbezat; P Flüeler; F Schmidlin; P Graber; P Niederer
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  FEBio: finite elements for biomechanics.

Authors:  Steve A Maas; Benjamin J Ellis; Gerard A Ateshian; Jeffrey A Weiss
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Biomaterial characteristics and application of silicone rubber and PVA hydrogels mimicked in organ groups for prostate brachytherapy.

Authors:  Pan Li; Shan Jiang; Yan Yu; Jun Yang; Zhiyong Yang
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2015-05-21

4.  Investigation of forces involved in closure of the renal remnant after simulated partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Donald M Endres; Robert W Bossemeyer; Conrad M Tobert; William H Baer; Brian R Lane
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 5.  A Systematic Review of Virtual Reality Simulators for Robot-assisted Surgery.

Authors:  Andrea Moglia; Vincenzo Ferrari; Luca Morelli; Mauro Ferrari; Franco Mosca; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Individualized Physical 3-dimensional Kidney Tumor Models Constructed From 3-dimensional Printers Result in Improved Trainee Anatomic Understanding.

Authors:  Margaret Knoedler; Allison H Feibus; Andrew Lange; Michael M Maddox; Elisa Ledet; Raju Thomas; Jonathan L Silberstein
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Robotic partial nephrectomy with sliding-clip renorrhaphy: technique and outcomes.

Authors:  Brian M Benway; Agnes J Wang; Jose M Cabello; Sam B Bhayani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2009-01-07       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Laparoscopic training on Thiel human cadavers: a model to teach advanced laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Urs Giger; Isabelle Frésard; André Häfliger; Mathias Bergmann; Lukas Krähenbühl
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Adoption of laparoscopic colectomy: results and implications of ASCRS hands-on course participation.

Authors:  Howard M Ross; Clifford L Simmang; James W Fleshman; Peter W Marcello
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.058

10.  SIM Life: a new surgical simulation device using a human perfused cadaver.

Authors:  J P Faure; C Breque; J Danion; P O Delpech; D Oriot; J P Richer
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 1.246

View more
  10 in total

1.  How specific are patient-specific simulations? Analyzing the accuracy of 3D-printing and modeling to create patient-specific rehearsals for complex urological procedures.

Authors:  Rachel Melnyk; Daniel Oppenheimer; Ahmed E Ghazi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-08-14       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Hemorrhaging laparoscopic partial nephrectomy - feasibility of a novel simulation model.

Authors:  Avril J Lusty; Joanne Bleackley; Matthew Roberts; James Watterson; Isabelle Raîche
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.052

Review 3.  Innovations in Urologic Surgical Training.

Authors:  Runzhuo Ma; Sharath Reddy; Erik B Vanstrum; Andrew J Hung
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-03-13       Impact factor: 3.092

4.  Evolving robotic surgery training and improving patient safety, with the integration of novel technologies.

Authors:  I-Hsuan Alan Chen; Ahmed Ghazi; Ashwin Sridhar; Danail Stoyanov; Mark Slack; John D Kelly; Justin W Collins
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 5.  Patient-specific, touch-based registration during robotic, image-guided partial nephrectomy.

Authors:  Naren Nimmagadda; James M Ferguson; Nicholas L Kavoussi; Bryn Pitt; Eric J Barth; Josephine Granna; Robert J Webster; S Duke Herrell
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Utilizing 3D Printing and Hydrogel Casting for the Development of Patient-Specific Rehearsal Platforms for Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomies.

Authors:  Ahmed Ghazi; Patrick Saba; Rachel Melnyk; Jean Joseph
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2020-10-28       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Validity of a patient-specific percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) simulated surgical rehearsal platform: impact on patient and surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Ahmed Ghazi; Rachel Melnyk; Shamroz Farooq; Adrian Bell; Tyler Holler; Patrick Saba; Jean Joseph
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 3.661

8.  Accuracy of Touch-Based Registration During Robotic Image-Guided Partial Nephrectomy Before and After Tumor Resection in Validated Phantoms.

Authors:  Nicholas L Kavoussi; Bryn Pitt; James M Ferguson; Josephine Granna; Andria Remirez; Naren Nimmagadda; Rachel Melnyk; Ahmed Ghazi; Eric J Barth; Robert J Webster; Stanley Duke Herrell
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.619

9.  The clinical application value of mixed-reality-assisted surgical navigation for laparoscopic nephrectomy.

Authors:  Guan Li; Jie Dong; Jinbao Wang; Dongbing Cao; Xin Zhang; Zhiqiang Cao; Guangming Lu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 4.452

Review 10.  3D Printing of Physical Organ Models: Recent Developments and Challenges.

Authors:  Zhongboyu Jin; Yuanrong Li; Kang Yu; Linxiang Liu; Jianzhong Fu; Xinhua Yao; Aiguo Zhang; Yong He
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 16.806

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.